95 Mustang GT Vs. 94 Camaro Z28

xc_myers_06

New Member

Aug 6, 2004

64

0

0

Nebraska

Nov 3, 2006

#1

• Nov 3, 2006

• #1

In A Race, Both cars are bone stock. The mustang is a covertible whereas the camaro is a coupe. who would win? reasons why?

What do you guys think are the pro's and con's of the matchup?

 

MI95Cobra

New Member

Aug 20, 2006

451

1

0

Oklahoma City

Nov 3, 2006

#2

• Nov 3, 2006

• #2

well...not sure, but the gt would be a little heavier being a convertible....i watched pinks last night and they had a 1988 mustang (500hp)vs 1989 firebird (600hp)(practically camaro)....the mustang spanked him until his motor blew up and caught on fire....what kind of tires are on both cars???

 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run

15 Year Member

Nov 29, 1999

3,133

18

108

Chicagoland

Nov 3, 2006

#3

• Nov 3, 2006

• #3

Camaro will win. 275 HP, probably a 3.23 or 3.42 rear end from the factory, lighter, etc. The convertible Mustang is too heavy with only 215 HP and if it's yours with the AODE, the Camaro will have you by quite a bit. There's probably a full second difference in the 1/4 mile between the two.

 

xc_myers_06

New Member

Aug 6, 2004

64

0

0

Nebraska

Nov 3, 2006

#4

• Nov 3, 2006

• #4

Both Are Auto

 

S

speedytang

Founding Member

Jul 28, 1999

765

1

17

Marengo,Ohio,US

Nov 3, 2006

#5

• Nov 3, 2006

• #5

Camaro by 5 lengths if not more.

 

ProKiller

Founding Member

Apr 26, 2002

3,064

15

78

PA

Nov 3, 2006

#6

• Nov 3, 2006

• #6

camaro FTW

 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.

Founding Member

Nov 29, 1999

5,676

1

76

Altoona, PA

Nov 3, 2006

#7

• Nov 3, 2006

• #7

Stock versus stock, the camaro will win by a substantial margin.

 

diablostang

New Member

Sep 21, 2004

425

0

0

Raleigh, NC

Nov 3, 2006

#8

• Nov 3, 2006

• #8

Killercanary said:

Stock versus stock, the camaro will win by a substantial margin.

Click to expand...

Especially comparing a Mustang auto to a Camaro auto... No comparison, lol.

 

9

95silvergt5.0

Member

Nov 29, 2004

113

0

16

Nov 3, 2006

#9

• Nov 3, 2006

• #9

ford autos pretty much blow

 

9

95five-oh

New Member

Jun 25, 2006

158

0

0

Mount Airy, MD

Nov 3, 2006

#10

• Nov 3, 2006

• #10

even though the LT1 is not the motor the LS1 is, it would still beat a stock 302 handily. 5.7L vs. only 5.0L

 

Black95GTS

Active Member

Jan 8, 2004

1,644

3

38

Marlborough, MA

Nov 3, 2006

#11

• Nov 3, 2006

• #11

Don't underestimate the "LT Fun." Stang loses by quite a bit.

Adam

 

TheDamned

"I am Canadian and Damned for it!"

Jul 22, 2003

457

0

48

Montréal, Québec, Canada

Nov 3, 2006

#12

• Nov 3, 2006

• #12

camaro win

 

Pokageek

Active Member

Jun 10, 2005

2,767

0

46

MA, USA

Nov 3, 2006

#13

• Nov 3, 2006

• #13

Camaro will blow it away hands down. It will pull hard thru 125MPH. They are practically the same weight within 25 pounds.

 

1TallMF

New Member

Apr 17, 2006

955

1

0

Montreal

Nov 3, 2006

#14

• Nov 3, 2006

• #14

haha I was in this exact scenario a few months ago, except mine's a 5spd. My buddy Joe has a stock '95 Z28 auto. Only mods are a 2300 stall converter, and a rebuilt tranny with a shift kit and corvette internals ( ). From a 30mph roll, we were neck-and-neck all the way up to 100mph when we both let off (this was done on an open 4-lane highway at night, no traffic). I was quite surprised I was able to stay with him, as all I've got done to the car to make it faster are the 3.73's. Those cars are surprisingly heavy, like Pokageek said, I'm pretty sure his car slighly outweighs mine by a small amount.

We're planning to head to the track next summer after I do some spring-time upgrades, and he gets a new paint job . I'm anxious to see what the outcome will be.

 

Pokageek

Active Member

Jun 10, 2005

2,767

0

46

MA, USA

Nov 3, 2006

#15

• Nov 3, 2006

• #15

I had a 94 LT1 auto. Ran 14.0 stock and 13.5 with cai and headers. My mustang is just starting to feel fast. I don't know why but mine blew away most other z28's. I got in a 95 SS that felt slow as hell.

 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep

Mar 30, 2005

1,940

3

36

North Carolina

Nov 3, 2006

#16

• Nov 3, 2006

• #16

Pokageek said:

I got in a 95 SS that felt slow as hell.

Click to expand...

There was no SS in 1995. 1996-2002 only .... excluding the early 70's and prior.

 

Engel

Member

Apr 2, 2005

219

0

16

Currently Fort Walton Beach

Nov 3, 2006

#17

• Nov 3, 2006

• #17

camaro would rock you so hard youd probably get depressed

 

xr8d302

I bought a 27" monitor to compensate for my lack o

Apr 29, 2004

1,113

0

36

Medicine Hat, AB

Nov 3, 2006

#18

• Nov 3, 2006

• #18

Mustang easily would win.










Sorry, I just like to go against the grain.

 

Pokageek

Active Member

Jun 10, 2005

2,767

0

46

MA, USA

Nov 3, 2006

#19

• Nov 3, 2006

• #19

SeventyMach1 said:

There was no SS in 1995. 1996-2002 only .... excluding the early 70's and prior.

Click to expand...

I knew someone was going to get technical. It was an SS. Unbelievably slow too. It didn't shift past 5200. Weird.

 

Mustangless

Member

Jun 27, 2003

903

1

18

home

Nov 3, 2006

#20

• Nov 3, 2006

• #20

mustang would win.... in the with better looks, but would lose in a race