• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Anyone running catalytic converter on a turbo setup?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mstng93SSP
  • Start date Start date Apr 13, 2021
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,126
21,292
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 21, 2021
#21
  • Apr 21, 2021
  • #21
A couple of things come to mind:

Those catalytic converter images above look small. Very small. It's hard to imagine an exhaust system that you've calculated is right around the size it needs to be for the power we want to produce then putting a perforated plug into the mix. It seems to me that surface area of the catalyst need to be quite a bit larger in order to accommodate the same mass of air as the rest of the exhaust. In the words: It should be much larger.

The other thing that comes to mind about cats before turbos is the time that it spends cold and filling up those little holes with muck before it perfectly hot.


If I had nothing but time and money, I'd try installing two of those little cats in parallel on each side and see if it blew them out over time --or-- plumb a 4-inch cat inline with a 3-inch exhaust and see if that helped.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,126
21,292
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 21, 2021
#22
  • Apr 21, 2021
  • #22
MustangIIMatt said:
This is exactly the problem.

If you go back to that BMW engine I posted the picture of, it has a total of four catalytic converters, two of which are bolted directly to the turbos on top of the engine. They're big, damned big, bigger than the single Mike posted a pic of, and this is for a 4.4L engine making approximately 500 horsepower at the flywheel.

When I put the turbo behind the 4V in the Mustang II, it'll be a large, 3" in/out unit of a size for a 6.2L or larger N/A engine.
Click to expand...
Do they also have any type of bellows or surge tube between the turbo and converter?
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,721
214
Hillsborough county
Apr 21, 2021
#23
  • Apr 21, 2021
  • #23
My f150 has two huge converters right after the turbo. Easily twice the diameter of the pipe
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Apr 21, 2021
#24
  • Apr 21, 2021
  • #24
a91what said:
My f150 has two huge converters right after the turbo. Easily twice the diameter of the pipe
Click to expand...
theorizing here -
Besides on OEM turbo engines, a Hellcat has to have big and durable Cats. 700 Hp of airflow should not be much different between NA and turbo, except the turbo could take some of the heat out.
 

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
Apr 22, 2021
#25
  • Apr 22, 2021
  • #25
Now that my car is up and running with the turbo I don't seem to have any horrible exhaust smell like I remember before with no cats and stock ECU. I'm sure the tune has a lot to do with it.
 
Reactions: Monkeybutt2000
M

Monkeybutt2000

Mustang Master
Aug 11, 2019
1,387
849
133
Lafayette,IN
Apr 23, 2021
#26
  • Apr 23, 2021
  • #26
Mstng93SSP said:
Now that my car is up and running with the turbo I don't seem to have any horrible exhaust smell like I remember before with no cats and stock ECU. I'm sure the tune has a lot to do with it.
Click to expand...
Mine was the same way, whatever voodoo Steve used worked very well.
 

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
Apr 23, 2021
#27
  • Apr 23, 2021
  • #27
Yeah, but I just got back from driving the car, I reverse into the garage and the queen of the house says "your car stinks!" Hmmm........
 

jozsefsz

15 Year Member
Aug 11, 2013
1,243
332
124
Cleveland OH Area
Apr 23, 2021
#28
  • Apr 23, 2021
  • #28
I run a 3" 3-way cat on my downpipe. I passed tail-pipe emissions here in Ohio up until last year (I had to retard timing a bit for NOx because I deleted EGR) when it was no longer required. It's had no noticeable negative effect on a street-driven (since 2009) turbo 5.0's performance (though I only ran with it off briefly before I decided I wanted to pass emissions). Sure the VE is probably reduced a little, but the beauty of a turbo is you can bump up the boost controller a notch and more than compensate. Guess it depends on your area, your desire to remain legal (especially if you ever want to sell the car), and how much you care about the hydrocarbons huffing out of it. With that said my wastegate uses a dump-pipe so take that for what you will.

One thing of note, at boost you're probably running 10.5-11:1 AFR. It's gonna get smelly or you're gonna burn pistons, one or the other.
 

