• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

5.0 heads on a 69 302

  • Thread starter Thread starter DripPan
  • Start date Start date Jan 30, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 2, 2008
#21
  • Feb 2, 2008
  • #21
DripPan said:
Now we're really getting somewhere, seems something gets lost in the writing sometimes. Who carries the other balancer (vbelt) should I do the engine swap?
Click to expand...

Some of the classic Stang parts vendors sell these balancers.
 

fastbackbullitt

New Member
Mar 2, 2008
4
1
1
Mar 2, 2008
#22
  • Mar 2, 2008
  • #22
PUNISHER RACING said:
check your casting numbers i have worked on alot of Vic's that had E7 heads so look at them and see first. If they are E7 heads they will work with your current cam/lifter setup and you will need a 6.800 pushrod.
Click to expand...

Ok I am going to try this. I have a set of E7 heads off a mustang and they have the original rocker arms. I will be putting them on a 1969 302. Is there anything else I need to look for? Thanks.
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Mar 3, 2008
#23
  • Mar 3, 2008
  • #23
I believe that if you are only going to swap the heads, the primary difference will be with the rocker arms. I.E. Pedastal mount as apposed to the earlier style rocker mount.
Proper push rod length will be a concern.
Buy an adjustable P/R checker from Comp Cams. They are in expensive and a very necessary tool to have when you get into more perfromance applications.
Other than P/R length, I BELIEVE all else should remain the same.
I had a major learning curve about what 'should' fit, and what needs to be measured. Measure everything, twice.
 

fastbackbullitt

New Member
Mar 2, 2008
4
1
1
Apr 2, 2008
#24
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #24
Well finally put heads on car. Well the pushrods from the 69 heads are to long. So I bought a set of 6.80 inch long pushrods and well they are to short. They are melling part number mpr-279. Does anyone know what the correct pushrod part number is? It was really disappointing after all the work. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Apr 2, 2008
#25
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #25
The pushrods you need are the ones used from 78-84 in the 5.0 Stangs or the 85-91 E or F series trucks and vans.
 

fastbackbullitt

New Member
Mar 2, 2008
4
1
1
Apr 2, 2008
#26
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #26
1988 Ford truck with a 5.0 shows a mpr-281. I went to autozone.com and looked at the different part numbers for 1969 and it show mpr-281 and mpr-279. The mpr-281 are my old ones and the mpr-279 is the ones I just bought. They are to short. The mpr-281 are to long. I am lost.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Apr 2, 2008
#27
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #27
How are you determining the length?
 

fastbackbullitt

New Member
Mar 2, 2008
4
1
1
Apr 2, 2008
#28
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #28
http://www.rocketindustries.com.au/search.php?field=PUSHRODS&brand=Melling
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Apr 2, 2008
#29
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #29
Ford's 5.0 book lists a length of 6.88" for your application. Comp Cams p/n 7631-16 (magnum line)or 7831-16 (high energy line) both are listed as 6.87" or 6.9" Summit brand p/n is SUM-G6413. Crane pushrods p/n 36661
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Apr 3, 2008
#30
  • Apr 3, 2008
  • #30
woodsnake said:
I believe that if you are only going to swap the heads, the primary difference will be with the rocker arms. I.E. Pedastal mount as apposed to the earlier style rocker mount.
Proper push rod length will be a concern.
Buy an adjustable P/R checker from Comp Cams. They are in expensive and a very necessary tool to have when you get into more perfromance applications.
Other than P/R length, I BELIEVE all else should remain the same.
I had a major learning curve about what 'should' fit, and what needs to be measured. Measure everything, twice.
Click to expand...

I'm with him. For $20 you can actually determine the correct length pushrod. All the parts in an engine have tolerances, which will effect the proper length. Also, any of the parts could have been cut in the past.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Early ford 302 heads
  • Dagasser
  • May 4, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
82
The Welcome Wagon May 4, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
888
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
289
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
H
Brand New Built 302 overheating
  • hassler
  • Sep 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
Rcdgl
R
D
Roller rockers with no compression
  • DPORTER0729
  • Jan 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
931
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 23, 2025
mobilly
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?