• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

9" question

  • Thread starter Thread starter blue66tang
  • Start date Start date Jun 2, 2004

blue66tang

Founding Member
Jan 20, 2001
1,092
0
0
Medford, OR
Jun 2, 2004
#1
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #1
I just bought a 9" housing yesturaday with no brakes or anythign, just the housing. How wide should it be. What is the width of just the housing in 65 66 mustangs, not with brakes or axles in it or anything. Is 25 bucks a good deal for it. Its an early style. It doenst have the big bulg out the back. Its got the 2 dimples. Thanks.
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Jun 2, 2004
#2
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #2
If it had no bulge and has 2 dimples then it is a 57-59 variety of some type and a drop in for a 65-66 car. I hope you do have the axles.
 

blue66tang

Founding Member
Jan 20, 2001
1,092
0
0
Medford, OR
Jun 2, 2004
#3
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #3
No i dont have the axils but i grabed some out of a 65 66 mustang and they slid right in. I dont think it is the 57 58, it seems a little wide. I stood it up on end next to a 8" and it was a half an inch to long, but i dont know what 8" housing i had.
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Jun 2, 2004
#4
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #4
The axles might slide in but they are more than likely the wrong length. You are going to have to do some measuring with a pumpkin in it to determine the proper axle length for your housing and I hope you have or can find the right bearing retainer plates to match it. Sometimes good deals only seem that way on the surface.
 

RajunCajun

New Member
Nov 26, 2003
180
0
0
Jun 2, 2004
#5
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #5
65-66 Mustang 57.25 inches
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Jun 2, 2004
#6
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #6
I think those older axles are the bigger bearing axles as well.
 

blue66tang

Founding Member
Jan 20, 2001
1,092
0
0
Medford, OR
Jun 2, 2004
#7
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #7
RajunCajun said:
65-66 Mustang 57.25 inches
Click to expand...

That 57.25 inches is from axle flange to flang i think. What i am planing on doing is narrowing the housing to the 65 66 width and then just reusing the my old axles. That should work right, it also looks like my backing plates will bolt up too, but its hard to tell when my car is 3 hours a way from where i am right now.

I just ran out and measured the housing, from housing end to housing end its 52 7/8" wide. Anybody have the housing width on there 65 66. Thanks
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 3, 2004
#8
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #8
52 7/8 should be about right for a 57-59 Ford and a 65-66 Stang. Measure the distance between the spring pads, should be 43 inches for a Stang. If it is a 57-59 Ford 9" then I have one hanging in my shop that I can measure the axles for you to get the correct length. If you don't have the axles, then it would be a good time to go with 31 spline ones
 
V

vrooom

New Member
Apr 17, 2003
139
0
0
Midwest
Jun 3, 2004
#9
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #9
http://www.racecheep.com/Rear Tags.html
http://www.maliburacing.com/ford_9_inch/ford_nine_inch.htm
 

blue66tang

Founding Member
Jan 20, 2001
1,092
0
0
Medford, OR
Jun 3, 2004
#10
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #10
D.Hearne said:
52 7/8 should be about right for a 57-59 Ford and a 65-66 Stang. Measure the distance between the spring pads, should be 43 inches for a Stang. If it is a 57-59 Ford 9" then I have one hanging in my shop that I can measure the axles for you to get the correct length. If you don't have the axles, then it would be a good time to go with 31 spline ones
Click to expand...

The spring perches are 43" apart. I would like to keep my 28 spline axils because of money for one, and also because they have already been up graded to the heavier duty axils that ford made. The onse that dont taper down, and yes they can be shortend and resplined. Thangs guys for all your help.
 

blue66tang

Founding Member
Jan 20, 2001
1,092
0
0
Medford, OR
Jun 3, 2004
#11
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #11
D.Hearne said:
52 7/8 should be about right for a 57-59 Ford and a 65-66 Stang. Measure the distance between the spring pads, should be 43 inches for a Stang. If it is a 57-59 Ford 9" then I have one hanging in my shop that I can measure the axles for you to get the correct length. If you don't have the axles, then it would be a good time to go with 31 spline ones
Click to expand...

Could you measure that for me, that would be awsome. Also does yours have a drain plug in it. Mine has a drain plug and a fill plug. Thanks
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Jun 3, 2004
#12
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #12
Perhaps this will help:

http://www.mustangsandmore.com/ubb/FordRearDimensions.html

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 

SandSprite

Member
Feb 8, 2003
332
0
16
L.A., CA
Jun 3, 2004
#13
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #13
www.ultrastang.com should have all the info you need. IIRC, the 65-66 mustangs and the 57-59 housings are 52.25 or 52.5" (it's in the link). Sounds like you scored big! IF it is a 57-59 medium bearing housing, your old axles should work fine (brakes too).
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 4, 2004
#14
  • Jun 4, 2004
  • #14
blue66stang------ I didn't get a chance to measure those axles last night, I'll try to do it this afternoon. And yes, this one's got both a fill and drain hole. Also came with a WAR case center section ( looks just like the N case, without the N) and a Detroit locker
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 4, 2004
#15
  • Jun 4, 2004
  • #15
blue66tang---- axle measurements are 26 1/16 and 30 7/16.This is from the face of the stud flange where the wheel contacts the axle when bolted up, to the inside tip of the axle.
 
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
Jun 4, 2004
#16
  • Jun 4, 2004
  • #16
Here is a scan of my Currie invoice. Has all the specs

Currie Invoice
 

blue66tang

Founding Member
Jan 20, 2001
1,092
0
0
Medford, OR
Jun 5, 2004
#17
  • Jun 5, 2004
  • #17
Thanks guys. Ill keep you posted when i find stuff out. Its hard to figure things out when my car is somewhere else. I know this is a early housing, but i dont think it is a 57-59 car. Its just a little to wide i think. If i had enough room with my tires. I wouldnt even narrow it, but since i rub already i better get sit back to stock width. Maybe even a 1/4 narrower on bolth sids just so i can get a little bit biger tire under there. Thanks again
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
112
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
550
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 6, 2026
85GT4V
D
66 Coupe Progress Thread
  • DTCRAWLEY
  • Apr 19, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
43
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 17, 2026
DTCRAWLEY
D
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
625
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
215
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?