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
Apr 23, 2021
#29
  • Apr 23, 2021
  • #29
We don't do any smog testing here.
 

jozsefsz

15 Year Member
Aug 11, 2013
1,243
332
124
Cleveland OH Area
Apr 23, 2021
#30
  • Apr 23, 2021
  • #30
Mstng93SSP said:
We don't do any smog testing here.
Click to expand...
You can get hit with one of those RECON fines though and have to deal with it. HI laws specifically state if your car had a converter, it needs one (hi-flow spun converters are cool with them). Whether or not you'd like to gamble is up to you. I figure $100 for a MagnaFlow spun converter is worth the peace of mind, and while I'm not an environmentalist by any stretch, I don't care for the stench of raw fuel while I'm driving (nor do I imagine the people behind me in their convertibles do) and I do like to breathe when I can.
 

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
Apr 23, 2021
#31
  • Apr 23, 2021
  • #31
I'm not getting hit with any kind of fines or citations,....trust me on that.
 
Reactions: ThinBlue502 and Rdub6

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Apr 23, 2021
#32
  • Apr 23, 2021
  • #32
Mstng93SSP said:
We don't do any smog testing here.
Click to expand...
For now. I can see the feds wanting the flowers and pineapple to have clean air there after the cattle here have to fill Whoopee Cushions. How do they know if your spun cat is blown out?

I’m not surprised the newer computers can be tuned to run clean and well at the same time by someone with knowledge of cars and the software.
 

jozsefsz

15 Year Member
Aug 11, 2013
1,243
332
124
Cleveland OH Area
Apr 23, 2021
#33
  • Apr 23, 2021
  • #33
That's cool, to each their own. If you ever want to add one, it's easy and cheap enough to do and won't hurt anything. Only thing @7991LXnSHO no matter how good the tuner, the minimum AFR at boost to keep things cool enough not to blow a gasket, piston, or valve is around 12:1. That's pig-rich if naturally aspirated, and without a cat the whole neighborhood's going to smell it - especially the guy in the driver's seat on a nice warm day. If it's not that rich, you've got a time-bomb on your hands which is a function of the physics more than the tune.
 

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
Apr 23, 2021
#34
  • Apr 23, 2021
  • #34
My intention is to put a catalytic converter on the car. That was the purpose of me asking the question. My point was that there is no one, and I mean no one checking cars here to see if they have catalytic converters. Recon is a joke and they are working on legislation to get rid of it as it is only a money grab by the state.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Apr 23, 2021
#35
  • Apr 23, 2021
  • #35
jozsefsz said:
That's cool, to each their own. If you ever want to add one, it's easy and cheap enough to do and won't hurt anything. Only thing @7991LXnSHO no matter how good the tuner, the minimum AFR at boost to keep things cool enough not to blow a gasket, piston, or valve is around 12:1. That's pig-rich if naturally aspirated, and without a cat the whole neighborhood's going to smell it - especially the guy in the driver's seat on a nice warm day. If it's not that rich, you've got a time-bomb on your hands which is a function of the physics more than the tune.
Click to expand...
I was thinking of clean running when not under boost. I picture the tables can adjust for cruise and boost much better than a carb ever could. Melting pistons is bad.
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,721
214
Hillsborough county
Apr 23, 2021
#36
  • Apr 23, 2021
  • #36
jozsefsz said:
I run a 3" 3-way cat on my downpipe. I passed tail-pipe emissions here in Ohio up until last year (I had to retard timing a bit for NOx because I deleted EGR) when it was no longer required. It's had no noticeable negative effect on a street-driven (since 2009) turbo 5.0's performance (though I only ran with it off briefly before I decided I wanted to pass emissions). Sure the VE is probably reduced a little, but the beauty of a turbo is you can bump up the boost controller a notch and more than compensate. Guess it depends on your area, your desire to remain legal (especially if you ever want to sell the car), and how much you care about the hydrocarbons huffing out of it. With that said my wastegate uses a dump-pipe so take that for what you will.

One thing of note, at boost you're probably running 10.5-11:1 AFR. It's gonna get smelly or you're gonna burn pistons, one or the other.
Click to expand...
If you have to run at 10.5-11:1 afr to keep from melting the engine down your doing it wrong. That's pig rich even in boost.
 
