• Community Forums
  • The Welcome Wagon

91 2.3l Exhaust And Intake Questions.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adam taggart
  • Start date Start date Dec 9, 2017
A

Adam taggart

New Member
Dec 9, 2017
20
0
1
Dec 9, 2017
#1
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #1
To start, I'm very new. I bought a 91 mustang vert, with 26k original miles in really good shape but runs a really weak. Cruises fine but has no power at all it seems like. I am wondering what the pipe from the header that goes into the bottom of the factory air box is for?

I made my own cold air Intake and now the tube from the header just dangles down.

I havnt seen any posts about this tube.
It's not the egr I'm talking about either.

So after sitting for 12 years it's started right up and drove but what should I do to tune this thing up besides plugs and fuel filter/air filter?

It's the 2.3l by the way
 
Last edited by a moderator: Dec 9, 2017

Adieu

Easy there, this ain't a dating site.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 7, 2002
9,531
5,187
224
Dec 9, 2017
#2
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #2
Adam taggart said:
To start, I'm very new. I bought a 91 mustang vert, with 26k original miles in really good shape but runs a really weak. Cruises fine but has no power at all it seems like. I am wondering what the pipe from the header that goes into the bottom of the factory air box is for?

I made my own cold air Intake and now the tube from the header just dangles down.

I havnt seen any posts about this tube.
It's not the egr I'm talking about either.

So after sitting for 12 years it's started right up and drove but what should I do to tune this thing up besides plugs and fuel filter/air filter?
Click to expand...
That tube is the factory pre-heater tube. It was used to promote faster engine warm up in cold weather by feeding heated air from around the exhaust manifold to the airbox in certain conditions. It's not absolutely necessary unless required for smog checks in your area.

After sitting 12 years, change EVERY fluid, and give the brake system a very thorough inspection, you'll probably end up wanting to replace or rebuild calipers and wheel cylinders and bleed the system at the bare minimum.

A 2.3 having "no power at all" is a fairly normal feeling compared to 99% of all cars built in the last decade. 88 horsepower in a 3000+ lb car just isn't going to feel like much.
 
A

Adam taggart

New Member
Dec 9, 2017
20
0
1
Dec 9, 2017
#3
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #3
Thank you for the quick reply, have any pointers on making some quick tune up in the engine bay? I read about the egr valve and made a block off plate but it made it run worse with the plate installed?
 

Adieu

Easy there, this ain't a dating site.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 7, 2002
9,531
5,187
224
Dec 9, 2017
#4
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #4
Adam taggart said:
Thank you for the quick reply, have any pointers on making some quick tune up in the engine bay? I read about the egr valve and made a block off plate but it made it run worse with the plate installed?
Click to expand...
Disabling the EGR will make it run worse.
 
A

Adam taggart

New Member
Dec 9, 2017
20
0
1
Dec 9, 2017
#5
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #5
Thank you, do you know any good trick with the intake? To make it run better
 

Adieu

Easy there, this ain't a dating site.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 7, 2002
9,531
5,187
224
Dec 9, 2017
#6
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #6
Adam taggart said:
Thank you, do you know any good trick with the intake? To make it run better
Click to expand...
Not really. You could take it off and port it, but you'd be picking up single digit horsepower for a lot of work.

There are ways to make 2.3s make power, but they're all much deeper than simple bolt-ons and tricks.

https://www.powernationtv.com/episode/HP2012-16/building-a-competitive-dirt-track-engine
 

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
Discordia
Dec 13, 2017
#7
  • Dec 13, 2017
  • #7
Welcome to Stangnet.

Look through our ‘79-‘95 subforums. We have one four the four bangers there as well.

Post a picture or two of your mustang for us.

A turbo would make it more powerful.

It’s good to have you with us.
 

Adieu

Easy there, this ain't a dating site.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 7, 2002
9,531
5,187
224
Dec 13, 2017
#8
  • Dec 13, 2017
  • #8
Davedacarpainter said:
Welcome to Stangnet.

Look through our ‘79-‘95 subforums. We have one four the four bangers there as well.

Post a picture or two of your mustang for us.

A turbo would make it more powerful.

It’s good to have you with us.
Click to expand...
Have to upgrade the bottom end of the N/A 2.3 for a turbo. Cast pistons don't like boost.

Good news is, the crank journals and main caps on 2.3s are seriously beefy, and there are connecting rod and piston upgradres out there since these engines are still popular.
 

Boostedpimp

20+ Year Stangneter
May 8, 2003
1,451
493
154
NJ
Dec 13, 2017
#9
  • Dec 13, 2017
  • #9
Check your exhaust manifold for cracks.. it's common and robs allot of power. If so do the Ranger header swap. I did used a 93 header to replace the badly cracked stock manifold on mine and it made a big different. Not only does it weight twenty pounds less (26lbs vs 6lbs) but it also made a noticeable difference in throttle response and power. Not sure if most of the difference was from replacing a cracked manifold or if it's the tubular header design over the manifold.

I used mustang exhaust manifold gasket with the mustang bolts without issue. Only thing to look out for depending on what year and what you want to do is the EGR tube and o2 sensor port.
Rangers built with Cali emissions have the EGR tube, O2 sensor port and the hot air tube so they are a direct bolt up to the mustang.
The mustang EGR valve will accept the Ranger's EGR tube, but the Ranger header will not accept the mustang EGR tube. So make sure you get the EGR tube with the header if you are going to keep your EGR functional. Other Rangers other then cali I believe did not have the EGR tube or fitting
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
916
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
C
Hello from Alabama
  • Carl Moore
  • Sep 6, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
6
Views
326
The Welcome Wagon Sep 7, 2025
Mac131
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
574
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
261
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
2.3l tech
  • Techboi
  • Nov 6, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
269
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Nov 8, 2024
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Community Forums
  • The Welcome Wagon
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?