• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Advice please on this midpipe

  • Thread starter Thread starter mjh78
  • Start date Start date Jan 5, 2008
M

mjh78

Member
Oct 12, 2007
22
0
7
Jan 5, 2008
#1
  • Jan 5, 2008
  • #1
I currently have a MAC SS catback and am very pleased with it. I'm considering the MAC O/R prochamber. Wanted to stay away from the raspy sound that the X pipes supposedly produce. Would this be a good combo? Also..with my catback I didn't necessarily see or expect any much in the SOTP power gains, but with the midpipe and getting rid of the cats..could I realistically expect more of an impact in HP with the midpipe than I did with the catback?
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Jan 6, 2008
#2
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #2
mjh78 said:
I currently have a MAC SS catback and am very pleased with it. I'm considering the MAC O/R prochamber. Wanted to stay away from the raspy sound that the X pipes supposedly produce. Would this be a good combo? Also..with my catback I didn't necessarily see or expect any much in the SOTP power gains, but with the midpipe and getting rid of the cats..could I realistically expect more of an impact in HP with the midpipe than I did with the catback?
Click to expand...

Prochamber should sound nice and aggressive. You'll get decent gains with that it, better than the catback alone.
 

georgio440

Member
Nov 22, 2007
195
0
17
Walnut Creek, CA
Jan 6, 2008
#3
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #3
Hmm... Can't say that my Pypes O/R X sounds raspy it all. It sounds pretty beastly, to be honest.

Fobra, did you put yours on yet?
 

deftsound

Please ask me how much my supercharger cost
Apr 6, 2004
945
1
39
Texas City TX
Jan 6, 2008
#4
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #4
should sound awesome
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,389
3,536
233
Jan 6, 2008
#5
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #5
It will sound killer and have a deep mellow tone at idle. You should feel a bit of gain on the top end, it will sound faster anyway
 
M

mjh78

Member
Oct 12, 2007
22
0
7
Jan 6, 2008
#6
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #6
thanks guys. What's the verdict on the MIL's? seems Steedas have a good rep, but i read a lot of guys say theirs don't work. Are the front two O2 sensors on the stock "headers" or does the prochamber have hookups for these? the rear two I guess I'll hook up some MIL's and I guess coat with some grease before joining (rust prevent.) and tie them up and hope they work. I am correct in that removing the cats will have ZERO effect on engine function, correct? stricly emissions is all, right? thanks again
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Jan 6, 2008
#7
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #7
georgio440 said:
Hmm... Can't say that my Pypes O/R X sounds raspy it all. It sounds pretty beastly, to be honest.

Fobra, did you put yours on yet?
Click to expand...

It's going on tomorrow, big delay because of the crappy thunderstorm The Steeda pulleys I got are also going in as well Get the clip fixed yet?
 

Twista

Active Member
May 7, 2004
510
2
29
@ the z00 in chicago
Jan 6, 2008
#8
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #8
1ST MUSTANG HAS

mac catback and mac o/r prochamber- fast forward to 1:09 and youll hear what ur car will sound like http://youtube.com/watch?v=MR9lyybxuO8
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Jan 6, 2008
#9
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #9
mjh78 said:
thanks guys. What's the verdict on the MIL's? seems Steedas have a good rep, but i read a lot of guys say theirs don't work. Are the front two O2 sensors on the stock "headers" or does the prochamber have hookups for these? the rear two I guess I'll hook up some MIL's and I guess coat with some grease before joining (rust prevent.) and tie them up and hope they work. I am correct in that removing the cats will have ZERO effect on engine function, correct? stricly emissions is all, right? thanks again
Click to expand...

Get a tuner instead if you have the money and going that route. As far as mils go, steeda is a trust worthy brand as they work with ford on mustangs. The prochamber should have no effect on the engine.

Btw, what year is your mustang, I believe the 07+ don't work with the mils so your only option is a tuner or live with the annoying CEL on all the time, but that's not a good idea.
 

propellerhead

New Member
Apr 13, 2004
1,541
0
0
"but what's with the but shots?"
Jan 7, 2008
#10
  • Jan 7, 2008
  • #10
I have the combo you're looking at. I get compliments from non-Mustang folks and non-car enthusiasts too. Deep rumble is sort of universal to old school muscle cars. The raspy rat-tat-tat of X pipes are annoying to some people.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
254
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Long Tubes Worth it for my build?
  • ACSPONY
  • Nov 8, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 11, 2021
RekeHavoc
P
Thoughts on this odd (smog legal) combo?
  • PJV9126
  • Feb 8, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 16, 2023
91AOD5.0LX
New combo
  • 87slow.0
  • Oct 19, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2022
87slow.0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?