• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Aftermarket heads on my 289

  • Thread starter Thread starter Crs
  • Start date Start date Jan 28, 2007

Crs

Member
May 7, 2004
182
0
16
San Francisco, CA
Jan 28, 2007
#1
  • Jan 28, 2007
  • #1
I'm rebuilding my original 289 on my 68. My question is it worth the cost buying aftermarket heads since my originals will need hardened seats, and other parts as well and still wont breath as good as aftermarket? I would like to get 280 to 300hp and have a fun driving reliable ride with an rv type cam, 9.0 -9.5 to 1 comp, 4 barrel intake and carb. Oh, and also a C4 with 3.50 gears. Thanks Guys!
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jan 28, 2007
#2
  • Jan 28, 2007
  • #2
Crs said:
I'm rebuilding my original 289 on my 68. My question is it worth the cost buying aftermarket heads since my originals will need hardened seats, and other parts as well and still wont breath as good as aftermarket?
Click to expand...

Aside from the cost of rebuilding the originals, you'll need to factor in the portwork necessary for 280+rwhp. The aftermarkets will start looking better after it all adds up.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 29, 2007
#3
  • Jan 29, 2007
  • #3
Unless he's going to drive it everyday, he really doesn't need hardened seats. Just a good valve job and open the exhaust sides up will get him what he wants. If he does shop for heads, he needs to stick with 58 cc chambered heads only.
 

Crs

Member
May 7, 2004
182
0
16
San Francisco, CA
Jan 29, 2007
#4
  • Jan 29, 2007
  • #4
If i do decide on aftermarket, any recommendations on a better than stock head out of the box.
 

Crs

Member
May 7, 2004
182
0
16
San Francisco, CA
Jan 29, 2007
#5
  • Jan 29, 2007
  • #5
Sorry forgot to add........................Will the price of a valve job+ the opening of the exhaust side of the stock heads equal almost to the price of new aftermarket heads? The engine has 145,000 miles.
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Jan 29, 2007
#6
  • Jan 29, 2007
  • #6
I suggest you get a valve job done and port them yourself....its not that difficult to clean up the chambers and open up the ports a little with a grinder and a little patience. Do a search for DIY porting and you'll get some info.

It wont be a professional port job, but:

1. it will def help
2. it will cost next to 0
3. its fun to learn
4. you can tell your friends "nah, I ported em myself, man."

Otherwise, for olt-on, out of the box I would suggest Edelbrocks.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 29, 2007
#7
  • Jan 29, 2007
  • #7
LMan said:
I suggest you get a valve job done and port them yourself....its not that difficult to clean up the chambers and open up the ports a little with a grinder and a little patience. Do a search for DIY porting and you'll get some info.

It wont be a professional port job, but:

1. it will def help
2. it will cost next to 0
3. its fun to learn
4. you can tell your friends "nah, I ported em myself, man."
Click to expand...
 
O

ohyaa

Member
May 27, 2004
42
0
6
Henderson, NV
Jan 29, 2007
#8
  • Jan 29, 2007
  • #8
I went with the Edelbrock Performer heads. Disadvantage was the extra cost over rebuild the stockers. Advantages are all new parts, hardened seats, better flow and less weight.
 

Crs

Member
May 7, 2004
182
0
16
San Francisco, CA
Jan 29, 2007
#9
  • Jan 29, 2007
  • #9
Ohyaa, How do you like your engine combo?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 30, 2007
#10
  • Jan 30, 2007
  • #10
if you are on a budget, the world products windsor jr heads are perfect for your 289. they are less expensive than the edelbrock heads, and flow just was well.
 
J

jintfan53

New Member
Nov 10, 2004
11
0
0
Jan 31, 2007
#11
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #11
I have a mild 289 (1968) as well and was wondering of these heads would drastically reduce compression and hurt performance. Just got a classic over summer and this is my first question on stangnet. Any help would be much appreciated thanks guys
 
O

ohyaa

Member
May 27, 2004
42
0
6
Henderson, NV
Jan 31, 2007
#12
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #12
Crs said:
Ohyaa, How do you like your engine combo?
Click to expand...

