• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Another Rear End

  • Thread starter Thread starter crzipilot
  • Start date Start date May 29, 2007
C

crzipilot

Member
Apr 6, 2003
51
0
6
Sarasota, Fl
May 29, 2007
#1
  • May 29, 2007
  • #1
Does anyone know if a '66 Fairlane 9 inch rear will fit under a '65 mustang. Think one has to move the perches, but think that's it??? Been reading all the threads on the rear end swaps, and have to admit....quite confused at this point....
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 29, 2007
#2
  • May 29, 2007
  • #2
I see you've found the one on ebay. It's two inches wider, otherwise it'll bolt right in. I emailed the seller for better pics, the one pictured sure looks like an 8" to me.
 
C

crzipilot

Member
Apr 6, 2003
51
0
6
Sarasota, Fl
May 29, 2007
#3
  • May 29, 2007
  • #3
Ack, you found me out. Ya saw it on ebay, didn't look real close as didn't have time, was going to go back and look, but alas. I have found some complete 9" rears for 125 or so, and some Exploder rears for cheaper or same price with disc, but leaning towards something a little easier...
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 29, 2007
#4
  • May 29, 2007
  • #4
That 66 Comet rear disappeared, I figured you bought it. I hope someone got what they paid for and not an expensive 8".
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 29, 2007
#5
  • May 29, 2007
  • #5
The Exploder rears can be a great deal, just watch the ratio. I looked at 7 of em in one yard a few months ago, two had 3.08's and drums open diff, three had 3.73's, posi and drums, two had 3.73's, posi and discs. I settled for an 81 Bronco 9" with 3.50's and traction loc. If I could have found an Exploder rear with 4.11's and trac-loc, I'd have ******ed that up instead. Costs the same to narrow the 9 & 8.8's.
 
C

crzipilot

Member
Apr 6, 2003
51
0
6
Sarasota, Fl
May 30, 2007
#6
  • May 30, 2007
  • #6
No, I didn't buy it. Still deciding which way to go. Have to talk to a buddy of mine, that does rear ends and trannies, and see what he can do for me too.

As to the Exploder rears. reading the write ups (maybe I was just too tired) but it just seemed a bit more confusing cutting those down....

Thanks for the info though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
389
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Monday at 2:45 PM
joeybuddy96
J
B
Tire size question 1986 gt hatchback
  • B0udreaux
  • Jan 12, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
475
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 17, 2026
B0udreaux
B
New Products From J&M Products - 1979-1998 & 1999-2004 Race/Extreme Duty Rear Lower Control Arms
  • J&M Products
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
0
Views
236
Vendor Sponsor Forums Oct 9, 2025
J&M Products
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Monday at 10:16 PM
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
101
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Tuesday at 8:58 PM
Noobz347
Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
7
Views
120
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Wednesday at 4:03 AM
extra_stout
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?