5spd GT said:I'm about to (with a friend) run a test between a bone stock 95 Gt and bone stock 98 Gt (both 5spd coupes within 5,000 miles of each other).
We are going to simulate the same weight driver and go from a 2000rpm 1st gear roll to take out the "take-off" advantage that one of us drivers might get over the other. Were going to run power vs. power and shift...and then were going to swap cars...they both have 308 gears toSo the test should be pretty accurate. I think it will be a "drivers race"...
Blue1 said:If the '95 5.0 is the same as the 5.0 in the '91s, it will p*ss all over the 4.6. The 4.6 were down on HP slightly, but considerably down on torque.
Blue1
Blue1 said:If the '95 5.0 is the same as the 5.0 in the '91s, it will p*ss all over the 4.6. The 4.6 were down on HP slightly, but considerably down on torque.
Blue1
As per usual Mike, I'd have to agree with you. Well said!!MikeZ28 said:ahh this is just flat out wrong. the 4.6 NPI was about = in HP to a stock 5.0 the 89-93's were faster than a early 4.6 because of the weight difference.
and a PI 4.6 will waste a stock 5.0 even with the PI car being heaver because the PI 4.6 dynos about 40 HP more than a stock 89-93 5.0
I love the old 5.0 and i will say it is a way better platform too build from but lets stick too facts here. not just favoritism
5spd GT said:Alright I figured I would update this post.
We finally ran a 98 gt (5spd) and 94 gt (5spd) last night.
98 GT - Prochamber/stock 3:27 gears.
94 GT - 3:08's, a bit better driver, and slightly lighter weight driver. 10-20 lb difference on drivers.
Started from a street roll (5mph).
98 Gt started pull immediately and put 1.5 cars on the 94 gt by 70-75mph.
Just a FYI.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?