• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Any advantage to a 93 cobra engine??

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1993SSP
  • Start date Start date Mar 27, 2008

1993SSP

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2001
1,194
0
37
Ky
Mar 27, 2008
#1
  • Mar 27, 2008
  • #1
My friend who works at the JY called me to come look at a mustang engine, said someone had looked at it and said it was a Corba engine from a 93 model, I noticed it had the black steel valve covers, we pulled one of the covers and sure enough it had crane roller rockers. The engine would need a rebuild I would assume since a few of the freeze out plugs are gone. Are the heads themselves worth anything?? I have a prefectly good bottom end ready to go, trying to piece some cheap items together for my next project
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 27, 2008
#2
  • Mar 27, 2008
  • #2
It has GT40 iron heads and 1.7 roller rockers...aside from the intake and a crappy '94 Thunderbird 5.0 cam, it's the same as any 5.0 HO. If you can't get it for cheap, you would arguably be better off with an Explorer 5.0.
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Mar 27, 2008
#3
  • Mar 27, 2008
  • #3
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
It has GT40 iron heads and 1.7 roller rockers...aside from the intake and a crappy '94 Thunderbird 5.0 cam, it's the same as any 5.0 HO. If you can't get it for cheap, you would arguably be better off with an Explorer 5.0.
Click to expand...

Can't say it any better.
 

JH96GT

Founding Member
Aug 20, 2000
1,526
13
124
Twilight Zone, TN.
Mar 27, 2008
#4
  • Mar 27, 2008
  • #4
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
It has GT40 iron heads and 1.7 roller rockers...aside from the intake and a crappy '94 Thunderbird 5.0 cam, it's the same as any 5.0 HO. If you can't get it for cheap, you would arguably be better off with an Explorer 5.0.
Click to expand...

Dumb question: What is so special about the exploder motor's?
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Mar 27, 2008
#5
  • Mar 27, 2008
  • #5
other than the exploder prolly being cheaper, I would say the cobra is better. you will still have to change the cam in the exploder, the oil pan, remove the DIS, blockoff plate and flywheel.

if the cobra motor is untouched it has the added bonus of the rr's and 24lb injectors. snag the maf and ecu and you will be a step ahead of the explorer motor without having to change a bunch of parts.
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Mar 27, 2008
#6
  • Mar 27, 2008
  • #6
JH96GT said:
Dumb question: What is so special about the exploder motor's?
Click to expand...

Both the heads and intake are comparable to the cobra stuff; in fact, the GT40P heads on the explorer motor are probably a bit better (untouched) than the cobra GT40's. Combine this with the fact that they can be found very cheap, it has made them pretty popular.
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Mar 27, 2008
#7
  • Mar 27, 2008
  • #7
the gt40ps have a slighy advantage over the non P heads. but the plug angle scares people away.

the P heads are underated and can make some nice power. AFAIK the P heads are the best flowing production head ford made for the SBF.

and the cobra engine has gt-40 heads and cobra intake. swap the cam out to a mild cam and it should wake up. the stock cam in those is good for drivability but there is power to be had with those heads and intake.

what i dont understand is why ford didnt run the gt-40 heads on all mustangs. lol
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 27, 2008
#8
  • Mar 27, 2008
  • #8
JH96GT said:
Dumb question: What is so special about the exploder motor's?
Click to expand...

Well the P heads are slightly better than the non P heads...but the catch is the header issue...hence the "arguably better" comment. Some people make the header issue out to be a big deal, even though the P heads make more power and are worth having over the non P heads.
 

LiquidGT

Member
Oct 8, 2007
368
0
16
Near STL hell
Mar 27, 2008
#9
  • Mar 27, 2008
  • #9
Foxfan88 said:
what i dont understand is why ford didnt run the gt-40 heads on all mustangs. lol
Click to expand...

I thought about that too, I always figured they had to have something to make the Cobra "better".
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,235
17,920
224
Massachusetts
Mar 27, 2008
#10
  • Mar 27, 2008
  • #10
I don't think the Cobras come with Crane rockers. I thought they were Ford's own 1.72's??

Black VC's don't mean much. My VC's are from a 94-95 and they are the black steel versions like on the Cobra.

Does it have the 24# injectors, GT-40 heads, Cobra Intake, 65mm TB and Cobra EEC??

Was it even in a Cobra?

Keep in mind there were only 5000 Cobra's made, so true Cobra 5.0 engines are hard to come by, but the parts can be put on a regular 5.0 easily and passed off as one. Can't tell you how many "Mustang with Cobra engines" i've seen that are nothing more than a stock 5.0 with a Cobra intake on it
 

68stang351

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
850
9
39
Savoy TX
Mar 27, 2008
#11
  • Mar 27, 2008
  • #11
A lot of older non-H.O.s also came with those black stamped valve covers.
 

cevtv

Founding Member
Sep 15, 2002
1,113
0
37
Massachusetts
Mar 29, 2008
#12
  • Mar 29, 2008
  • #12
Mustang5L5 said:
I don't think the Cobras come with Crane rockers. I thought they were Ford's own 1.72's??
Click to expand...

They are.....Ford Racing, made by Crane.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
798
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Engine Pushrod Length?
  • foxbodyclark
  • Jan 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
352
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 25, 2025
limp
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
594
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
2
Bought an engine for my project
  • 2stroke1971
  • Jul 7, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2024
limp
Progress Thread Cobra II Resurrection
  • welder4956
  • Mar 16, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
1K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Apr 25, 2026
welder4956
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?