• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

AFR or FTI users - Performer or Performer RPM for FTI combo?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 5spd GT
  • Start date Start date May 23, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 23, 2004
#1
  • May 23, 2004
  • #1
I only bought the AFR 165 heads, FTI cam, lifters, roller rockers from Ed...

This is 100% daily driven...and the car should trap around 110mph maybe a tad less...

The Performer is idle to 5500 rpm and the Performer RPM is 1500-6500...

Thanks guys
 

TIMMY2734

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
1,330
1
36
Queens, NY
May 23, 2004
#2
  • May 23, 2004
  • #2
Seeing as how Ed designed the cam for YOUR combo, id ask him..
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
May 23, 2004
#3
  • May 23, 2004
  • #3
RPM
 
8

87AODGT

Founding Member
Jan 6, 2001
373
1
19
Toms River, NJ
May 23, 2004
#4
  • May 23, 2004
  • #4
RPM II, got no complaints here
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 23, 2004
#5
  • May 23, 2004
  • #5
Yes Ed designed it for MY combo but I'm wanting other suggestions also...people that have these particular intakes with AFR's or FTI parts...

Would the RPM be a little lacking down low...because that is one thing I don't want to lose is good ole 5.0 torque at idle and low rpm situations...

Thanks...

David
 
D

davs5.0

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
921
0
0
windsor,ontario,canada
May 23, 2004
#6
  • May 23, 2004
  • #6
I would say the RPM. I'm building a 331 with AFR 185's and all the goodies. The low end torque loss you might see versus the regular Edelbrock would be very little at best and affects aod cars alot more than stick.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
May 24, 2004
#7
  • May 24, 2004
  • #7
TIMMY2734 said:
Seeing as how Ed designed the cam for YOUR combo, id ask him..
Click to expand...


I agree 100%, Ed takes into effect the intake volume, headers, etc.. when doing a custom cam it may or may not effect your peak rpm.
 

TIMMY2734

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
1,330
1
36
Queens, NY
May 24, 2004
#8
  • May 24, 2004
  • #8
Without knowing the cam specs, i dont see how you can determine what intake to buy.. What good is it having a cam that only pulls to 5500, but an intake that goes till 6500 and vice-versa of course.

Ill stick by my original answer, talk with Ed
 

86Cobra

Founding Member
Jun 6, 2000
2,064
1
0
Phoenix, AZ
May 24, 2004
#9
  • May 24, 2004
  • #9
I agree with TIMMAH.
 

SCORPION

New Member
Mar 2, 2004
386
0
0
Seaford, DE
May 24, 2004
#10
  • May 24, 2004
  • #10
AFR recommends Edlebrock Performer RPM intake
 
R

RIXX93GT

Founding Member
Oct 10, 2002
166
0
0
Dayton, Ohio
May 24, 2004
#11
  • May 24, 2004
  • #11
What he said ...talk to ED.... but hey I talked to Ed and ended up with a typhoon...rpm clone. Happy so far. Thing pulls like a raped ape all the way up to the limiter.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 24, 2004
#12
  • May 24, 2004
  • #12
I already emailed Ed (waiting on response)...like I said I want other suggestions and opinions of the intakes with either FTI or AFR products...

Keep em' coming...
 

TIMMY2734

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
1,330
1
36
Queens, NY
May 24, 2004
#13
  • May 24, 2004
  • #13
There are many many FTI and AFR combos.. For starters, you should be looking asking for someone with a combo similar to yours, not the guy running 205's and a 620" solid roller. Without giving the specs on your cam, your just taking a guess at what you should get. That extra hundred bucks that you spent on the custom is for his expertise and designing the cam around specific components. I would just wait for his reply or pick up the phone.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 24, 2004
#14
  • May 24, 2004
  • #14
TIMMY2734 said:
There are many many FTI and AFR combos.. For starters, you should be looking asking for someone with a combo similar to yours, not the guy running 205's and a 620" solid roller. Without giving the specs on your cam, your just taking a guess at what you should get. That extra hundred bucks that you spent on the custom is for his expertise and designing the cam around specific components. I would just wait for his reply or pick up the phone.
Click to expand...

