• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

71-73 351W headers (w/PS)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Motophile
  • Start date Start date Sep 10, 2007
M

Motophile

New Member
Sep 9, 2007
3
0
0
WA
Sep 10, 2007
#1
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #1
All, first time on the board. Hi.

I have a '72 that I just dropped a 351W in and I have a major header problem. I bought Hooker 6208 1 3/4" headers and they don't fit...they REALLY don't fit. I made the [stupid] assumption that I was smarter than the Hooker people, since 71-73 was not on the application list. DOH!

Anyway, does anyone have a 71-73 with a 351W, with power steering, and headers? I'd really rather not use the ol' power steering relocation bracket. Hooker 6901 seem to be the ones, but shortys might work too.

Thanks,
Brad

P.S. Anyone looking for NEW Hooker 6208 Super Comp 1 3/4" engine swap headers 64-70 Mustang 351W? They're roughly $490 @ Summit and Jegs. I'd take $350 to get rid of them. PM me.
 
7

73nancy

New Member
Sep 9, 2007
27
0
0
Sep 11, 2007
#2
  • Sep 11, 2007
  • #2
i had the same problem but i have a 351c in my 73 mach. i bought the hookers because i love the tone but when i went to put them on we had tons of problems. i ended up cuting some of the motor mount bracket and then denting one header tube. i didnt see a diff in power engine didnt really mind it much. just if you make a dent make a smooth transition with it. good luck the ps bracket lower wouldnt make a diffrence in my case.
 

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Sep 11, 2007
#3
  • Sep 11, 2007
  • #3
I owe you picks. I'll get them tonight, I'm going to email myself a reminder right now.
 

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Sep 11, 2007
#4
  • Sep 11, 2007
  • #4
I tried to get some shots with my cell phone but they looked like crap. The headers I've got are the Headman Shortys http://store.summitracing.com/partd...840125+4294925080+4294889096+115&autoview=sku

They fit great, lots of clearance on all sides.

I'll get pics tomorrow.
 

RMODEL65

Member
Jul 6, 2005
313
1
18
brunswick ga
Sep 11, 2007
#5
  • Sep 11, 2007
  • #5
the 71-73 has an integral gm style p/s bracket there should be no problems with fitment needing to lower the anything
 
G

Gud T.B. Blown

Member
Dec 9, 2004
583
1
18
Sep 12, 2007
#6
  • Sep 12, 2007
  • #6
73nancy said:
i had the same problem but i have a 351c in my 73 mach. i bought the hookers because i love the tone but when i went to put them on we had tons of problems. i ended up cuting some of the motor mount bracket and then denting one header tube. i didnt see a diff in power engine didnt really mind it much. just if you make a dent make a smooth transition with it. good luck the ps bracket lower wouldnt make a diffrence in my case.
Click to expand...

I've got the Hooker long tube super comps in my '73 and I had no fitment problems at all.
 
M

Motophile

New Member
Sep 9, 2007
3
0
0
WA
Sep 12, 2007
#7
  • Sep 12, 2007
  • #7
All, Thanks for the info!

I didn't want to give up yet on the big tubes so I jacked up the front end last night and went in from the bottom. I think I might be able to make them fit...with a little 'cold working' of the pipes as mentioned before. Stay tuned.

jikelly - pictures would be great. Also, do you have stock heads? I've got World Products Windsor Sr. I'm just worried about the 'may not work on aftermarket heads' as listed on the Summit website. At any rate, $150 isn't bad! I was also looking at the Hedman Elite headers (for a lot more $$$).

Thanks again,
Brad
 
M

Motophile

New Member
Sep 9, 2007
3
0
0
WA
Sep 13, 2007
#8
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #8
The 6208's fit! And here's how it finished. There is a tab on the steering column, I think for the steering lock in park, now it's gone. Some twisting and turing, pushing and pulling, and the headers finally slid in.

Go figure! I guess Hooker can add 71-73 to their list on these.

Brad
 

Attachments

  • Side.webp
    49.4 KB · Views: 581
  • Top.webp
    36.9 KB · Views: 1,673

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Sep 14, 2007
#9
  • Sep 14, 2007
  • #9
I finally got my pics up on my website so you can view them.

These are how the headman shortys look on the drivers side. You can see there are no clearance issues with the steering system.



 

Attachments

  • driversidehead2.webp
    62.4 KB · Views: 368
  • driversidehead.webp
    91.8 KB · Views: 569

72 fastback

Member
Apr 4, 2006
146
3
19
Hamden Ct
Jan 21, 2011
#10
  • Jan 21, 2011
  • #10
Was this set up an automatic or a 4spd? Any problems when you bolted everthing together. I have a 351w wuth a top loader 4 spd.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
D
Headers - 302 in a 68
  • DAQ
  • Apr 4, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
699
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2024
Noobz347
Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
Progress Thread 1993 LX Hatch Progress
  • Mac131
  • Aug 24, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
210
Views
12K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 15, 2026
Mac131
D
Headers with Trick Flow heads and T5 Hydraulic clutch?
  • Dans68
  • Apr 7, 2020
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 8, 2020
wicked93gs
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?