Contrary to what DocG says i am not interested in 10 year old boysLaserSVT isn't very nice. Sweet car, man- trade you a 10 year old for it, he does the lawn!![]()

Contrary to what DocG says i am not interested in 10 year old boysLaserSVT isn't very nice. Sweet car, man- trade you a 10 year old for it, he does the lawn!![]()

Contrary to what DocG says i am not interested in 10 year old boys![]()
427 HP supercharged engine, larger brakes and better suspensionwhat makes the 427r the 427r, anything special about it other then the body kit, wheels and super gay wing?

Well in that case, then no. Dont want teh boy. Now if you have a hawt legal teenage daughter we may talkI didn't mean in a special way.
No, Ford forgot we were here, as did the publications. The old timers (64 GTO guys, 68 Roadrunner guys) know what we are so crazy for. You didn't spend a lot of cash to have your car kick you in the ass, and smoke cars that cost their owners plenty more. I went with the LX for that reason, and it looked like a proper hotrod- no plastic crap glued to it, big-ass tailpipes, and a chrome metal emblem- not that I disliked the GT. They pay attention at the strips across the country, at every stoplight, and we continue to spend $ on our next upgrades we want, but that doesn't sell next months issue, or the overpriced land barge in the showroom- cars you can't even comfortably lean your elbow on the door while driving. I'm definitly an old car guy, and I'm only 42. I don't want a new one, my Fox is better.I have pretty much stopped paying attention to new cars altogether, not even just new mustangs. My being a car guy is turning into me being an old car guy.
With the new mustang, the biggest disappointment for me is all these amazingly badass engines they have alreayd made sitting on a shelf collecting dust while they want to sell me more airbags and a dashboard with 400 different colors. Sorry, I want a base looking V6 mustang with big wheels being the only indication that theres a honkin motor under the hood. These days though, S197s are so played out. Everyone putting paint and tape on their S197 to call it a GT350 or 427R or something. It all just makes me roll my eyes.
And it really pisses me off when people call the possibility of Ford putting the 5.0 Cammer engine in the S197 "bringing back the 5.0". No, its not being brought BACK. the engine has never been in a mustang before. Its just another marketing adventure to make money off of an old name. Which is very odd, also, to hark abck to the days of the 5.0 (80s and 90s) in a car that harks back to the 60s, in 2010...
I have teh new wheels just waiting for teh tires to show up so I can get the car out of the shop
![]()


I don't have it in front of me, but I believe last month's 5.0M&SF had an editorial talking about this... And the editor made it clear that the high-dollar S197 project car articles are what sells magazines. It sucks, but its how it is. I enjoy StangNet more than my magazines now, I mean think about it- we get to see real world project cars in action, and there is a LOT more Fox body information on this website any given day than what you could fit into a magazine.
I don't have any problem with the newer cars, they're just not for me. I bought my Mustang, keeping it, driving and adjusting it, spending my money on it was and will continue to be much more cost effective, and fun, than spending tons more on a newer one. But there are lots more of us old car guys than new car guys. The publications abandoned this market, however. But I do get the useful info, and fun regarding this hobby on the internet, which does seem to make the decided lack of attention less obvious. There is good stuff here, and some other sites, and I'm trying to make a transition to the 21st century. This is free, more convenient, and if I figure it all out, user friendly. Just seems funny the magazines that needed us to take off, took off.Anyone here who can actually say they "hate" the new Mustangs is just being stubborn. Its still a Mustang, regardless of how cliche or tasteless some people prefer to dress theirs up. Have you all forgotten about the space-ship body kits, neon paint jobs, and "lowrider" wire wheels so many of these Fox cars were adorned with back in the 90s? Even then, Ford has been putting fake scoops, stick-on racing stripes, and useless badging on Mustangs since the 60s. If people will buy it, somebody will find a way to sell it. Its just how the market works. I've got no beef with the newer Mustangs, and I'm sure I'll own a SN95 or maybe even a S197 someday.
Now, as far as the Magazine thing goes, I think the Internet has really jaded the magazine buisness. I remember when Hot Rod was half its size, and the pages were all black-and-white newspaper. The new competition involved with technology has changed the playing field, and now the magazines will do whatever it takes to stay in the game. I don't have it in front of me, but I believe last month's 5.0M&SF had an editorial talking about this... And the editor made it clear that the high-dollar S197 project car articles are what sells magazines. It sucks, but its how it is. I enjoy StangNet more than my magazines now, I mean think about it- we get to see real world project cars in action, and there is a LOT more Fox body information on this website any given day than what you could fit into a magazine.