• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

afr 165's on stock motor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter slayerripkdc
  • Start date Start date Oct 1, 2006

slayerripkdc

15 Year Member
Jun 3, 2003
1,341
16
59
brewster ny
Oct 1, 2006
#1
  • Oct 1, 2006
  • #1
I was reading in muscle mustags and fast fords that afr put on a set of afr 165's on a bone stock 95 mustang and gained 8 tenths and 5 mph i the 1/4........so i was wondering if any of you guys have any expieince with just swapping out the cylinder heads and gainig alot more power with everything else stock????? 8 tenths for 1300.00$ isnt all that bad.
 

AznStanger3v

Active Member
Aug 11, 2003
2,026
0
47
Northern VA
Oct 1, 2006
#2
  • Oct 1, 2006
  • #2
shoot, if i could go back in time, that wouldve been my FIRST mod ever. even before a cai and catback. 8 tenths sounds like a lot, but hey, if it is proven, then you cant argue with proof
 

slayerripkdc

15 Year Member
Jun 3, 2003
1,341
16
59
brewster ny
Oct 1, 2006
#3
  • Oct 1, 2006
  • #3
i am thiking of getting the afr's but i am wondering if any one ever ran such a good flowing head with stock everthing else?????since it will have such free flowing heads and everythig else will be such a bottle neck i am wondering if it will lose most of its low end torque but have **** loads of high rpm horses??? If that is the case then my 4.10s and the afrs will be a good combo i guess???? any one chime in.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 1, 2006
#4
  • Oct 1, 2006
  • #4
I would have a long term plan for the Stang.

When doing the heads I would also do the cam that fits into those goals at that same time.

You then would have the most involved part of the combo build done and then do all the other little stuff as time/money allows.

I have always thought heads & cam first is a great way to start out.

Grady
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Oct 1, 2006
#5
  • Oct 1, 2006
  • #5
I did just the heads with stock intake and cam. Ford advertises the GT40 Y303s as a 40hp over stock and they weren't lying. With just the heads with the stock stamped steal rockers I went .4sec quicker in the 1/4mile. Figuring every tenth is about 10hp the heads hit the mark perfectly. I even had the stock 4 catted H-pipe at the time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

"Tuning" Vortech kit with FMU discs- question
  • nicholase
  • Jun 22, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 13, 2025
Noobz347
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
588
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
731
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
900
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?