Reactions: Monkeybutt2000 and TOOLOW91
B

bwest

Member
Oct 25, 2005
33
9
18
Apr 24, 2021
#37
  • Apr 24, 2021
  • #37
Mstng93SSP said:
My intention is to put a catalytic converter on the car. That was the purpose of me asking the question. My point was that there is no one, and I mean no one checking cars here to see if they have catalytic converters. Recon is a joke and they are working on legislation to get rid of it as it is only a money grab by the state.
Click to expand...
I used to run Random Tech cats on my turbo car way back when. Never had an issue, and I passed my tailpipe emissions no prob with it. Unfortunately, they aren't in business any longer. For cat's melting - I've seen that happen when a motor dumps excessive fuel and the cats meltdown from the heat during oxidation. Sized appropriately, tuned correctly, I highly highly doubt you'll have any issues.
 

jozsefsz

15 Year Member
Aug 11, 2013
1,243
332
124
Cleveland OH Area
Apr 26, 2021
#38
  • Apr 26, 2021
  • #38
a91what said:
If you have to run at 10.5-11:1 afr to keep from melting the engine down your doing it wrong. That's pig rich even in boost.
Click to expand...
You'll have to forgive my faulty memory as it's been a few years since I tuned mine, I run mine at 11.5 not 10.5. "Have to" and what's considered safe are two different things. What's considered 'safe' also varies according to how much boost you intend to run, I'm usually set to around 11psi -- for higher boost, 10.5 or even richer may be advisable. And as the SN95 doesn't have knock sensors, it's a guessing game if you're experiencing any knock so 'safe' timing is also a bit of a guessing game.

Been running this way on the same stock engine since 2009 without any failures and passing emissions, but you be you. Either way the point remains the same, at boost you're running significantly richer than 14.7 (unless you like replacing engines) so you're dumping some fuel and can benefit from a cat. Perhaps you can enlighten us on what 'doing it right' means rather than being pedantic?
 
Last edited: Apr 26, 2021

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Apr 26, 2021
#39
  • Apr 26, 2021
  • #39
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,721
214
Hillsborough county
Apr 26, 2021
#40
  • Apr 26, 2021
  • #40
jozsefsz said:
You'll have to forgive my faulty memory as it's been a few years since I tuned mine, I run mine at 11.5 not 10.5. "Have to" and what's considered safe are two different things. What's considered 'safe' also varies according to how much boost you intend to run, I'm usually set to around 11psi -- for higher boost, 10.5 or even richer may be advisable. And as the SN95 doesn't have knock sensors, it's a guessing game if you're experiencing any knock so 'safe' timing is also a bit of a guessing game.

Been running this way on the same stock engine since 2009 without any failures and passing emissions, but you be you. Either way the point remains the same, at boost you're running significantly richer than 14.7 (unless you like replacing engines) so you're dumping some fuel and can benefit from a cat. Perhaps you can enlighten us on what 'doing it right' means rather than being pedantic?
Click to expand...
I tune 3 to 4 cars a week. Anything below 12psi is 11.8-12.2 in boost depending on the engine design and fuel used.
11.5 is considered safe street afr above 12psi..

When I'm tuning a real engine making 4 digit numbers and 25+psi I may dip into the low 11 high 10 afr if I need to cool the piston crown, but this is done with special enrichment settings.
Most get the same 11.5 richest point at peak torque. I prefer to keep away from the lower flammable limit on the fuel used and simply not over time the engine.
If you need to over enrich the engine to eliminate or reduce knock chance then you have too much spark advance near peak torque (or in general). You can lift a ring land with an overly rich mixture when things go wrong or cause missfires and force a tighter than necessary plug gap.

If we are talking about low boost under 16psi... Then no reason to go below 11.5 unless you are making big power or trying to keep a hyper piston from exploding.

I rarely use or rely on a knock sensor, most of the time they are completely blind at wot anyway.

To summarize 11.5 is perfectly fine to target on a street tuned engine in boost for safety.
 
Reactions: Mstng93SSP and jozsefsz
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Catalytic Converter Calif Emissions
  • frwgt350net
  • Feb 28, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
356
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 2, 2026
frwgt350net
F
Resolved Three way cat converters..?
  • PonyGTrider
  • Nov 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
270
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 2, 2025
PonyGTrider
Fox HAD ENOUGH OF EXHAUST FUMES!!!
  • PonyGTrider
  • Aug 12, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 13, 2024
PonyGTrider
S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
107
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 26, 2026
AeroCoupe
G
2006 Mustang GT o2 Sensor Wiring Issue Car Bogging/Choking
  • GCantero93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Sep 6, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?