• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Engine ACT Code 54 "Sensor circuit open"

  • Thread starter Thread starter k19driver
  • Start date Start date Nov 29, 2019

k19driver

New Member
Jun 4, 2008
6
0
1
Redwood City California
Nov 29, 2019
#1
  • Nov 29, 2019
  • #1
Hope this finds you all well.
What I have is a ’93 5.0 stroked to 347. It’s in a 1993 Volvo 940 wagon. Tuned a few years ago by the engine builder at his Sears Point shop.
It passed CA smog checks without too much sweat. The last few weeks I've been occupied doing some engine compartment clean-up. Removing most of the old production line connectors and cleaning up the vacuum hoses. It is still EEC-IV.
After everything was back together, before initial start up I clipped in my Innova EEC-IV Ford code reader.

KOEO: I get a 15 (EEC (PCM) Read Only Memory (ROM) test failed)
then a 54 (Intake Air charge temperature sensor circuit open)
The amazing thing is code 11 shows up after the second group finishes.

Check engine light is ON

The ECU is an X3Z.
I ran a new wire from the ACT sensor (also new) to pin 25. VREF is 5.05 vdc
Temp: 60F Sensor voltage is 4.76 vdc Resistance across sensor terminals is 42.6 K ohms. Both readouts appear to be in range.
Two new Motorcraft O2 sensors installed.
I drove the car yesterday. Seemed to run ok. CK Engine Light on the whole time…
Not sure to how to determine if the ACT sensor data is being seen by the ECU considering the last code seen is a 11
.
If anyone can think of anything else I might try…

Best regards all...
jeff
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Nov 29, 2019
#2
  • Nov 29, 2019
  • #2
Code 51 Engine Coolant Temperature (ECT) sensor signal is/was too high -

[color= blue]Revised 6-Apr-2017 to add diagrams and resistance check for ECT wiring.[/color]

Possible bad ECT sensor or wiring. Possible missing signal ground – black/wire broken or bad connection. With the power off, measure the resistance between the black/white wire and battery ground. You should see less than 1 ohm. Check the same black /white wire on the TPS and MAP sensor. More than 1 ohm there and the wire is probably broken in the harness between the engine and the computer. The 10 pin connectors pass the black/white wire back to the computer, and can cause problems.

The computer Engine Coolant Temperature sensor has absolutely nothing to do with the temperature gauge. They are different animals. The ECT sensor is normally located it the passenger side front of the engine in the water feed tubes for the heater. It has two wires that connect by a weathertight plastic connector.

The water temperature sender for the temp gauge is located in the driver's side lower intake manifold. It has a single wire that connects by a push on connector on the temp sender.


If you have replaced the ECT sensor and are still having ECT like problem symptoms, check the ECT wiring .






See the graphic for the 10 pin connector circuit layout.


Check the resistance of the green wire on the ECT connector to the green wire on pin 7 of the computer connector. You should see less that 1 Ω (ohm)

Use Pin 46 on the computer for ground for both ECT & ACT tests to get most accurate readings.

Pin 7 on the computer - ECT signal in. At 176 degrees F it should be .80 volts

Pin 25 on the computer - ACT signal in. At 50 degrees F it should be 3.5 volts. It is a good number if the ACT is mounted in the inlet airbox. If it is mounted in the lower intake manifold, the voltage readings will be lower because of the heat transfer.

50 degrees F = 3.52 v
68 degrees F = 3.02 v
86 degrees F = 2.62 v
104 degrees F = 2.16 v
122 degrees F = 1.72 v
140 degrees F = 1.35 v
158 degrees F = 1.04 v
176 degrees F = .80 v
194 degrees F = .61
212 degrees F = .47 v
230 degrees F = .36 v
248 degrees F = .28 v

Ohms measures at the computer with the computer disconnected, or at the sensor with the sensor disconnected.

50 degrees F = 58.75 K ohms
68 degrees F = 37.30 K ohms
86 degrees F = 27.27 K ohms
104 degrees F = 16.15 K ohms
122 degrees F = 10.97 K ohms
140 degrees F = 7.60 K ohms
158 degrees F = 5.37 K ohms
176 degrees F = 3.84 K ohms
194 degrees F = 2.80 K ohms
212 degrees F = 2.07 K ohms
230 degrees F = 1.55 K ohms
248 degrees F = 1.18 k ohms

Diagram courtesy of Tmoss & Stang&2birds



See the following website for some help from Tmoss (diagram designer) & Stang&2Birds (website host) for help on 88-95 wiring http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/

http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/IgnitionSwitchWiring.gif

http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/fuel-alt-links-ign-ac.gif

http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/88-91_5.0_EEC_Wiring_Diagram.gif
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Dec 2, 2019
#3
  • Dec 2, 2019
  • #3
Where was the ACT physically installed on the engine? Intake manifold or intake tubing?
 

k19driver

New Member
Jun 4, 2008
6
0
1
Redwood City California
Dec 3, 2019
#4
  • Dec 3, 2019
  • #4
The ACT is located on the lower intake manifold. I may have stumbled across the reason for the 54 code. I removed the ACT sensor, checked the shared signal return to pin 46 resistance. 1.19 ohms. Not good... Clipped it off ACT cannon plug and jumped it to the ECT signal return. Ran Self-Test... no codes!
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,144
17,839
224
Massachusetts
Dec 3, 2019
#5
  • Dec 3, 2019
  • #5
X3m with an aftermarket MAF. I assume you are tuned for that combo?
 

k19driver

New Member
Jun 4, 2008
6
0
1
Redwood City California
Dec 3, 2019
#6
  • Dec 3, 2019
  • #6
Yes, it was tuned for the MAF. Not sure if the X3Z is the best choice... I became caretaker to the car when the gentleman who originally swapped in the engine maybe 20 years ago passed away in 2007. It was was set up for autocross and track driving. I would like to be more involved in the tuning aspects. The whole process kind of intimidates me. The Tweecer RT interface is in place- but I have yet to use it.




rt
 
Last edited: Dec 3, 2019

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Dec 3, 2019
#7
  • Dec 3, 2019
  • #7
k19driver said:
The ACT is located on the lower intake manifold. I may have stumbled across the reason for the 54 code. I removed the ACT sensor, checked the shared signal return to pin 46 resistance. 1.19 ohms. Not good... Clipped it off ACT cannon plug and jumped it to the ECT signal return. Ran Self-Test... no codes!
Click to expand...
Not sure I'm following... are you suspecting the ACT plug, or the ACT itself?

If the tune was done properly, then it doesn't matter what factory ecu you start with. Most factory differences were minimal anyway.
 

k19driver

New Member
Jun 4, 2008
6
0
1
Redwood City California
Dec 3, 2019
#8
  • Dec 3, 2019
  • #8
Thanks for responding- I suspect my talents as a wire splicer...and an inexpensive replacement ACT sensor. Perhaps I did not pay close enough attention to my splices. What started all of this was I removed all of the original production wire harness connectors. Tested and mapped out the pin locations for future reference. But I failed at checking the quality of my work. Lesson learned.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
702
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
M
Progress Thread 1993 Ford Mustang 5.0 convertible stock manual - ODB Codes shows running lean
  • mcalvo
  • Feb 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 22, 2025
AeroCoupe
G
2006 Mustang GT o2 Sensor Wiring Issue Car Bogging/Choking
  • GCantero93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
772
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Sep 6, 2025
Noobz347
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
646
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?