• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

94-95 Spark Tables Inside

  • Thread starter Thread starter final5-0
  • Start date Start date Jul 6, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Jul 7, 2005
#21
  • Jul 7, 2005
  • #21
final5-0 said:
Thats a great idea Greg........why don't you do that?



No ping with 87 ...... way to go

looks like your getting stuff dialed in pretty good

Later
Grady
Click to expand...


I would like to but I dont know how to post screen captrs?

I run prem. but when I tested it I ran a tank that had alot of 87 (5gal 87, 1gal prem.) in it and the fuel tables were stock but I had pinging with 10* on the dizzy before I bought the tweecer. If I bought prem. from anything but Mobil I would get pinging somewere in the rpm band since I bought the car in 99.

Actualy since I got # 6 and 7 to get fuel again I realy have not had to do much tweecing, I am bumd' out as I was hoping for issues so I could develope some problem solving skills with tuning. All I realy have is transfered the GT MAF curve to the J4J1, fan settings, rpm/speed limits, fuel/spark tables set up for proper control, tip in retard (the shifting * thing) and messed with diff. inj. timing setups. The idle is a bit rich on cold startup but that is it. My part throt. bucking I had before is gone now.
 
B

bayellowstang

Member
Apr 25, 2003
462
0
17
Carlisle, PA
Jul 7, 2005
#22
  • Jul 7, 2005
  • #22
final5-0 said:
Steve

Its no seceret really but I'm not gonna go the trouble to copy, paste, host, and bla, bla, bla, all that stuff again, lol.

I just had the total amount of spark I wanted in by 2500 and you can use the top or top two load rows for your WOT conditions.

I've thought about playing with the ls but when I talk to peeps with mild na combos like mine, some say it did not make much if any difference.

Later
Grady
Click to expand...

The LS made a huge difference for me. It was/is the first thing I did though. It may not make a dif. if you already have the timing and fuel tables done for your car. I was seeing 150% load undet WOT and 50% at cruise. Now its 20-25% at cruise and 102% was max i've seen at WOT.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 7, 2005
#23
  • Jul 7, 2005
  • #23
bayellowstang said:
The LS made a huge difference for me. It was/is the first thing I did though. It may not make a dif. if you already have the timing and fuel tables done for your car. I was seeing 150% load undet WOT and 50% at cruise. Now its 20-25% at cruise and 102% was max i've seen at WOT.
Click to expand...

Well Steve

Not all of us have big, bad boy strokers to make our Stangs push loads to the amount yours does.

My teeny tiny little 302 just barely makes it to the 120% load range and it really doesnt bother me too much. If it was much higher, I might put a higher priority on playing with it a bit.

Did you change the cid scalar to match the size of your new displacement?

Later
Grady
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 7, 2005
#24
  • Jul 7, 2005
  • #24
blksn955.o said:
I would like to but I dont know how to post screen captrs?

I run prem. but when I tested it I ran a tank that had alot of 87 (5gal 87, 1gal prem.) in it and the fuel tables were stock but I had pinging with 10* on the dizzy before I bought the tweecer. If I bought prem. from anything but Mobil I would get pinging somewere in the rpm band since I bought the car in 99.

Actualy since I got # 6 and 7 to get fuel again I realy have not had to do much tweecing, I am bumd' out as I was hoping for issues so I could develope some problem solving skills with tuning. All I realy have is transfered the GT MAF curve to the J4J1, fan settings, rpm/speed limits, fuel/spark tables set up for proper control, tip in retard (the shifting * thing) and messed with diff. inj. timing setups. The idle is a bit rich on cold startup but that is it. My part throt. bucking I had before is gone now.
Click to expand...

I know you've had a lot on your plate lately but.....................................

When are we gonna get to see some dyno pulls now that you've got things like they should be?

I'm looking forward to seeing the progress

Later
Grady
 

5.0_GT_kid

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 18, 2004
1,155
1
39
Largo, Florida
Jul 7, 2005
#25
  • Jul 7, 2005
  • #25
Well this is a great post, makes me want to get a Tweecer even more!
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Jul 7, 2005
#26
  • Jul 7, 2005
  • #26
Yet another quality thread from the "old man" Grady.

I just started to get back into messing with the Tweecer just this past week. I lost all the knowledge that I had about the stupid thing.

This thread is going into my "Tweecer folder" (for when I get my car running again).

Thanks Grady!

Joe
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Jul 8, 2005
#27
  • Jul 8, 2005
  • #27
final5-0 said:
I know you've had a lot on your plate lately but.....................................

When are we gonna get to see some dyno pulls now that you've got things like they should be?

I'm looking forward to seeing the progress

Later
Grady
Click to expand...

I cannot wait myself,

I might have found a job (well I work now but that was/is the job I had in college). Should know more by mid. end of next week. That would mean more time (spare time energy) and money to get the thing on the dyno. There have been several members here who have helped me out with things that I want to get good numbers for myself as well as them for the help they gave.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 8, 2005
#28
  • Jul 8, 2005
  • #28
blksn955.o said:
I cannot wait myself,

I might have found a job (well I work now but that was/is the job I had in college). Should know more by mid. end of next week. That would mean more time (spare time energy) and money to get the thing on the dyno. There have been several members here who have helped me out with things that I want to get good numbers for myself as well as them for the help they gave.
Click to expand...

Gotta get a good job so you can take care of that new bride, lol

Later
Grady
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Jul 8, 2005
#29
  • Jul 8, 2005
  • #29
Yep. lol
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
407
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
  • Poll Poll
Fox Foxtoberfest 2025: Registration open!
  • FastDriver
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
116
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 13, 2025
TripleYellow
Idle spark confusion
  • sav22rem22
  • Oct 26, 2023
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
2
Views
2K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Nov 1, 2023
sav22rem22
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?