• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

AFR vs. Trickflow cylinder heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1991vert
  • Start date Start date Dec 26, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 2 of 6 Next Last

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Dec 26, 2004
#21
  • Dec 26, 2004
  • #21
Its on the AFR web site.Go to the page that says "Articles", its on the bottom.
 
M

manpowermustang

Member
Sep 25, 2004
228
0
16
Milwaukee, Wi
Dec 26, 2004
#22
  • Dec 26, 2004
  • #22
Grn92LX

I think it was a 331 or 347 also. Ill look in the pile. I book mark all of my mags for references in cases like this.
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Dec 26, 2004
#23
  • Dec 26, 2004
  • #23
It was a 331 with a .040 over bore (333).
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Dec 26, 2004
#24
  • Dec 26, 2004
  • #24
lol oops i meant afr 205's my bad
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 26, 2004
#25
  • Dec 26, 2004
  • #25
Thanks guys, I just looked at the article. Wow, the TW heads hung right with the 185's. The 185's made 10 more average hp/tq on the 333.
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Dec 26, 2004
#26
  • Dec 26, 2004
  • #26
Grn92LX said:
Is there anyway you can scan the dyno results and post the combo they used in that test? I believe it was a 331 or a 347? I been looking for that issue and I can't find it in my room. sleeperstang9211@hotmail.com

Mike
Click to expand...

Yea, I know how yea feel.I had like 100 misc. mags and my father made me get rid of them because they were starting to clutter up the shop floor and stuff, lol.
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Dec 26, 2004
#27
  • Dec 26, 2004
  • #27
Grn92LX said:
Thanks guys, I just looked at the article. Wow, the TW heads hung right with the 185's. The 185's made 10 more average hp/tq on the 333.
Click to expand...

I got a feeling that the TFS heads would have equiled or even beat the AFR 185cc if it was on a standarded bore motor, because of the semi-cant on the intake valve on the TFS.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 26, 2004
#28
  • Dec 26, 2004
  • #28
bluevenom867 said:
I got a feeling that the TFS heads would have equiled or even beat the AFR 185cc if it was on a standarded bore motor, because of the semi-cant on the intake valve on the TFS.
Click to expand...


I don't see how the overbore makes a difference when comparing the 2 heads. On that combo the 185's are clearly the winner. Either way, i'm partial to the trickflow stuff and I wouldnt ever put anything afr on any of my engines. Just how I feel
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Dec 26, 2004
#29
  • Dec 26, 2004
  • #29
The larger the bore, the less the valves are shrouded.The TFS heads have the intake valve angle in which will unshroud the valve more even with a smaller bore.
 

1991vert

10 Year Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,103
7
69
Ludlow, MA
Dec 27, 2004
#30
  • Dec 27, 2004
  • #30
i was looking at longtubes, but i lowered the car so i'd probably scrape everywhere. it would look like i had sparklers underneath my car
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Dec 27, 2004
#31
  • Dec 27, 2004
  • #31
Na, sould be fine.Long tubes are best for making power.My car was lower to, it only scraped when we went over speed bumps whit a passenger that was over 200lbs.
 

1991vert

10 Year Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,103
7
69
Ludlow, MA
Dec 27, 2004
#32
  • Dec 27, 2004
  • #32
i scrape goign into my garage with an offroad Xpipe
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Dec 27, 2004
#33
  • Dec 27, 2004
  • #33
Whoa! Really?
I had a BBK O/R H-Pipe and like I said only with two people in the car and going over bumps.Maybe you got your car lowerd more than 2" or something.
 

tonydalrymple

Active Member
Nov 27, 2004
167
29
39
Salt Lake City, Utah
Dec 27, 2004
#34
  • Dec 27, 2004
  • #34
1) My off road x-pipe scrapes pretty easily without passengers on big speed bumps. No crushing yet; just scraping.
2) See my sig... 310rwhp on dyno three weeks ago(dynojet).
3) Either head will do equally well powerwise as others have so kindly stated.
4) AFR165's=no piston to valve interference; Twisted wedges= better clay it to be sure....
 

Slow5.0

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
2,554
0
46
Portland, OR
Dec 27, 2004
#35
  • Dec 27, 2004
  • #35
tonydalrymple said:
1) My off road x-pipe scrapes pretty easily without passengers on big speed bumps. No crushing yet; just scraping.
2) See my sig... 310rwhp on dyno three weeks ago(dynojet).
3) Either head will do equally well powerwise as others have so kindly stated.
4) AFR165's=no piston to valve interference; Twisted wedges= better clay it to be sure....
Click to expand...

First of all i'm born in Bosnia / Europe now live in USA and my english sux so don't critize me

TW heads with no more than .500 lift cam will clear piston to valve interference
I have TW with B-31 AFM cam (blower cam) with .544 i had to flycut pistons ,but hey its .544 lift thats like Trick flow stage 4 cam
AND i have 3900lbs Stang GT vert and i run 12.9@108 with just 1.8 60ft
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 27, 2004
#36
  • Dec 27, 2004
  • #36
No, peak lift has NOTHING to do with it! You can run a LOT LARGER cam than a .500" with TW heads on stock pistons. My cam now is a lot more than .500", clears just fine and my heads are milled .020".

Fwiw, my longtubes do not scrape. The H pipe clamp is what scrapes on certain driveways due to the way I clamped it when I installed it. And im way too lazy to crawl under the car and move it.
 

Slow5.0

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
2,554
0
46
Portland, OR
Dec 27, 2004
#37
  • Dec 27, 2004
  • #37
Grn92LX i forget to say i have .040" milled my heads so thats not true TW with mid cam will have problem with piston to valve
 

Slow5.0

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
2,554
0
46
Portland, OR
Dec 27, 2004
#38
  • Dec 27, 2004
  • #38
Double post
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 27, 2004
#39
  • Dec 27, 2004
  • #39
No, its ALL in the valve timing whether or not you'll have p to v issues. Peak lift means nothing as far as p to v goes. Thats what I meant.
 
9

90Notch

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,046
0
0
Westwood, MA & yes it's killing me that I'm no
Dec 27, 2004
#40
  • Dec 27, 2004
  • #40
Wow, the TW heads hung right with the 185's.
Click to expand...

TWs have shorter runners than most others so the runners, if they were same length as say a AFR than the vol would be closer to 180cc +.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 2 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Resolved 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
664
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Friday at 12:37 PM
fasterthangas
F
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
785
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
J
68 Mustang with Foxbody Engine Stalling Issues - MSPNP2
  • JayV68Stang
  • Mar 13, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
3
Views
434
Digital Self-tuning Forum Mar 13, 2025
JayV68Stang
J
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Thursday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?