• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech

5.0 Engine in 2011...

  • Thread starter Thread starter allcarfan
  • Start date Start date Jun 21, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Jun 21, 2009
#1
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #1
What I think of all the posts.....or threads that mention this engine

View attachment 253864

Who "gets" the reference?
 

walter

Founding Member
Aug 13, 1998
1,054
0
46
Houston TX
Jun 21, 2009
#2
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #2
Spaceballs.... ? hmm
 
S

SS02

New Member
May 30, 2009
427
0
0
Fort Worth, Texas
Jun 21, 2009
#3
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #3
Dunno, but the movie is Aliens !!!
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Jun 21, 2009
#4
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #4
The movie is, indeed, Spaceballs.

The quote that comes out of his mouth is:

"OH NO........NOT AGAIN."
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Jun 22, 2009
#5
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #5
while I am kind of tired of all of the posts of the "new" engine, I have a legitimate question....

The new 5.0 engine is, supposedly, rated near 400hp. There are rumors of whether or not this will be in the base GT or a special edition vehicle. No one will know until it actually comes out what it will be in.

My question is....if the new engine will warrant and command a higher price tag, depending on what that price tag is, why would someone not just buy a turbo or SC kit for their 4.6? You can pick one up for $5k.

opinions?
 

Wolvrin704

Member
Apr 17, 2007
120
0
17
Milford, OH
Jun 22, 2009
#6
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #6
allcarfan said:
while I am kind of tired of all of the posts of the "new" engine, I have a legitimate question....

The new 5.0 engine is, supposedly, rated near 400hp. There are rumors of whether or not this will be in the base GT or a special edition vehicle. No one will know until it actually comes out what it will be in.

My question is....if the new engine will warrant and command a higher price tag, depending on what that price tag is, why would someone not just buy a turbo or SC kit for their 4.6? You can pick one up for $5k.

opinions?
Click to expand...

What kills me is how much doubt there is in the Mustang community about this. I frequent Blue Oval News and Ford truck sites and they all talk about the new engines which will be available in the Mustang, F150, etc and that the 4.6 and 5.4 will no longer be made after this year. There seems to be more belief about the 3.5 Ecoboost engine being in the base Mustang than there is the 5.0 and yet yesterday on Blue Oval I read that it has been confirmed the base Stang and F150 will have the 3.7 V6, not the 3.5 as has been widely purported.

I seriously doubt the new motor will warrant a huge price increase. Ford as always uses the same motor in many vehicle platforms thus spreading out the cost of R&D.
 
G

Grape Ape

New Member
Jun 10, 2009
2
0
0
Jun 22, 2009
#7
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #7
allcarfan said:
while I am kind of tired of all of the posts of the "new" engine, I have a legitimate question....

The new 5.0 engine is, supposedly, rated near 400hp. There are rumors of whether or not this will be in the base GT or a special edition vehicle. No one will know until it actually comes out what it will be in.

My question is....if the new engine will warrant and command a higher price tag, depending on what that price tag is, why would someone not just buy a turbo or SC kit for their 4.6? You can pick one up for $5k.

opinions?
Click to expand...

For the warranty, maybe better mileage and I bet resale would be better.
 
G

Grape Ape

New Member
Jun 10, 2009
2
0
0
Jun 22, 2009
#8
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #8
Wolvrin704 said:
What kills me is how much doubt there is in the Mustang community about this. I frequent Blue Oval News and Ford truck sites and they all talk about the new engines which will be available in the Mustang, F150, etc and that the 4.6 and 5.4 will no longer be made after this year. There seems to be more belief about the 3.5 Ecoboost engine being in the base Mustang than there is the 5.0 and yet yesterday on Blue Oval I read that it has been confirmed the base Stang and F150 will have the 3.7 V6, not the 3.5 as has been widely purported.
Click to expand...

Does anyone really believe that the EcoBoost will be the base engine? A D35 or D37 seemed like a pretty good base v6 for a long time. I thought the theory was that the GT would be offered with they buyer's choice of the EcoBoost or the 5.0. Or that one of those two would be the GT and the other a (near GT price and spec) special edition.

Wolvrin704 said:
I seriously doubt the new motor will warrant a huge price increase. Ford as always uses the same motor in many vehicle platforms thus spreading out the cost of R&D.
Click to expand...

Agreed. There is no reason that the 5.0 has to cost more than the 4.6. It might even be a bit less since it replaces the 4.6 & 5.4 it could offer some economies of scale.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Jun 22, 2009
#9
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #9
Grape Ape said:
For the warranty, maybe better mileage and I bet resale would be better.
Click to expand...

The Roushcharger and FRPP whipple kit keep the factory warranty. I dont know about resale. I doubt there would be that much difference.....unless someone is looking for an "unmodified" mustang. Is that what you are referring to?

Since we do not know any REAL specs on the "5.0," better mileage is debatable.
 
S

SS02

New Member
May 30, 2009
427
0
0
Fort Worth, Texas
Jun 22, 2009
#10
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #10
Best advice....wait till it gets here, whether the price is higher (Which in my opinion I believe it will be just for the fact of 5.0 being on the body of a mustang------the IT factor) Gas MPG ill bet will be around the rated MPGs of 20 or so. You can debate it all you want ( Which is FUN I agree) but until official specs are released its all here say.

