• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Am I Stupid? Why Do I Keep Thinking About Getting A Fiberglass Bumper

  • Thread starter Thread starter jikelly
  • Start date Start date Feb 22, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Feb 22, 2007
#1
  • Feb 22, 2007
  • #1
I was messing around in the garage today and got a wild hair up my rump. I thought I'd measure the weight of my 73 mustang's front bumper. Umfgh it's a heavy sumomabish.

The thing weighs like 74 something pounds. So, that got me to thinking about an advertisement for a fiberglass replacement front bumper. It claims I could cut 50 something pounds off the nose of my stang. 50 something, right off the front!! That'd really help with the weight distribution.

There was a car show or maybe a magazine article I saw about swapping out the front bumper on some GM muscle car for a fiberglass one. They were talking about how great it was to get rid of all that unnecessary weight.

But, is that weight really unnecessary. I mean having a heavy thick chunk of metal on the front of your car could come in handy in an accident, right?

So, I'm not sure if I should get one or not. I was thinking about getting one so I could swap it out on SCCA autocross weekends but I don't know. What do y'all think?
 

Capt Dan

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
237
0
0
College Station, Texas
Feb 22, 2007
#2
  • Feb 22, 2007
  • #2
Can you just take off the metal one on the race weekends? Do they require that you have 'something' there?

Seems like a difficult proceedure to put it on and take it off all the time. Not to mention risky to your paint.
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Feb 22, 2007
#3
  • Feb 22, 2007
  • #3
Are you sure your bumper weighs that much?

On my 70 I easily held my bumper with 1 hand while bolting it on. I think it's closer to 30 or 40lbs. I would expect the 73 bumper to be similar in weight, but maybe not?
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Feb 22, 2007
#4
  • Feb 22, 2007
  • #4
Yeah, but remember, his car is a '73, they had huge bumpers. I've driven ModelA hot rods with no bumper at all and never had a problem. I guess it's because I've ridden street bikes for years, but I'm usually pretty careful, regardless of how stout a bumper I have. I also live in a less-populated area, if I lived in LA, I'd need a bumper and a gun. I say go for it, the bumper on my '68 isn't worth much in a crash anyway.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Feb 22, 2007
#5
  • Feb 22, 2007
  • #5
BottleFed70 said:
Are you sure your bumper weighs that much?

On my 70 I easily held my bumper with 1 hand while bolting it on. I think it's closer to 30 or 40lbs. I would expect the 73 bumper to be similar in weight, but maybe not?
Click to expand...


can you say federally mandated 5 mph impact protection bumper? i can, H-E-A-V-Y!!!!!!, the front bumper on my buddies old 72 caprice weighed about 125 lbs, the back only weighed about 35-40
 

jspagna1

Member
Jan 23, 2007
53
0
6
Connecticut
Feb 22, 2007
#6
  • Feb 22, 2007
  • #6
I hear you. My sister had a '73 and I got into an accident with it. Hit the side of a truck & car bounced right off it. Seriously though, depending if your car is a daily driver then keep the bumper you have. If it's a week-end-warrior then go fiberglass. I did fiberglass front & rear on mine. I never saw them advertised for the the '71-'73 cars? I got mine from Unlimited Products. Their prices are very competitive. You can also try Mustangs Plus or Maier Racing.
 

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Feb 22, 2007
#7
  • Feb 22, 2007
  • #7
The rear bumper on my stang might be 25lbs. Real bad damage if I got hit in the rear. Do you think I could put somekinda reinforcement into the fiberglass bumper? Like some 2" steel tubing or something, or would that defeat the weight savings?

Yeah, my car will be my daily driver, and yeah there are still a lot of people driving and talking on the cell phones. I really don't understand why the phone makes them swerve so much.
 

jspagna1

Member
Jan 23, 2007
53
0
6
Connecticut
Feb 23, 2007
#8
  • Feb 23, 2007
  • #8
Ya, I hear you. It's against the law now in CT but people(females) are always on the cell phones. Scares the crap out of me.

Stick with the bumpers you have. The rear bumper on a '73 is actually perdy beefie,there's just not a lot of it. It is what it is. Just keep your eyes on your rear view mirror.
 
