• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

66 mustang with 68 8 inch rear end

  • Thread starter Thread starter andrewroderick
  • Start date Start date May 14, 2011
A

andrewroderick

New Member
May 4, 2011
2
0
0
plano Texas
May 14, 2011
#1
  • May 14, 2011
  • #1
i need some help. i now have a 8 inch 5 lug rear end for my 66 mustang that i am converting from 4 lug. i do not know if i need to go with 65-66 leaf spring perches or the 67-68 since the rear end is out of a 68. i am using the 66 leaf springs though. any help would be appreciated.. here is a site that has both pairs.

RH REAR SHOCK PLATE 1967-1970 | CJ Pony Parts

SHOCK PLATE REAR RH 1965-1966 | CJ Pony Parts
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
May 14, 2011
#2
  • May 14, 2011
  • #2
The 65-66 plates and U bolts will not fit the 68 axle tubes.

The 68 axle is wider than the 65-66, so tire clearance is gonna be a problem. Why not just use a 65-66 axle?
 

Realmongo

I prefer to be called "Evil Genius"
Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
2,468
86
99
Western Mass
May 14, 2011
#3
  • May 14, 2011
  • #3
I second the above reccommendation to use the correct rear as it is narrower and actually fits the car without resorting to different wheel backspacing.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
May 14, 2011
#4
  • May 14, 2011
  • #4
I had a '65 years ago that someone had previously equipped with a '67-68 eight-inch and it was not a good fit all. The stock tires will rub on the fenders if you don't change wheel offset to compensate.

Whats ironic is that now I have the exact opposite: a 1957(narrow 65-66 width) nine-inch rear end under my wider '68. The wheels are tucked a bit more, but there are no clearance problems.
 
A

andrewroderick

New Member
May 4, 2011
2
0
0
plano Texas
May 14, 2011
#5
  • May 14, 2011
  • #5
conversion

i converted from the 6 cylinder 4 lug rear end to a 5 lug. so happened i got a deal on this particular rear end.. the backspacing is not a problem for me. i am actually putting on a set of 05 gt mustang rims so the wider axle is better for me being as i am still using a 1/4 spacer plate for offset in the rear. and there is no tire rub on the fenders either with 245 45 17's.

i will stick with the later model leaf spring brackets then. thanks for the help.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

4
1965 mustang 351 850 hp+ primary tubes 1 7/8 or larger and a 3 inch or larger collectors?
  • 427nostang
  • Jun 4, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
223
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Tuesday at 5:33 PM
gray owl
G
J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
57
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
9
1994 Mustang GT 5.0 L Convertible
  • 94ns95
  • Jun 17, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
194
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 19, 2026
94ns95
9
5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
202
The Welcome Wagon Apr 2, 2026
General karthief
N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
316
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?