• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Advice on building a rearend

  • Thread starter Thread starter SadbutTrue
  • Start date Start date Jan 28, 2004

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Jan 28, 2004
#1
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #1
There are several rear-end vendors on ebay that have very high approval ratings. It seems that if I were to use my current 8" axles and brakes, I could get a rearend for a pretty affordable price and piece it together with a case of some sort, possibly from the same vendor.

Would you recommend this? How hard is it to put together a rearend, if I were extremely careful and took my time with it? What can go wrong? I can't really afford to go to my local shop and have them build me a completely new rear for $12-1500 as I've been quoted. But I need a rearend, badly.

Any advice is appreciated..
 
G

GaPonyFarm

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
663
0
0
Columbus, GA
Jan 29, 2004
#2
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #2
Your 8" stuff won't work... but from what I see about your car, you don't "need" a 9" rear anyway. A mild 351 won't break an 8", especially with an automatic tranny. If you want positraction... you can swap in an 8" posi pumpkin - check with your local powertrain shop for a used one and put some 3.25, 3.55, or 4.10 gears in it. Should be able to get it done for $450 (parts & labor) from a good shop.

If you don't know how to setup a rearend, its virtually impossible to do correctly.

You'll be better off finding a used rearend in a boneyard, or better yet, a swap meet. It should be extremely easy to find a 9" unit is Cali.... if you really want one.
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Jan 29, 2004
#3
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #3
I picked up a 8" 4 spider 3.80 rear from this vendor on ebay for $555 shipped to my door. Includes new Strange gears, rebuilt 3rd member, and new clutch pack in the traction lock unit. I am mating this behind a ~325hp 289 and a T5. It is for my daily driver with occasional drags and autocrossing events.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Jan 29, 2004
#4
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #4
well problem is i don't plan on my 351 staying like this for long...
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Jan 29, 2004
#5
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #5
I like my 9 inchers and the one in the car came from Currie. Give them a call.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Jan 29, 2004
#6
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #6
GaPonyFarm said:
Your 8" stuff won't work... QUOTE]

Not true, if he has a 9" the same width as his 8", and has the smaller housing ends and a 28 spline section in his 9" pumpkin, the 28 spline axles from the 8" and the backing plates and drum brakes will work on a 9". One of my best friends has this exact setup in his '67 coupe.

While this is all fine and dandy, 31 spline axles are stronger, so you'd have to upgrade in the future anyway if you're making a decent amount of HP. A 8" will hold up to about 400 HP small block, so I'm guessing about 300 ft/lb of torque.
Click to expand...
 

TurboDoctor

Founding Member
Jan 27, 2002
1,008
2
38
San Marcos, Texas(Austin)
Jan 29, 2004
#7
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #7
Are you wanting the entire rear end or just to update to posi track and change gear ratios or something like that ?? I would just buy detriot locker and a new set of gears and rebuild kit from summit or jegs ect ect and just rebuild the rear end myself. All you will need beside hand tools is a good dial indicator to set up the backlash and pinion depth. Building a rear end is not really that hard you just have to take your time and make sure you get everything in spec. If you got a good repair manual and follow it you will knock out the job and save yourself alot of money. For some reason people will do every other aspect of thier car by themselfs and are scared to touch the diff.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Jan 29, 2004
#8
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #8
Most early 28 spline axles taper down in the middle. That will be your weak point imo. I'm going 8.8. Lighter, cheaper, more efficient, and plenty of fast cars running them w/o trouble.
 
G

GaPonyFarm

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
663
0
0
Columbus, GA
Jan 29, 2004
#9
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #9
1320stang said:
GaPonyFarm said:
Your 8" stuff won't work... QUOTE]

Not true, if he has a 9" the same width as his 8", and has the smaller housing ends and a 28 spline section in his 9" pumpkin, the 28 spline axles from the 8" and the backing plates and drum brakes will work on a 9". One of my best friends has this exact setup in his '67 coupe.
Click to expand...

Are you expecting the planets to align perfectly, at the exact moment he walks upon a rearend... Remember this is a '66, not a '67 or later. 9" rears for those cars aren't just lying around all over the place like they used to be. I haven't seen a 9" housing that has the same flanges as an 8" housing...sorry.
Click to expand...
 
G

GaPonyFarm

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
663
0
0
Columbus, GA
Jan 29, 2004
#10
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #10
Amen to the 8.8"! ... Probably the most underestimated rearend out there. And there are millions of them around.
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Jan 30, 2004
#11
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #11
GaPonyFarm said:
Are you expecting the planets to align perfectly, at the exact moment he walks upon a rearend... Remember this is a '66, not a '67 or later. 9" rears for those cars aren't just lying around all over the place like they used to be. I haven't seen a 9" housing that has the same flanges as an 8" housing...sorry.
Click to expand...

