• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

5.0 heads on a 69 302

  • Thread starter Thread starter DripPan
  • Start date Start date Jan 30, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
D

DripPan

New Member
Jan 30, 2008
5
0
0
Jan 30, 2008
#1
  • Jan 30, 2008
  • #1
I have a 69 Mustang, 63K with bad valves, good compression. I also have good 5.0 heads from a 89 Crown Vic (roller motor) that Id like to slap on the 69 motor. Can this happen with the 69 cam and pushrods? Will I need to swap rockers or anything else? Please let me know if I have everything between the two engines other than gaskets. I'm not after performance just a driver for the wife and if I have the parts on hand all is well with my world!

Thanks!
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 30, 2008
#2
  • Jan 30, 2008
  • #2
You don't want to use those Vic heads on anything. Those are the E6SE's. Good for torque below 2500 rpms, but they'll cost you horsepower. The valves are shrouded and the chambers deeper and have more volume than your 69 heads. That'll cost you in the compression ratio.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Jan 30, 2008
#3
  • Jan 30, 2008
  • #3
Find some E7 heads - they typically go almost free around here (or maybe $50 if they are in really good shape), or buy a pair of GT40 heads off a '96 Exploder. I can't answer your question about whether everything will fit. The typical advice I see is to ALWAYS mock up the engine and check everything.
 
D

DripPan

New Member
Jan 30, 2008
5
0
0
Jan 30, 2008
#4
  • Jan 30, 2008
  • #4
D.Hearne said:
You don't want to use those Vic heads on anything. Those are the E6SE's. Good for torque below 2500 rpms, but they'll cost you horsepower. The valves are shrouded and the chambers deeper and have more volume than your 69 heads. That'll cost you in the compression ratio.
Click to expand...

But will they work with the stock 69 cam, lifters and pushrods? I don't care about HP, and are the rockers adjustable?
 
D

DripPan

New Member
Jan 30, 2008
5
0
0
Jan 30, 2008
#5
  • Jan 30, 2008
  • #5
D.Hearne said:
You don't want to use those Vic heads on anything. Those are the E6SE's. Good for torque below 2500 rpms, but they'll cost you horsepower. The valves are shrouded and the chambers deeper and have more volume than your 69 heads. That'll cost you in the compression ratio.
Click to expand...

Other option, using the 5.0 in the Stang and putting a carburetor and AOD on it? The harmonic balancer and pulley to convert it back to 69 belts and accessories? Thanks in advance.
I don't want to go the EFI route.
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Jan 30, 2008
#6
  • Jan 30, 2008
  • #6
If youre talking about using a late model Mustang 5.0, youll need a late model 58oz dampner too. I dont think there were any 58oz 3 bolt dampners made, so youll need a pulley too. As for putting a carb on the late model engine, itll work great. Having the AOD should make a big difference too, depending on what rear gear you have. If you already have a 2.79 or so, and dont feel like changing it, just stick with whatever trans you have.
 
D

DripPan

New Member
Jan 30, 2008
5
0
0
Jan 30, 2008
#7
  • Jan 30, 2008
  • #7
Decurion said:
If youre talking about using a late model Mustang 5.0, youll need a late model 58oz dampner too. I dont think there were any 58oz 3 bolt dampners made, so youll need a pulley too. As for putting a carb on the late model engine, itll work great. Having the AOD should make a big difference too, depending on what rear gear you have. If you already have a 2.79 or so, and dont feel like changing it, just stick with whatever trans you have.
Click to expand...

OK, not a Mustang motor but a 1989 5.0 Crown Vic, close enough for what we're talking about. How would I change that front pulley to use an old style V belt if I go the engine swap mode? (see swapping the heads sounds so much easier)!

Thanks to all you guys for your expertise.
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Jan 30, 2008
#8
  • Jan 30, 2008
  • #8
You could use the whole crown vic engine, just swap the old accessories/drives onto it, including the timing cover and water pump, then find a new crank pulley. Either way you wind up with the same chokey heads.
 

Edster

Founding Member
Aug 13, 2000
500
1
19
League City, Texas
Jan 30, 2008
#9
  • Jan 30, 2008
  • #9
From what I understand the early 351 heads out perform any of the 302/5.0 heads due to bigger ports and valves. (except the Boss heads). Plus you get a smaller combustion chamber that will give you a little more compression. Around 74 or so the 351W used the same head as the 302, big combustion chamber and smaller valves. If this is so wouldn't that be a better option?
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Jan 30, 2008
#10
  • Jan 30, 2008
  • #10
check your casting numbers i have worked on alot of Vic's that had E7 heads so look at them and see first. If they are E7 heads they will work with your current cam/lifter setup and you will need a 6.800 pushrod.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Jan 31, 2008
#11
  • Jan 31, 2008
  • #11
Decurion said:
If youre talking about using a late model Mustang 5.0, youll need a late model 58oz dampner too. I dont think there were any 58oz 3 bolt dampners made, so youll need a pulley too. As for putting a carb on the late model engine, itll work great. Having the AOD should make a big difference too, depending on what rear gear you have. If you already have a 2.79 or so, and dont feel like changing it, just stick with whatever trans you have.
Click to expand...