So far I have not been able to really drive the car. The initial cam break in was done and did some of the fine tuning. It idles nicely now at about 750 rpm and sounds great through the Flowmaster 50's. Hopefully next weekend its ready for some break in miles.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 31, 2007
#13
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #13
jintfan53 said:
I have a mild 289 (1968) as well and was wondering of these heads would drastically reduce compression and hurt performance. Just got a classic over summer and this is my first question on stangnet. Any help would be much appreciated thanks guys
Click to expand...

there might be a slight compression loss due to the extra 4cc combustion chamber size, but the improved flow through the ports, and the improved combustion chamber design negate any performance loss that there might be from any compression loss. in fact you will get a decent performance increase. these heads are a 40hp bolt on.
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Jan 31, 2007
#14
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #14
You say the engine has 145k on it now? Sounds like it could be nearing the end of its life. Then again, if theres no knocking and no burning oil or leaks, it may be just fine. I would check the timing chain when you tear it apart. They can get pretty stretched with that kind of mileage and dont give any warning before slipping a tooth, or breaking altogether. As for cylinder heads, how about a set of gt-40s? They already have hardened seats and can be found for around $400 a set new. Im not sure if the spark plugs in the "P" heads will clear the exhaust setup that you have (Im assuming stock manifolds), but the 96 and possibly 97 heads have the standard old spark plug location. Bolt on a set of FRPP cobra roller rockers and youll have yourself a nice combo on the cheap that will easily support 350 hp in stock form.
 

Crs

Member
May 7, 2004
182
0
16
San Francisco, CA
Feb 1, 2007
#15
  • Feb 1, 2007
  • #15
Can i find a set of gt-40's on ebay for $400?
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Feb 1, 2007
#16
  • Feb 1, 2007
  • #16
Crs said:
Can i find a set of gt-40's on ebay for $400?
Click to expand...

Probly not on ebay, but you can at your local parts store. Tell them you need new heads for a 96 Explorer v8. Youll need a VIN, so go on ebay and get one. Then turn in the crappiest 302 heads you can find so you can save your original 289 heads if you want.
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Feb 2, 2007
#17
  • Feb 2, 2007
  • #17
Last time I checked NAPA wanted $600 for rebuilt stock heads!!!!! So yes, aftermarket should be considered since your heads likley need guides, valve seats, springs,etc....
 

dbfarr

Member
Sep 17, 2005
191
0
17
Boise ID
Feb 2, 2007
#18
  • Feb 2, 2007
  • #18
Decurion said:
Probly not on ebay, but you can at your local parts store. Tell them you need new heads for a 96 Explorer v8.
Click to expand...

I realize this context is a bit of a highjack (damn A.D.D.), so I'll repost this on a new thread...

gt-40p heads.... spark plug angles for headers= At least as far as I have heard.

This gives me an opportunity, what about these Procomp deals floating around

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/FORD...270084903825QQihZ017QQitemZ270084903825QQrdZ1

Not that I contend they match up with say, Edelbrock, AFR, RHS, or any of the other big names. Still, if you're looking at reworking stock heads, can these be, economically and functionally, a better alternative?

I mean, for 750$, after springs etc., how bad of a deal is it. Especially since a friend of mine had his heads redone, broke several guideplates, bought several sets of springs, took them back and needed more work, he is way over 750$ (the valve spring reliefs were not deep enough). He talks about these Procomps all the time. Usually while spitting.

See here:

http://www.mercurycougar.net/forums/showthread.php?t=21240

and here:

http://www.mercurycougar.net/forums/showthread.php?t=23744

and here:

http://www.mercurycougar.net/forums/showthread.php?t=25925

and finally (hopefully) here:

http://www.mercurycougar.net/forums/showthread.php?t=26994

All because the machine shop failed to do it right the first time.

I am not trying to scare anyone (although I'm frightened, myself), i just wonder if a trip to the machine shop on these old heads is even worth the trouble anymore.

Let's face it, not every machinist is a genius or even easy to work with. Getting an old set of heads reworked can be costly, emotionally and fiscally. Why not just bolt a set of these Procomp deals on for a budget build?
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
First post 289 rebuild question!
  • Ddyer2868
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
269
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
900
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Help me figure out this 5.0 HO I pulled out of the P.N.P.
  • Cool Beans
  • Feb 10, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 15, 2019
Cool Beans
C
98 V6 -> 289 engine swap
  • Cerdman
  • Dec 4, 2018
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
3K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 10, 2018
Cerdman
C
JCBeaver's 1993 GT Coyote Swap "The Never-Ending Project"
  • JCBeaver
  • Aug 13, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 8 9 10
Replies
182
Views
33K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2020
JCBeaver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?