• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

66 stang T5 conversion

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1979 Camaro
  • Start date Start date Mar 13, 2006
1

1979 Camaro

New Member
May 18, 2005
22
0
0
Mar 13, 2006
#1
  • Mar 13, 2006
  • #1
I am trying to finish the clutch linkage on my 66.

Here's what I am using so far.

5.0 motor,bell housing and T5. 91 vintage.

Hedman Elite long tube headers.

I mocked up the engine and tranny in the car. The headers seem to interfere with a stock cable at the shock tower and the header tube near the bell housing cable mount. I spoke with Modern driveline and even though their cable is longer to help with the shock tower they say the tight header tube near the bell housing mount is a problem.

If I use the stock 66 linkage do I use the 66 throw out bearing and clutch fork?

I know I have to relocate the clutch pivot point on the bell housing and add the pivot point bracket to the engine

Does stock linkage from the equalizer bar clear the headers and the 5.0 bell housing? I have to cut off the cable mounting ear on the bell housing.

Thanks in advance for any help.
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Mar 13, 2006
#2
  • Mar 13, 2006
  • #2
Terrible name.

Use a hydro linkage.
 
1

1979 Camaro

New Member
May 18, 2005
22
0
0
Mar 13, 2006
#3
  • Mar 13, 2006
  • #3
66 T5 conversion

Looked at the hydralic setup.

It will be my third choice. I've got all the other parts for the cable or stock setup.

The body is in the paint shop. Going to paint it Chevy victory red!

The front brakes are C5 Corvette and the rear 94-97 Camaro. Same stuff I used on other projects.

Don't hold it against me, I'm a GM guy from day one but I've always had a soft spot for Mustang fastbacks. They are a great looking cars. This car came along at the right time.

Take a peek at my 79 Camaro in Car Craft April 2005.
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
Mar 14, 2006
#4
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #4
cable + headers = broken cable...I vote hydraulic Hydro or MustangSteve cable clutch. MustangSteve's is the only cable one I'd consider since it uses a 5.0 cable and operates like the factory 5.0 setup, instead of some of the other kits.

For instance, the Ron Morris kit moves the sheathing and not the cable itself, which in turn limits how far you can bend it and where you can route it. If you can't route it well, you'll burn the cable, then Ron Morris will burn you to the tune of $250 for a special replacement cable

MustangSteve's kit seems to be verry flexible in its routing since it works like the stock 5.0 setup and you can use the longer 94-95 cable for even more room.

How the h@ll did you get C5 & camaro brakes to fit? Do you own a machine shop or something?

If you're that handy with fabrication, you can either clone the JMC Hyd clutch setup or skip making it a straight no-hack bolt in, still use the same parts and do it even cheaper http://midnightdsigns.com/Mustang/HYD Clutch.htm
To make that a bolt in, you have to relocate the mounting tabs on the clutch MC and it'll plop right in the factory clutch rod hole.
HTH
--kyle
 

Cannoball888

New Member
Dec 25, 2005
320
0
0
Gainesville, FL
Mar 14, 2006
#5
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #5
5.0ina66 said:
...For instance, the Ron Morris kit moves the sheathing and not the cable itself, which in turn limits how far you can bend it and where you can route it. If you can't route it well, you'll burn the cable...
--kyle
Click to expand...
That's what I have and it works extremely well. The cable is routed between header primaries near the collector. It doesn't get burned because of a peice of fiberglass cloth wrapped around it.
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Mar 14, 2006
#6
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #6
on my cable setup, I whacked a primary off the header and rewelded it out of the way.....clearance issue solved once and for all.
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
Mar 14, 2006
#7
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #7
LMan said:
on my cable setup, I whacked a primary off the header and rewelded it out of the way.....clearance issue solved once and for all.
Click to expand...
That's one way to get er done
 
G

gjz30075

Member
Aug 30, 2004
250
0
17
Roswell, Ga
Mar 14, 2006
#8
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #8
1979 Camaro said:
If I use the stock 66 linkage do I use the 66 throw out bearing and clutch fork?

I know I have to relocate the clutch pivot point on the bell housing and add the pivot point bracket to the engine
Click to expand...

To answer this: yes, because the 5.0 fork expects to be pivoted from the passenger side. When you change the pivot to the driver's side, you have to change the fork to an early fork because there's no provision on the 5.0 fork to pivot from there. Not sure about the throwout bearing; might have to change it because of the way it attaches to the fork.
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Mar 14, 2006
#9
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #9
1979 Camaro said:
I'm a GM guy from day one
Click to expand...

Don't feel bad, everybody makes mistakes
 
1

1979 Camaro

New Member
May 18, 2005
22
0
0
Mar 14, 2006
#10
  • Mar 14, 2006
  • #10
Clutch cable

Thanks for all the help.

I'm going to try the 94-95 cable. I like the idea of using stock parts that are available across the NAPA parts counter.

In regards to the C5 brakes, I got the idea from my 79 Camaro. You can buy brackets that mount C5 brakes on a Camaro spindle. Similar to the upgraded Baer kit only much cheaper.

I started with 1970 Mustang spindles and drum brake hubs. The C5 rotor ID that goes over the hub is bigger than the hub OD. No I don't have machine shop but I have friend who does. They made me a "centering ring" to center the rotor on the hub. Once that was done I redrilled the bolt pattern 4.5" on five to match the hub.

The caliper bracket is similar to the JMC bracket in that it uses the four 3/8" drum brake backing plate holes to mount to the spindle. Trial and error to figure out how far to mount the caliper over the rotor centerline and how far from the spindle center line. I will post some pics here shortly.

The rear calipers are 94-97 Camaro and similar to the Cobra calipers.I used 92 Camaro rear rotors again because I had them. They happened to have the same ID as the OD of the 9" axle hub. I believe 2.770". So the rotors just work with no hub centering ring.

The rear caliper brackets are also the bearing retainers. I bought the Currie disc brake bearing retainers and used them to measure the depth and diameter for the bearing retainer. Made them out of 3/8" x 5" CRS with a step milled .125" to center the caliper over the rotor. Again I will post pics after all of the parts are back from plating this week.

First time I've done the 9" so I hope it works.

Please keep in mind all this stuff is project stuff and should be used at your own risk. No warranty and for racing only. Not DOT approved. Not UL approved. Women and small children take shelter.Take it with a grain salt from a "GM" guy.

Thanks again for all the help.

It's been a fun project.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Mar 15, 2006
#11
  • Mar 15, 2006
  • #11
i used the 5.0 bell housing,stock 4 speed linkage and never had a problem.
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Mar 15, 2006
#12
  • Mar 15, 2006
  • #12
1979 Camaro said:
Please keep in mind all this stuff is project stuff and should be used at your own risk. No warranty and for racing only. Not DOT approved. Not UL approved. Women and small children take shelter.
Click to expand...



I like this guy already
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Mar 15, 2006
#13
  • Mar 15, 2006
  • #13
I had to have the header modified for my ModDriveline cable. I studied it for a long time and couldn't come up with anything else unless I changed headers.
 
1

1979 Camaro

New Member
May 18, 2005
22
0
0
Mar 15, 2006
#14
  • Mar 15, 2006
  • #14
T5 Conversion

Thanks again for all the help.

I will post the brakes pics as soon as possible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
268
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
575
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
Mustang II V6 conversion to V8 HO and T5 problems and solutions
  • greenflash79
  • Jul 6, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2
Replies
34
Views
2K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jan 29, 2026
greenflash79
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
549
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
D
PLEASE HELP - T5 in a 66, Clutch Issues
  • DvineProphet
  • Jan 23, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 26, 2024
Realmongo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?