I thought it was pretty self explanatory when I put on my first post that I have "AFR 165 heads, FTI cam, lifters, roller rockers from Ed..."...it would take common sense to think well a certain intake isn't going to work with 205cc heads etc...

I'm waiting...wanting to know what other people are running and how it seems to run...my cam is very similar to these other AFR 165 combo's on here...
 

TIMMY2734

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
1,330
1
36
Queens, NY
May 24, 2004
#15
  • May 24, 2004
  • #15
At least give the cam specs if you want a decent answer.
Thats all im trying to say.

Someone like Mike Yount or someone else that knows cams can give you a better halping hand and tell you which would be better.
 

Merrickd

Founding Member
Nov 14, 2000
98
2
18
Madison/Janesville,WI
May 24, 2004
#16
  • May 24, 2004
  • #16
He wont know the specs until he buys the cam. You cant very have a custom cam ground if you dont have the parts. Its a bit of a catch-22. I just got my FTI-Edelbrock RPM combo together. I can provide you with my experiences. I still need to dyno it and tune it with an air/fuel meter. So without the aide of a professional dyno tune I have driven it 1000 miles. I dont have much bottom end under 3000k maybe can get soem back with some dyno time. I am not really too upset about it. It keeps me out of getting tickets. I drove it from central WI to St. Louis for the World Ford Challenge. So far it has been trouble free. I ordered the valve spring upgrade kit from Ed as well. Your best bet with your particular setup is to talk to Ed. I can tellyou about my car all day long but its stil my car and it will be different. You have a tight ass ride, mine is a 91 calypso hatch.
 

TIMMY2734

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
1,330
1
36
Queens, NY
May 24, 2004
#17
  • May 24, 2004
  • #17
he said he bought the cam already
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 24, 2004
#18
  • May 24, 2004
  • #18
TIMMY2734 said:
he said he bought the cam already
Click to expand...

Yes but they haven't been shipped yet

Calypso huh?...I like that color...mine is Reef Blue...I think those are some of my two favorite colors...plus a nice clean black one
 
M

meangreen92lx

Member
May 24, 2004
52
0
6
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
May 24, 2004
#19
  • May 24, 2004
  • #19
Hey all. I just finished my FTI-AFR 165 engine build a little over a month ago. My car is a 1992 LX Hatchback with a 5 speed. ED told me to run a regular Performer intake on my car. I thought that was odd but thats what he said. I think it has something to do with intake velocity that matches the cam and AFR heads. The tests I've seen in the past only show the RPM intake better way at the top which is ok for a drag car, but for the street, the performer is better all around. My cam from ED is bigger than most I see posted and he still recommended the performer. The way I see it, I can always upgrade to the rpm upper later if I want seeing the lowers are the same. My car pulls to the limiter with no problem. Please tell us what he e-mails you back, I'd be interested to know. I too drove down to the WFC 7 in St. louis. Stayed at the fairfield inn in Collinsville. was a good time except the police locking the whole town down. No fun.....
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 24, 2004
#20
  • May 24, 2004
  • #20
meangreen92lx said:
Hey all. I just finished my FTI-AFR 165 engine build a little over a month ago. My car is a 1992 LX Hatchback with a 5 speed. ED told me to run a regular Performer intake on my car. I thought that was odd but thats what he said. I think it has something to do with intake velocity that matches the cam and AFR heads. The tests I've seen in the past only show the RPM intake better way at the top which is ok for a drag car, but for the street, the performer is better all around. My cam from ED is bigger than most I see posted and he still recommended the performer. The way I see it, I can always upgrade to the rpm upper later if I want seeing the lowers are the same. My car pulls to the limiter with no problem. Please tell us what he e-mails you back, I'd be interested to know. I too drove down to the WFC 7 in St. louis. Stayed at the fairfield inn in Collinsville. was a good time except the police locking the whole town down. No fun.....
Click to expand...

Thanks man... ...thats the stuff I like to see...did you degree the cam in?

Just curious...

David
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
726
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
903
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread H/C Swap Problems/Ideas
  • sav22rem22
  • Mar 31, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 10, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?