Huh, I just got a '57 9" rear end for free for my '65 coupe. Complete. Maybe you need to get out more often. Sorry, I'm being a smartazz.

I wasn't saying he'll find the correct housing, but many passenger car rears have the small bearing ends on them which are the exact same as the 8" ends. Having a housing professionally narrowed and the perches placed in the correct position will run somewhere from $125-$200 with you supplying the housing. This is a fact. I have a buddy that has a race car chassis shop, he's done hundreds of rears, this is where I get my info from.
 
G

GaPonyFarm

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
663
0
0
Columbus, GA
Jan 30, 2004
#12
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #12
1320stang said:
Huh, I just got a '57 9" rear end for free for my '65 coupe. Complete. Maybe you need to get out more often. Sorry, I'm being a smartazz.

I wasn't saying he'll find the correct housing, but many passenger car rears have the small bearing ends on them which are the exact same as the 8" ends. Having a housing professionally narrowed and the perches placed in the correct position will run somewhere from $125-$200 with you supplying the housing. This is a fact. I have a buddy that has a race car chassis shop, he's done hundreds of rears, this is where I get my info from.
Click to expand...

Remember, nobody likes a smartazz...


'57 huh... not the best of breed, but ok for low power use. You really want the newer housing... but its certainly worth what you paid.

My guess is, if he had a buddy with a shop, he wouldn't be asking these questions. I suppose if you cut enough and weld enough, you can make anything. I have several 8" & 9" rears and none of the 8" races will fit the 9" tubes... However my main point was to question why he even needed the 9". A 9" rear with 28 spline axles is not much stronger than an 8". The axles are the weak link, not the gears, especially if he's using those cheap tapered axles.

Get your buddy to weld a girdle support on your '57 housing... you'll be glad you had it done.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Jan 30, 2004
#13
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #13
The bottom line recommendation is that you have your ring and pinion gears set up by a pro or at least someone with micrometers that has done MANY of them. The mesh and lash settings are very important. Too tight and they'll rob lots of power and grind themselves to death. Too loose and they'll break. The tolerances are VERY small, we're talking THOUSANTHS of an inch here, and you can't use plastigauge like you can on your crank.
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Jan 30, 2004
#14
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #14
GaPonyFarm said:
Remember, nobody likes a smartazz...


'57 huh... not the best of breed, but ok for low power use. You really want the newer housing... but its certainly worth what you paid.

My guess is, if he had a buddy with a shop, he wouldn't be asking these questions. I suppose if you cut enough and weld enough, you can make anything. I have several 8" & 9" rears and none of the 8" races will fit the 9" tubes... However my main point was to question why he even needed the 9". A 9" rear with 28 spline axles is not much stronger than an 8". The axles are the weak link, not the gears, especially if he's using those cheap tapered axles.

Get your buddy to weld a girdle support on your '57 housing... you'll be glad you had it done.
Click to expand...

I got it cause it was a bolt in and I doubt I'll ever make more than 400 HP or 400 ft/lb of tourque in it. Not going to be a race car, just a warmed over driver. Now my '63 Nostalgia Super Stock Fairlane will need a braced rear end. I've already got a big web pickup 9" housing ready for narrowing for it. Ladder bars and coil overs with a minitub for that car. Should end up with 700 HP FE between the notched shock towers. Crites fiberglass with me cutting as much weight as I can and a 'moly cage should get the weight down into the 2700 lb range dry.

But I digress. I agree, in my scenario, you end up with a rear that's not any stronger than the 8" it's replacing, but it will ultimately have more potential. It'll just cost more in the long run than doing it right the first time. But he was wanting a 9" as cheap as he could get it, and this is the cheapest solution I can think of, unless he runs across a deal like I did. My buddy is running a '57 9" in his '68 coupe with my 500hp 289 in it running high 11's with a C4 and 4.88 gears in a mini spool (or did he get a full spool?) on real street radials. It held up for a few passes with old slicks okay, but I bet the motor will puke before the rear, it has close to 200 passes on the Howards aluminum rods with heavy TRW 12.7:1 slugs on the ends. Cast 289 crank, but it revs to 8 grand okay with no girdle. Went 11.08@119 in a 3000# Mach I with a 2.95 (I believe) Jerico and 5.67 gears on 2 year old 9x30 slicks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Progress Thread Today in the shed........
  • Don7Up
  • May 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
810
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Yesterday at 2:20 PM
Don7Up
D
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
521
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
Progress Thread 351w Build, 67 Coupe
  • redstang67
  • Oct 4, 2024
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
339
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Oct 5, 2024
89ripper
B
Purchasing 1st Fox, need advice
  • Blown02svt
  • May 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2025
manicmechanic007
S
65 Coupe I6 Auto to 302 EFI 5 Speed Swap
  • Scuderia
  • Feb 3, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?