• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Any real chance of engine damage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Betrayer00GT
  • Start date Start date Sep 3, 2007

Betrayer00GT

Member
Apr 21, 2003
364
0
16
Sacramento, CA
Sep 3, 2007
#1
  • Sep 3, 2007
  • #1
So,

Recently dropped to second gear a bit prematurely and got the engine up to about 6.6K RPM. I was down shifting to slow down, so I didn't have any throttle applied. It was only up that high for a split second before it climbed quickly down as I decelerated with brakes plus engine-braking.

No unusual signs/symptoms, but I was wondering if anyone thought there might be a good chance of un-obvious weakening/damage that I could not tell with my own ears or just by feel, etc.

So, any one think there is a good chance there might be?
 
S

shook0002

New Member
Oct 1, 2003
8
0
0
philadelphia
Sep 4, 2007
#2
  • Sep 4, 2007
  • #2
If its still sounds good your probably ok. Usually the clutch will explode b4 the motor with a downshift like that.
 

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
StateCollege PA
Sep 4, 2007
#3
  • Sep 4, 2007
  • #3
i'd run compression check. If your valve got intimate with piston, compression check would tell ya
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Sep 4, 2007
#4
  • Sep 4, 2007
  • #4
Betrayer00GT said:
So,

Recently dropped to second gear a bit prematurely and got the engine up to about 6.6K RPM. I was down shifting to slow down, so I didn't have any throttle applied. It was only up that high for a split second before it climbed quickly down as I decelerated with brakes plus engine-braking.

No unusual signs/symptoms, but I was wondering if anyone thought there might be a good chance of un-obvious weakening/damage that I could not tell with my own ears or just by feel, etc.

So, any one think there is a good chance there might be?
Click to expand...

Honestly I wouldn't worry about it. If you did any serious damage, you would know, trust me. If you are really worried about it, do a quick compression check to see how the engine looks. Although, even there is damage, you would never know what actually caused the problem. I say you drive it like you stole it.
 

Betrayer00GT

Member
Apr 21, 2003
364
0
16
Sacramento, CA
Sep 4, 2007
#5
  • Sep 4, 2007
  • #5
So, seems like the agreement is "likely ok - want to check, do a compression test", right?

So, related question:

What is a good compression value for a 2000 GT with <56K on it? I believe my compression is less than an 01+, but what exactly would I be looking for?

Second, what does everyone think of buying something like this from HF (they are local) so I can check when I want? I am not worried about using it, I installed the spark plugs that are in there now. I can remove/reinstall them to use this thing.

If not the HF unit though, where and how much?

Thanks guys.

:SNSign:
 

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
StateCollege PA
Sep 4, 2007
#6
  • Sep 4, 2007
  • #6
unless your car was running funny before, exact compression value is unimportant, as more then likely your compression was fine before.
Just run the test. And make sure that lowest reading cylinder must be within 15 psi of highest reading cylinder. If more then that, then add bit of oil to cylinder. if compression returne significantly, then you have ring issue, and if compression don't return, valve dmg is more then likely
 

Barrier

New Member
May 11, 2005
155
0
0
Sep 4, 2007
#7
  • Sep 4, 2007
  • #7
Just go grab a compression tester from autozone or something for 20 bucks... it's easy as pie for these cars. Takes about 45 minutes if youve ever changed your plugs before. Some people say to grab an exact amount of spikes of the needle, like around 6, and some people say to keep cranking the car until the needle stops... either way you'll know if theres a problem with one cylinder. Also remember to disable the fuel injectors/supply unless you want fuel to be squirting into the cyls while the plugs are out

EDIT: Yeah... harbor freight is very cheap quality but it's a compression tester. It's gonna be 20 bucks pretty much anywhere.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 4, 2007
#8
  • Sep 4, 2007
  • #8
If you didn't or don't hear of 'feel' anything, don't sweat it.
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Sep 4, 2007
#9
  • Sep 4, 2007
  • #9
mity2 said:
unless your car was running funny before, exact compression value is unimportant, as more then likely your compression was fine before.
Just run the test. And make sure that lowest reading cylinder must be within 15 psi of highest reading cylinder. If more then that, then add bit of oil to cylinder. if compression returne significantly, then you have ring issue, and if compression don't return, valve dmg is more then likely
Click to expand...

I believe you want to compare the AVERAGE of all the numbers combined with the lowest number. Then if the difference is more than 15%, you have a problem with either the rings or valves.
 

Barrier

New Member
May 11, 2005
155
0
0
Sep 4, 2007
#10
  • Sep 4, 2007
  • #10
Or head gasket

srsl though... the compression test is just a double check. If your cars running, and not making any death notes, you're perfectly fine.
 