Aren't the 5.0 motors 50oz imballance and the earlier motors 28oz imballance ?

There are ballancers made for late model motors that are setup for 3 bolt pullys.

Personally I'd just run the serpentine setup.
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Jan 31, 2008
#12
  • Jan 31, 2008
  • #12
Rusty67 said:
Aren't the 5.0 motors 50oz imballance and the earlier motors 28oz imballance ?

There are ballancers made for late model motors that are setup for 3 bolt pullys.

Personally I'd just run the serpentine setup.
Click to expand...


yes, yes, and yes.

I would just take the whole motor. I would rather have the roller lifters over a junk hft setup anyday
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 31, 2008
#13
  • Jan 31, 2008
  • #13
DripPan said:
But will they work with the stock 69 cam, lifters and pushrods? I don't care about HP, and are the rockers adjustable?
Click to expand...

Yea, they'll work, and no, the rockers aren't adjustable. Neither are your 69's. The Vic motor was rated at 150 hp. You could give it help by swapping on a set of Cobra 1.7 roller rockers and dual exhaust. With that, you're looking at about 175 hp. There are 50 oz balancers thru some classic Stang vendors to use the earlier accessories on a late model motor.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 31, 2008
#14
  • Jan 31, 2008
  • #14
PUNISHER RACING said:
check your casting numbers i have worked on alot of Vic's that had E7 heads so look at them and see first. If they are E7 heads they will work with your current cam/lifter setup and you will need a 6.800 pushrod.
Click to expand...

Easy way to check the heads is look at the lower front corner of the passenger side head, next to the valve cover, the E6SE's have an "S" here, E7TE's have a "T". GT40P's have a "P" All the Vic/large Merc/Lincoln 5.0's I've seen all had the E6SE heads, but anything is possible. Seen a couple truck 5.0's with the E6SE's too.
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Jan 31, 2008
#15
  • Jan 31, 2008
  • #15
Rusty67 said:
Aren't the 5.0 motors 50oz imballance and the earlier motors 28oz imballance ?

There are ballancers made for late model motors that are setup for 3 bolt pullys.

Personally I'd just run the serpentine setup.
Click to expand...

Thats what I meant, I knew 58oz didnt sound right, but I was tired. What had the 50oz, 3 bolt dampner? Thats news to me.
 
P

PJC Racing

New Member
Nov 21, 2007
199
0
0
Jan 31, 2008
#16
  • Jan 31, 2008
  • #16
You do not need to change the balancer when changing the heads. They are completely unrelated.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Jan 31, 2008
#17
  • Jan 31, 2008
  • #17
Decurion said:
Thats what I meant, I knew 58oz didnt sound right, but I was tired. What had the 50oz, 3 bolt dampner? Thats news to me.
Click to expand...

Its not a stock part to my knowledge but a lot of the aftermarket ones come in 3 hole or are drilled/taped for both

PJC Racing said:
You do not need to change the balancer when changing the heads. They are completely unrelated.
Click to expand...

He didn't ask if he needed to change the ballancer to change the heads, he wanted to know if he needed to change it to run a V-belt setup.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 31, 2008
#18
  • Jan 31, 2008
  • #18
3 bolt 50 oz balancer is an aftermarket only item. No factory application for that.
 
D

DripPan

New Member
Jan 30, 2008
5
0
0
Feb 1, 2008
#19
  • Feb 1, 2008
  • #19
D.Hearne said:
3 bolt 50 oz balancer is an aftermarket only item. No factory application for that.
Click to expand...

Now we're really getting somewhere, seems something gets lost in the writing sometimes. Who carries the other balancer (vbelt) should I do the engine swap?
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Feb 2, 2008
#20
  • Feb 2, 2008
  • #20
about all the aftermarkets like professional products have both sets of holes

http://www.professional-products.com/dampersProductSBford.php
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Early ford 302 heads
  • Dagasser
  • May 4, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
74
The Welcome Wagon May 4, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
824
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
246
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
H
Brand New Built 302 overheating
  • hassler
  • Sep 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
Rcdgl
R
D
Roller rockers with no compression
  • DPORTER0729
  • Jan 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
918
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 23, 2025
mobilly
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?