• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

69 windsor heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter 289coupe66
  • Start date Start date Jun 23, 2008
2

289coupe66

New Member
Mar 5, 2008
24
0
0
Jun 23, 2008
#1
  • Jun 23, 2008
  • #1
a guy was asking me about my car yesterday as i was leaving work and while we were talking he mentioned he had a set of 69 windsor heads that he would trade me for a new holley carb from my work..i heard from a few people that 69 windsor heads are apparently the best head to put on a 289 or 302 without going up to an aluminum aftermarket set..anyone ever put a set on a 289? and is there any way to identify them so i can make sure im actually getting a set of 69 windsor heads?
 

Tubo(2-bo)

Member
Mar 25, 2004
279
0
16
Ft Walton Beach FL.
Jun 23, 2008
#2
  • Jun 23, 2008
  • #2
The castings are D0OE or sometimes ya find C9OE's. They respond to port matching, and exhaust relief. Definately old school, aluminum heads with 58cc chambers & 1.94-1.60's are much better, but for a long time the D0OE's were the best windsor head to get.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 23, 2008
#3
  • Jun 23, 2008
  • #3
They're good heads, but depending on their condition, he may be getting the better end of the stick with a new Holley carb. Especially if you're talking about list price on anything more than the std "1850" list 600.
 
2

289coupe66

New Member
Mar 5, 2008
24
0
0
Jun 23, 2008
#4
  • Jun 23, 2008
  • #4
i figure i if they are the D0OE's in good shape i might as well trade since i'll be able to talk my manager into giving me the carb for $200 so im thinking thats a pretty reasonable price for a set of heads
 

bdepedro

Member
Nov 6, 2006
362
2
19
Outer Banks, NC
Jun 23, 2008
#5
  • Jun 23, 2008
  • #5
I've got 351windsor heads on my 289 and for a low displacement engine, it screams. The heads were totally reworked including porting and polishing, roller rockers, springs, rods, etc... All this was done prior to my owning the car and I think that new alum heads would have probably been as good/better performance for the same or possibly less $$. That being said I wouldn't change anything at this point.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 24, 2008
#6
  • Jun 24, 2008
  • #6
289coupe66 said:
i figure i if they are the D0OE's in good shape i might as well trade since i'll be able to talk my manager into giving me the carb for $200 so im thinking thats a pretty reasonable price for a set of heads
Click to expand...

You're on the right track.
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Jun 24, 2008
#7
  • Jun 24, 2008
  • #7
I had a set on a 289 with 12.7:1 pistons (I figure about 11.5:1) and a small solid roller cam with a Offy 360 dual top tunnel ram. Put a Jerico behind it and slapped it into a '69 Mach I weighing about 3000# and ran 11.08 @ 119 as it's fastest time. 5.67 gears and 9x30 slicks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
684
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
506
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
760
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 21, 2026
86_Capri
S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
103
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Saturday at 6:42 AM
AeroCoupe
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?