• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

All headers seem to suck

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aftrbrnr
  • Start date Start date May 19, 2007

Aftrbrnr

Whitey cashier gave me the wrong change at the sup
Founding Member
Feb 19, 2000
1,183
15
89
Canaduh
May 19, 2007
#1
  • May 19, 2007
  • #1
I notice when people talk about headers, they tend to focus on the downsides. Here's what I've heard about the types:

Unequal-length shorties: Sometimes they don't even make a difference. I've heard stories of guys installing them and not getting any gains at all.

Equal-length shorties: A bit difficult install, some loss of torque on mostly stock engines.

Long-Tubes: Even when application type is 100% correct (i.e. LT built for Fox-body AOD car) fitment seems to always be a problem and they never seem to fit. Only for cars that have a fairly modified engine.

I'm considering the unequal-lengths for now, but the hearing stories of no gains make me kind of wary.
 

12Pack

Member
Jun 3, 2005
46
1
8
CT
May 19, 2007
#2
  • May 19, 2007
  • #2
Every1 has a diff opinion and i liked my LT's on my GT
 
S

slappy9090

New Member
Apr 20, 2007
40
0
0
marion, iowa
May 19, 2007
#3
  • May 19, 2007
  • #3
I love my bbk long tubes, I had bbk shorties also on my old car liked those, but the long tubes sound throatier, car flies!
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
May 19, 2007
#4
  • May 19, 2007
  • #4
I've had the same set of BBK L/Ts for several years, the only thing I hated about them is installing the header bolts so I bought some ARP stainless header studs
 

jtfairlane

New Member
Mar 5, 2006
468
3
0
May 19, 2007
#5
  • May 19, 2007
  • #5
Aftrbrnr said:
I notice when people talk about headers, they tend to focus on the downsides. Here's what I've heard about the types:

Unequal-length shorties: Sometimes they don't even make a difference. I've heard stories of guys installing them and not getting any gains at all.

Equal-length shorties: A bit difficult install, some loss of torque on mostly stock engines.

Long-Tubes: Even when application type is 100% correct (i.e. LT built for Fox-body AOD car) fitment seems to always be a problem and they never seem to fit. Only for cars that have a fairly modified engine.

I'm considering the unequal-lengths for now, but the hearing stories of no gains make me kind of wary.
Click to expand...

The comments you've heard about meager power gains are because guys install these headers on stock motors expecting an increase in power, but don't get one. Well....duh. The motor came from the factory with shorty unequal headers, albeit not great ones, so improving the performance of the headers without improving anything else like heads, intake, etc....will not yield the same gains as if you were choking off nice flowing heads with the stock headers.

The only truly E-A-S-Y to install headers are unequal length shorties. Equal length shorty headers and long tubes will always be more difficult to install, but that is the nature of headers in general.

If you want an easy power gain, but don't want to do anything else, headers are not the way to go. You can accomplish more with a 65mm throttle body or underdrive pullies for less effort.

If you are planning on future horsepower upgrades, than you are going to want better exhaust....including headers.

Just KNOW what you want to do with the car. You want it 95% stock with a couple bolt ons? Or, do you plan on taking the car further. Too many people buy parts without any clear finish in mind, and end up making purchase mistakes they wish they hadn't.

I have equal length shorties on right now, and the passenger side was a nightmare to install, but I'll be thankful to have them on the car when I get a set of new heads on my 5.0 soon.
 

bobbyd

New Member
Sep 8, 2004
312
0
0
San Antonio/Los Angeles
May 19, 2007
#6
  • May 19, 2007
  • #6
jtfairlane said:
The comments you've heard about meager power gains are because guys install these headers on stock motors expecting an increase in power, but don't get one. Well....duh. The motor came from the factory with shorty unequal headers, albeit not great ones, so improving the performance of the headers without improving anything else like heads, intake, etc....will not yield the same gains as if you were choking off nice flowing heads with the stock headers.

The only truly E-A-S-Y to install headers are unequal length shorties. Equal length shorty headers and long tubes will always be more difficult to install, but that is the nature of headers in general.

If you want an easy power gain, but don't want to do anything else, headers are not the way to go. You can accomplish more with a 65mm throttle body or underdrive pullies for less effort.

If you are planning on future horsepower upgrades, than you are going to want better exhaust....including headers.

Just KNOW what you want to do with the car. You want it 95% stock with a couple bolt ons? Or, do you plan on taking the car further. Too many people buy parts without any clear finish in mind, and end up making purchase mistakes they wish they hadn't.

I have equal length shorties on right now, and the passenger side was a nightmare to install, but I'll be thankful to have them on the car when I get a set of new heads on my 5.0 soon.
Click to expand...

same here MACs
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
May 19, 2007
#7
  • May 19, 2007
  • #7
IMO swapping headers on a BONE STOCK engine does nothing as stated above.

and i like to believe that there would actually be a torque loss on stock engines also.
the stock headers are better suited for the stock engine, smaller primaries, lets the exhaust gases achieve better velocity going down the exhaust alot faster, if the exhaust gets out faster, the less the engine has to push it out.

swapping to a bigger diameter primary actually hurts torque, the exhaust gases cannot fill the pipes at low rpm and get that velocity that it could before, it starts to move around and tumble on itself and slowing the flow.

this of it this way. take a small marble, make two long tubes that zig-zag down, make one tube small that hugs up on the marble close. make the other say an inch tube. take 2 marbles, on over each tube, drop them at the same time, which marble would get to the bottom first? the one with the tube hugging it close, the one with the bigger tube would hit and bang around on the sides slowing it down. this is what the air is doing going through the exhaust. get a tube that hugs the exhaust gas tight it cant bang around like the marbles would.

BUT headers may net you a few HP in the top end, when the engine makes more exhaust to effieciently use the extra volume in the headers where the stock headers would normally choke it and become a restriction.

stock exhaust actually is the best way to go on a stock engine, get rid of the cats and get a nice sounding muffler. and run it until you get a cylinder head that flows more and stuff like that.

but if your plan to get that stuff later on i'd just grab the headers now, will make the car a little louder and if you dont notice a gain now so what, at least you wont be choking the engine later on with new upgrades.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
524
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
570
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
647
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?