• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

95Bluestallion's head swap pic thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95BlueStallion
  • Start date Start date May 27, 2010
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

95BlueStallion

My assy trans to myself
15 Year Member
Feb 22, 2007
5,125
3,091
214
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Jun 3, 2010
#21
  • Jun 3, 2010
  • #21
alleymad95GT said:
Nah, I don't think so...

You are drowning it even more by having the undersized MAF. Think about it like this...

A 24# injector puts in some fuel per pulse (keeping it simple, as pressure and duration will affect this as well, but conceptually it will be accurate). Lets say that is amount X.

A 42# injector also puts in some fuel per pulse. Obviously, when the 42# injector pulses, it pulses more than a 24# injector, right? How else would it flow so much more fuel? So, lets say the 42 # flows an amount of fuel equal to X + Y.

Now, X + Y is obviously bigger than X. Of course. Bigger injector.

Now, your 24 # MAF. It gets some air flowing over it. That air flow is translated into a voltage that is sent to the computer. Lets say at some airflow, that voltage is A.

Now, at out hypothetical airflow (whatever it may be), voltage A tells the injector to pulse exactly whatever our hypothetical fuel value X was. Now, what happens if you send the computer voltage A, but you have the 42 # injector in there? Well, the injector pulses X + Y fuel. You see the problem?

A calibrated MAF effectively shifts the curve of the MAF function. The MAF knows how much air your combo is sucking through it. That is its entire purpose. It sends a signal to the computer based on that air flow. Your problem is it is seeing some airflow and sending a signal that will deliver the proper fuel if you had 24 # injectors. You are way rich since the 42 # injectors are so much bigger.

Will the car be the BEST that it possibly can be? No. It will probably be hard as hell to start. Can you get it running really well by prudent adjustments of fuel pressure? You bet. I bet you it will do just fine once it is started.

JMHO, of course...
Click to expand...

You have a valid point my friend.

Jinx, I already have the 42's in there now.

JJ, I didnt think to pull the spout. I'll try that for giggles. I marked the dizzy before taking it out, so it should be right at the stock timing assuming I got it put in with cylinder 1 on the correct stroke. Im pretty confident of that though.
 

95BlueStallion

My assy trans to myself
15 Year Member
Feb 22, 2007
5,125
3,091
214
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Jun 13, 2010
#22
  • Jun 13, 2010
  • #22
Well like I said in my chip request thread, I got her to fire up and idle by pulling out my old chip from the computer. I dont know how it worked, but it did. I have the power steering bled at least, but I cant wait to get my chip and get it back on the road. I will have more pics and a couple videos once I get the chip!
 

95BlueStallion

My assy trans to myself
15 Year Member
Feb 22, 2007
5,125
3,091
214
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Jun 13, 2010
#23
  • Jun 13, 2010
  • #23
Here is a video of the car starting up. I had to make sure the dizzy was still in all the way, cause I havent bolted it down yet until I set my timing. Dont mind me turning the wheels, just making sure the new power steering pump is fully bled. You can see that I cant really rev it or it tries to die, might be because of drinking twice the amount of fuel it needs, no EGR, no smog... not sure which one.

http://s298.photobucket.com/albums/mm276/Iowabiggun/?action=view&current=013.mp4
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
801
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
help me understand calibrated maf sensors and injectors
  • stackz
  • Sep 21, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?