G

Gud T.B. Blown

Member
Dec 9, 2004
583
1
18
Feb 23, 2007
#9
  • Feb 23, 2007
  • #9
jspagna1 said:
Ya, I hear you. It's against the law now in CT but people(females) are always on the cell phones. Scares the crap out of me.

Stick with the bumpers you have. The rear bumper on a '73 is actually perdy beefie,there's just not a lot of it. It is what it is. Just keep your eyes on your rear view mirror.
Click to expand...

The bumper from a '71/'72 weighs quite a bit less than the '73 and IMHO looks a lot better.
 

4MuscleMachines

Member
Jul 20, 2005
417
1
17
South Texas
Feb 23, 2007
#10
  • Feb 23, 2007
  • #10
pushrod power said:
The bumper from a '71/'72 weighs quite a bit less than the '73 and IMHO looks a lot better.
Click to expand...

I wasn't aware of that, that would explain why my 71 front bumper weighs about 30lbs at most.
 

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Feb 23, 2007
#11
  • Feb 23, 2007
  • #11
The actually changed the front fenders on the 73 mustangs to accommodate the 5mph bumper.
 
G

Gud T.B. Blown

Member
Dec 9, 2004
583
1
18
Feb 23, 2007
#12
  • Feb 23, 2007
  • #12
4MuscleMachines said:
I wasn't aware of that, that would explain why my 71 front bumper weighs about 30lbs at most.
Click to expand...

The '73 front bumper has a nice pice of sqaure tubing under the cover that runs the length of it.
 
G

Gud T.B. Blown

Member
Dec 9, 2004
583
1
18
Feb 23, 2007
#13
  • Feb 23, 2007
  • #13
jikelly said:
The actually changed the front fenders on the 73 mustangs to accommodate the 5mph bumper.
Click to expand...

That is the rumor but I don't believe it to be fact. Notice that nobody sells a '73 specific hood. If the front fenders were truly longer, as I've been told, then you would need a different hood as well.
From practical experience I can tell you that a '71 bumper WILL bolt and line up on '73 fenders because I've done it. You will also need to change the lower valence as well.
 

CochinoFilipino

Founding Member
Jan 14, 2002
171
2
19
CA
Feb 23, 2007
#14
  • Feb 23, 2007
  • #14
zookeeper said:
,,,,,,,,, the bumper on my '68 isn't worth much in a crash anyway.
Click to expand...

But who know how many times our cars get tapped when parked? The old bumpers may not be that great in a crash, but they can protect our cars from the occasional love tap.
 

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Feb 24, 2007
#15
  • Feb 24, 2007
  • #15
pushrod power said:
That is the rumor but I don't believe it to be fact. Notice that nobody sells a '73 specific hood. If the front fenders were truly longer, as I've been told, then you would need a different hood as well.
From practical experience I can tell you that a '71 bumper WILL bolt and line up on '73 fenders because I've done it. You will also need to change the lower valence as well.
Click to expand...

I wondered if the earlier bumpers would bolt up or not. I figured they would, but I know that the fenders on the 71 and 72 are a different shape than the 73's.
 

Platonic Solid

Founding Member
May 29, 2002
1,960
5
39
CT-USA
Feb 24, 2007
#16
  • Feb 24, 2007
  • #16
The easiest way to reduce the front urethane bumper weight would be to replace the heavy steel channel that runs the length of the bumper with an identical aluminum one (though that would be a rather expensive custom fabrication project unless you have friends in the metal punching and forming business). There is a smaller steel tube molded into the urethane which you can not replace.

The difference between 73 fenders vs. 71-2 is the front profile. The "L" shaped chrome (or painted) front molding is taller on the 73 urethane bumpered fender (and the fender profile matches the molding). The area below these moldings is also different - 71-2 fenders have a deeper recess (and a black rubber filler piece when use with the chrome bumper) where the bumper ends fit near the fender - 73 fenders have a significantly smaller and lower recess in this area (and no rubber piece).

Though it is physically possible to replace your 73 urethane bumper with a 71-2 chrome one, you'll run into several issues: bumper mounting brackets are different, grill is different, you have to replace the tall fender moldings with the short ones (causing an unsightly gap which looks like crap) and bumper alignment problems due to the fender profile differences mentioned. In other words, don't do it - you will regret it.
 
