• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Accuracy Of Sct Livewire

  • Thread starter Thread starter COramprat
  • Start date Start date Aug 17, 2014

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Aug 17, 2014
#1
  • Aug 17, 2014
  • #1
Getting an air/fuel reading through Livewire and ODB port...is it an accurate reading or would a gauge be better?
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
Aug 18, 2014
#2
  • Aug 18, 2014
  • #2
How are you getting a reading through the OBDII? The stock O2 sensors are narrowbands, not widebands. The only way I know of to get a AFR is with an external wideband, which can be wired up via a firewire cable to feed into the SCT X3 and therefore be monitored by Livewire. That's the way I do it for datalogging.
 

flstang65

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2007
1,484
135
94
SE Georgia
Aug 19, 2014
#3
  • Aug 19, 2014
  • #3
I thought it could read it off the car computer?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,034
21,207
234
Box behind Walmart
Aug 19, 2014
#4
  • Aug 19, 2014
  • #4
Probably from a Blutooth device.

It's pretty accurate. Accurate enough that it would be difficult to find differences on a printed AFR graph.
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
Aug 19, 2014
#5
  • Aug 19, 2014
  • #5
flstang65 said:
I thought it could read it off the car computer?
Click to expand...

Noobz347 said:
Probably from a Blutooth device.

It's pretty accurate. Accurate enough that it would be difficult to find differences on a printed AFR graph.
Click to expand...

Unless I'm mistaken, it's a hardware thing. Up until recently, the O2 sensors were narrowbands, not widebands. So even the PCM does not know what the AFR is outside of a very narrow range (+/- a couple tenths from stoich), and even then, it really only knows if it is lean or rich, not an exact value.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,034
21,207
234
Box behind Walmart
Aug 19, 2014
#6
  • Aug 19, 2014
  • #6
sneaky98gt said:
Unless I'm mistaken, it's a hardware thing. Up until recently, the O2 sensors were narrowbands, not widebands. So even the PCM does not know what the AFR is outside of a very narrow range (+/- a couple tenths from stoich), and even then, it really only knows if it is lean or rich, not an exact value.
Click to expand...


OBD2 Makes an estimation. I should maybe say 'most'. I'm not sure. My suburban calculates one and when I visually compare the graphs, there were few anomalies. I use the TORQUE app. No idea how much is calculated through the app and how much though the EEC. The comparison was a tail sniffer set to that specific mode.

I'm sure that digital readouts from each would show more variance. This was only a visual compare of graphs.
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
Aug 19, 2014
#7
  • Aug 19, 2014
  • #7
Noobz347 said:
OBD2 Makes an estimation. I should maybe say 'most'. I'm not sure. My suburban calculates one and when I visually compare the graphs, there were few anomalies. I use the TORQUE app. No idea how much is calculated through the app and how much though the EEC. The comparison was a tail sniffer set to that specific mode.

I'm sure that digital readouts from each would show more variance. This was only a visual compare of graphs.
Click to expand...

I still don't understand how it could "estimate" the actual AFR. There are so many things that can affect that (tip in/tip out, coasting fuel shut off, O2 sensor bias, transient fuel, etc.). The only thing I can figure is that it might be reading the commanded AFR, which is what it's supposed to be, and not what it actually is. But I don't know how the computer could read or estimate the AFR with only a narrowband sensor.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,034
21,207
234
Box behind Walmart
Aug 19, 2014
#8
  • Aug 19, 2014
  • #8
sneaky98gt said:
I still don't understand how it could "estimate" the actual AFR. There are so many things that can affect that (tip in/tip out, coasting fuel shut off, O2 sensor bias, transient fuel, etc.). The only thing I can figure is that it might be reading the commanded AFR, which is what it's supposed to be, and not what it actually is. But I don't know how the computer could read or estimate the AFR with only a narrowband sensor.
Click to expand...


One of the options is to read the commanded AFR. It does take readings from the 02 sensors. It combines them with whatever other inputs it uses to calculate AFR. Keep in min that this is on a stock vehicle. Results could be different if the AFR were to dip into territory outside of the normal range of a narrow band. If the EEC it's doing it's job, then that doesn't happen very often.
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
Aug 21, 2014
#9
  • Aug 21, 2014
  • #9
Noobz347 said:
One of the options is to read the commanded AFR. It does take readings from the 02 sensors. It combines them with whatever other inputs it uses to calculate AFR. Keep in min that this is on a stock vehicle. Results could be different if the AFR were to dip into territory outside of the normal range of a narrow band. If the EEC it's doing it's job, then that doesn't happen very often.
Click to expand...

Happens every time you go WOT. And WOT is really the only time you should be concerned about what the AFR is, considering the O2's keep it around stoich at part throttle (barring severe mechanical issues). And still, there's no way the computer can accurately estimate the AFR outside of the narrowband range.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,034
21,207
234
Box behind Walmart
Aug 21, 2014
#10
  • Aug 21, 2014
  • #10
sneaky98gt said:
Happens every time you go WOT. And WOT is really the only time you should be concerned about what the AFR is, considering the O2's keep it around stoich at part throttle (barring severe mechanical issues). And still, there's no way the computer can accurately estimate the AFR outside of the narrowband range.
Click to expand...

It does a better job than you might think. It's not very expensive to experiment with either.

Purchase the app and a bluetooth interface. I think is app is like $5 and the interface $15.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
03 Cobra Low Fuel Pressure
  • CTsnake_03
  • Mar 17, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
239
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
CTsnake_03
C
T
Progress Thread 2002 Mustang 3.8L CV
  • TheIncompetentMechanic
  • May 26, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
69
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
TheIncompetentMechanic
T
C
4375 auto meter air/fuel gauge
  • Canadianfox
  • Jul 27, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
0
Views
108
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jul 27, 2025
Canadianfox
C
M
01 mustang 3.8 fuel pressure issue
  • Mhaley2006
  • May 29, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
122
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 29, 2026
Mhaley2006
M
E
Chasing Vacuum leak 99 GT
  • EBNS_2005
  • May 2, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
144
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 3, 2026
X-cam34
X
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?