• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Advice for a set of heads and intake for a 347cu.

  • Thread starter Thread starter ramjetlx
  • Start date Start date Nov 16, 2005

ramjetlx

New Member
Apr 8, 2005
212
0
0
Honolulu, Hawaii
Nov 16, 2005
#1
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #1
I just broke in my 347 stroker and now Im looking to throw on some heads and an intake. It doesnt have to be emissions legal since I removed the smog equipment. Im looking for a good powerband between 1500-6500 rpms. Im looking for more mid-high rpm power since I have more torque now. However I need it to be able to just bolt on with no modifications from machining. Im not building a race only car. Its a daily driven street car that sees weekend duty at the dragstrip. Its speed density for now but I know I might have to change it to mass air later. The car runs okay right now after the stroker, so it doesnt need it for now. Any expirances or help would be greatly appreciated.
 

justinkendell

New Member
Jun 30, 2005
16
0
0
Nov 17, 2005
#2
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #2
Edelbrock Vic JR's with Holley Systemax U/L Intake
 

aleborjas

New Member
Sep 11, 2005
610
0
0
Nov 17, 2005
#3
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #3
vic JR's are too big for a 347 N/A you need intake flow velocity get some 185's part#1388 and the holley or RPMII intake!
 
C

crazyquik50

New Member
Dec 2, 2002
243
0
0
47
in the garage
yahoo.com
Nov 17, 2005
#4
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #4
reply

I do not know what camshaft you are using, to get the full potential. I would throw on a set of Dart Pro 1 195's or the TFS street heats, depending on cam. As far as an intake is concerned you can't hardly go wrong with the good old Systemax.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Nov 17, 2005
#5
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #5
aleborjas said:
vic JR's are too big for a 347 N/A you need intake flow velocity get some 185's part#1388 and the holley or RPMII intake!
Click to expand...

LOL, that HAS to be a joke!!

Another vote for the victor jr's. I'd use victor jr heads, custom cam/springs, TFS r or victor 5.0 manifold, 1 3/4" longtubes

Check this out:

http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2005/02/YellowFever/index.php
 

JCVERT

Member
Nov 18, 2004
43
0
6
Lynden
Nov 17, 2005
#6
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #6
I just got January 06 issue of 5.0 Mustang today and they tested the new BBK SSI, FRPP GT-40, Edelbrock Performer RPM II, Holley Systemax II, and Trick Flow Track Heat intakes on a 347, and in the end of the article I'll quote " the Performer RPM II was this test's top dog-the only in take to sneak past the 450hp barrier. It posted the highest peak power, both in rpm and horsepower, and it hangs on to its power-making potential longer than the other intakes. Some of these trends are not huge, but they are pronounced enough to label the RPM II as the most horsepower-friendly intake here." Not saying its the best for your combo though....
 

DemonGT

Founding Member
May 24, 2002
871
51
49
Sparta,WI
Nov 18, 2005
#7
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #7
afr 185's with holly sysmax intake or vic jr heads and a TFS R intake
 

SQUEEZE&STROKE

New Member
Jun 24, 2005
0
0
0
SOUTHERN CA
Nov 18, 2005
#8
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #8
Victor Jr's all the way. I ahd victor jr's on my 302 and they worked great! I now have them on my 331 carbed application and it makes 406 the the wheels at just under 6500 rpm
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,037
1,625
194
NJ
Nov 18, 2005
#9
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #9
Victor jr.s are just the right head, either them or the Twisted wedges that are Cnc'ed.
The street heats are great heads too, but i believe they require a header that only mac makes, that aren't so good, because they don't mate up to a normal shorty h pipe very well, and they are long tubes, that may also interfere with the steering shaft.
RPm II intake.
I hear the holley is a good 347 intake, but have not see that in person, so i really have no opinion as of yet.

The victor is a better intake for a race car, especially one that likes to goto 7000+ rpm. Probably not optimal for a DD.

Whatever heads you buy will likely need a valve job, and spring seat pressure check, regardless.
 
R

rogers

Founding Member
Feb 25, 2002
339
0
0
Nov 18, 2005
#10
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #10
Another vote for the Victor Jr heads. I would run a Victor 5.0 intake as well. I have used the RPM 2 intake and was not very impressed.
 
R

rflow50

New Member
Jun 18, 2005
172
0
0
TX
Nov 18, 2005
#11
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #11
I also have a 347. My combo is TFS twisted wedge heads with a TFS street intake. they work awsome, now that i have a SC i need more intake so I am probalbly going with a TFS-R series or the new trick flow intake the Box-R.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Intake
  • James S
  • Jul 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
199
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2026
James S
J
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
938
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
769
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
225
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
753
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?