C

C0V3R

Member
Feb 14, 2003
524
0
16
Australia
Feb 24, 2007
#17
  • Feb 24, 2007
  • #17
CochinoFilipino said:
But who know how many times our cars get tapped when parked? The old bumpers may not be that great in a crash, but they can protect our cars from the occasional love tap.
Click to expand...



Thats certainly true IME
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Feb 25, 2007
#18
  • Feb 25, 2007
  • #18
Platonic - it looks like you know a lot about the differences between the '72 and '73 bumpers - you may be able to help me.

I've got a '72 car but the guy I bought it from had a '73 bumper/grill put on and like you say it doesn't line up quite right.

I've been trying to figure out what all I'll need to replace to turn it back to a '72 since there are now aftermarket replacements.

Here are the pics: http://www.flickr.com/photos/wesratcliff/sets/72157594556614818/

What should I be shopping for?

Thanks,
Wes
 

Platonic Solid

Founding Member
May 29, 2002
1,960
5
39
CT-USA
Feb 26, 2007
#19
  • Feb 26, 2007
  • #19
Stanger007 said:
Platonic - it looks like you know a lot about the differences between the '72 and '73 bumpers - you may be able to help me.

I've got a '72 car but the guy I bought it from had a '73 bumper/grill put on and like you say it doesn't line up quite right.

I've been trying to figure out what all I'll need to replace to turn it back to a '72 since there are now aftermarket replacements.

Here are the pics: http://www.flickr.com/photos/wesratcliff/sets/72157594556614818/

What should I be shopping for?

Thanks,
Wes
Click to expand...

​
Looks to me like either an inner bumper bracket alignment problem, or the full length steel channel that the bumper is mounted to is bent, and/or inner mounting bracket(s) are damaged. You have 73 fenders, grill and bumper. I can't tell, but I assume you have a 73 front valance. (73 valance has no signal light mounting). If the grille was not cut into to accomodate the shorter 71-72 hood latch, then you also have the longer lever 73 hood latch mechanism.

It would be rather costly to bring it back to a 72 as you would have to replace all visible front end parts (plus the bumper mounting brackets) except the hood. New fenders, Left and Right front fender molding, valance, grille, and worst of all locate a 72 urethane bumper (I haven't seen that available anywhere as a repro) and full length bumper support bracket (I don't know if that's available as a repro either) and a short lever 71-72 hood latch (also unavailable as repro). I suppose you could go for the repro chrome bumper, but you'd still need the bumper support and then you'd want to get the chrome fender and hood molding also. (It just doesn't look right to have a chrome bumper with painted molding IMHO).

If you decide to keep your current configuration and would like me to take a few pics of the proper inner bumper mounting bracket orientation, just let me know. As I currently have the bumper, valance and grille removed from the 73 Mach.
 

Attachments

  • 402621281_0ecb8143de.webp
    59.5 KB · Views: 194

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Feb 27, 2007
#20
  • Feb 27, 2007
  • #20
Platonic Solid said:
If you decide to keep your current configuration and would like me to take a few pics of the proper inner bumper mounting bracket orientation, just let me know. As I currently have the bumper, valance and grille removed from the 73 Mach.
Click to expand...

Wow I didn't realize they changed THAT much stuff between '72 and '73!!!

My grill WAS cut into for the short latch like you mentioned so I must still have a '72 front hood latch but evidently that's as far as the 72-ishness extends.

I'd love some pictures of your setup on the '73... I will just stick with that since there is so much to replace!

Thanks!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
800
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
D
Engine Light 302 roller build for ffr Cobra
  • derekandjennys
  • Oct 29, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 30, 2020
Mustang5L5
Build Thread 1978 Fairmont. I bet somebody back home’s thinkin’…I wonder why he don’t write..?
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Aug 27, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 137 138 139
Replies
3K
Views
384K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 7, 2025
Rdub6
C
Wheels-Tires Help with wheel selection. 93gt with lsc rotors and 94 rear
  • claypoolxx
  • Apr 21, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
792
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 21, 2020
claypoolxx
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?