I feel this is the best thing ford could do, rebirth the 5.0, the mustang I feel will double in sales and be the talk of all media. This is legendary, so lets hope FORD dosnt overthink it and talk themselves out of it. Untill its here, its all here say !!
 

snaggeltooth

New Member
Feb 4, 2009
137
0
0
Alabama
Jun 23, 2009
#11
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #11
if it comes out mid/late next year .. I bet the 4.6 cars prices will fall even more ..
 
G

Grape Ape

New Member
Jun 10, 2009
2
0
0
Jun 23, 2009
#12
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #12
allcarfan said:
The Roushcharger and FRPP whipple kit keep the factory warranty. I dont know about resale. I doubt there would be that much difference.....unless someone is looking for an "unmodified" mustang. Is that what you are referring to?

Since we do not know any REAL specs on the "5.0," better mileage is debatable.
Click to expand...

I would assume that a car with an aftermarket blower had been driven had and expect more mechanical trouble than I would expect from an otherwise identical car.

Because of when it was designed (better tech, higher gas prices & impending CAFE hikes) I expect the 5.0 to be more efficient than the 4.6. And lowering fiction and parasitic loads also frees up some extra power at WOT.

I also think the extra load of spinning a blower should knock the 4.6's mileage down a touch.
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Jun 24, 2009
#13
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #13
I dont know who ever thought the ecoboost was going to be the base V6... that is almost laughable.. that is a high cost engine no way that motor will be in a base mustang..


the 3.7 v6 N/A is probably going to be the base motor.. makes sense and can compare to the camaro v6


BTW the reason to wait for the new motor is if this motor is what I think it's going to be then it's going to be a sick motor.. much better platform to build off of than the 4.6


thats IF it's a destroked 6.2 I might be very wrong on that.. if it's another modular bored a tiny bit I will pass with my money.

it's time for the modular to go... WE NEED the big bore 6.2 based motors to compete in the truck market.. and ford would be retarded not to destroke the 6.2 for the mustang.


Plus I have heard some rumors on the net that the mods have already gone out of production..
 

snaggeltooth

New Member
Feb 4, 2009
137
0
0
Alabama
Jun 25, 2009
#14
  • Jun 25, 2009
  • #14
If its a brand new motor ..dont you think you should wait a while to make sure all the "bugs" have been worked out ???
 
S

SS02

New Member
May 30, 2009
427
0
0
Fort Worth, Texas
Jun 25, 2009
#15
  • Jun 25, 2009
  • #15
From my understanding the 5.0 has been used by Frpp Racing for awhile
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jun 25, 2009
#16
  • Jun 25, 2009
  • #16
SS02 said:
From my understanding the 5.0 has been used by Frpp Racing for awhile
Click to expand...

That's a different engine altogether. The FRPP 5.0L is basically just a bored/stroked version of the current 4.6L Modular casting.

The new "Coyote" engine starts with a clean slate, and is said to have nice wide bore spacing for some serious displacement potential.
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Jun 25, 2009
#17
  • Jun 25, 2009
  • #17
Gearbanger 101 said:
That's a different engine altogether. The FRPP 5.0L is basically just a bored/stroked version of the current 4.6L Modular casting.

The new "Coyote" engine starts with a clean slate, and is said to have nice wide bore spacing for some serious displacement potential.
Click to expand...

Exactly.. this is not the cammer.. for one that motor would be way to expensive for production..

snaggeltooth said:
If its a brand new motor ..dont you think you should wait a while to make sure all the "bugs" have been worked out ???
Click to expand...

NAH..

the 3.5 and 3.7 cyclone WAS a all new motor and they have been fine.. I have yet to see one with a problem..
 
S

SS02

New Member
May 30, 2009
427
0
0
Fort Worth, Texas
Jun 26, 2009
#18
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #18
^^^Good info
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,389
3,536
233
Jul 3, 2009
#19
  • Jul 3, 2009
  • #19
snaggeltooth said:
If its a brand new motor ..dont you think you should wait a while to make sure all the "bugs" have been worked out ???
Click to expand...
You must not be familiar with what Ford puts their engines through before they are deemed worthy.

300 hours, WOT, fully loaded cycling between highest HP RPM and high TQ RPM. Several engines have to withstand that before Ford allows it to be used.
 
S

SS02

New Member
May 30, 2009
427
0
0
Fort Worth, Texas
Jul 3, 2009
#20
  • Jul 3, 2009
  • #20
^^^^^^WOW
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Crankshaft/Camshaft codes
  • rockinstang11
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
169
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Oct 20, 2025
rockinstang11
  • Locked
93 LX father son project
  • ZAM93LX
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
15
Views
488
The Welcome Wagon Oct 28, 2025
Noobz347
T
Fox *Solved* Motor mount bolt question
  • TDM389
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
221
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 22, 2026
TDM389
T
J
Help finding throttle body
  • jpmaxx
  • Apr 21, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
157
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 22, 2026
jpmaxx
J
G
Octane on the 5.0 Coyote
  • gray owl
  • May 17, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
7
Views
121
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk May 27, 2026
Bullitt347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?