R

rugster

New Member
Aug 31, 2004
156
0
0
Sep 4, 2007
#11
  • Sep 4, 2007
  • #11
I spun a rod bearing by shifting into 2nd instead of 4th on a WOT run....rpms went all the way around Spun a rod bearing, blew the motor, but if you dont hear the ticking, and only went to 6600 I wouldnt sweat it. Good luck
 

RedDaemon

10 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,470
9
108
Atlanta, GA
Sep 4, 2007
#12
  • Sep 4, 2007
  • #12
funny...i did the same exact thing today..only i caught it at about 4-5k (i think )

you should be fine
 

Betrayer00GT

Member
Apr 21, 2003
364
0
16
Sacramento, CA
Sep 6, 2007
#13
  • Sep 6, 2007
  • #13
Well, the drag strip didn't shake anything loose, as I feared it might.

14.3 was the best I could do ( ), but the conditions at Sacramento Raceway for the Street-legal Fun Drags tonight were fairly bad. From the dead 60' sensor in the lane I used every time but the last one, to the complete lack of track-prep (normal for Wednesdays), to the fact that I didn't get a run in after 7PM - which was way before the weather really cooled down.

Anyway, seems nothing is majorly wrong with the stang, or I never could have even pulled that out of it. I am happy. Not ecstatic, but definitely happy.

Fun was had by all; me and my newly reunited brother.
 
S

showstopper2

Founding Member
Apr 16, 2001
425
0
0
New Bedford, Ma.
Sep 6, 2007
#14
  • Sep 6, 2007
  • #14
how could the car rev that high without bouncing off the rev limiter? the car is set with a 6250 limiter unless you have a chip and had it changed.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Sep 6, 2007
#15
  • Sep 6, 2007
  • #15
The car had to hit the limiter. IF the tach said 6,600 it could have just jumped. Stock tachs are not as accurate as the aftermarket tachs. If you motor runs fine, don't worry about it.
 

BennyBlown2v

New Member
Dec 9, 2004
1,233
1
0
Carmel, INdiana
Sep 6, 2007
#16
  • Sep 6, 2007
  • #16
rugster said:
I spun a rod bearing by shifting into 2nd instead of 4th on a WOT run....rpms went all the way around Spun a rod bearing, blew the motor, but if you dont hear the ticking, and only went to 6600 I wouldnt sweat it. Good luck
Click to expand...

Lol I did that in my old SVTf when some douche bag cut in front of me when a car club I was in was caravaning (literally 30 cars all in a row, in the right lane...) to a car show - 5-2 shift = BOOM! Luckily the knock sensors killed the motor and I coasted to a safe stop....but it did rev out to 9k rpm or so before it cut off haha! Those motors are damn stout though...

And guys, the rev limiter is only for when you're powering the car, its so it doesn't give it enough fuel/spark to keep gaining RPM - when you downshift the speed of the wheels is directly translated into engine RPM. So, it is physically causing the motor to rev higher....rev limiter has no use then, because you're already going faster (MPH), and the rev limiter itself can't do anything about that.
 

Betrayer00GT

Member
Apr 21, 2003
364
0
16
Sacramento, CA
Sep 6, 2007
#17
  • Sep 6, 2007
  • #17
BennyBlown2v said:
And guys, the rev limiter is only for when you're powering the car, its so it doesn't give it enough fuel/spark to keep gaining RPM - when you downshift the speed of the wheels is directly translated into engine RPM. So, it is physically causing the motor to rev higher....rev limiter has no use then, because you're already going faster (MPH), and the rev limiter itself can't do anything about that.
Click to expand...

Exactly, it was mechanical with the tire speed spinning the engine too fast. It had nothing to do with how much I was on the throttle (which was not at all).

Also, my tach tells me I have an idle of ~950, so it probably reads high. The previous owner put in a white gauge face sheet (with the cobra redline, which I didn't reach - lol) in my GT, so that could have tweaked its accuracy a bit, if nothing else does.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 6, 2007
#18
  • Sep 6, 2007
  • #18
Yeah, you could have revved right at the 'potential' rev-limiter...

You don't set rpm at idle with installing new guages, which I'm sure you know You should set it at a higher rpm cruise, like 3,000 or so.
 

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
StateCollege PA
Sep 6, 2007
#19
  • Sep 6, 2007
  • #19
showstopper2 said:
how could the car rev that high without bouncing off the rev limiter? the car is set with a 6250 limiter unless you have a chip and had it changed.
Click to expand...


Would not have mattered.
He said he downshifted in to 2nd prematurely and got the engine up to about 6.6K RPM while car is moving.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Is it normal for all of this to go wrong or did I get played when I bought this ONLY A MONTH AGO.
  • ponygal02
  • Nov 14, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
272
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 14, 2025
Noobz347
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
986
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
J
Emission problems
  • jls.zmmr
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
247
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
137
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
461
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?