• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Anyone want to discuss throttle bodies? Is bigger better?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 5spd GT
  • Start date Start date Mar 25, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

BlooDReigN

Member
Feb 22, 2004
283
1
16
Calgary, Alberta
Mar 28, 2007
#21
  • Mar 28, 2007
  • #21
I think in the case of my intake manifold, I would likely lose horse power if I went down to a 75mm throttle body from my 90. The opening for the intake is 90mm and I bet with a 75mm on there, there would just be turbulence created where the throttlebody meets the manifold because of the 'lip' causing an unsmooth transition in to the intake.

As for calling it ricy...what kind of import can you get a 90mm throttle body for?
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Mar 29, 2007
#22
  • Mar 29, 2007
  • #22
Bloodreign - You have a 408, yours isn't ricey

It's the stock blocks/strokers that get a little carried away with it.

You can go just as fast with a 70 as a 90...I have yet to see otherwise...

Bigger throttle cost more to go the same speed...
 

stangjunkie

New Member
Nov 15, 2004
381
0
0
Mar 29, 2007
#23
  • Mar 29, 2007
  • #23
so here is my question. While were talking about this why not bring up maf's. Specifically what is the max flow of the stock 55mm Maf?? How much of an adverse affect could this have an a stock or even modified engine. I know we havn't talked much about flow rates of heads etc. but with a normal H/C/I car how much is a factory maf hurting?? (YES im asking this because this is me)
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Mar 29, 2007
#24
  • Mar 29, 2007
  • #24
I tend to look at the MAF and throttle bodies as fairly equal in their power they can let you have and power they can hold you back from as fairly linear.

The MAF has an obstruction in it with the sensor in the air path, while the throttle body has a blade/screws in the air path.


I know that 'Pro-M' (if I recall) they were saying that there 80mm MAF would support 800hp.
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Aug 28, 2007
#25
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #25
stang&2Birds said:
For NA cars, a 65mm or 70mm is fine. Over 70mm is ricer.

What's important is the *SETUP*! It's best if the TB is matched to the intake. So, in most cases. that means 65mm.

On SC setups, bigger is better. But, throttle response and idle control will suffer!

A TB is DIFFERENT than the MAF, intake tubes, or filter. For the latter 3, you want HUGE with ZERO restriction! The TB is VERY different. It's part of the intake setup. So, having it matched to the intake is important. However, you also want to prevent having too small a TB and have it be a restriction.
Click to expand...

so 75mm is big for a TT351 build?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Sick of stock TB and EGR spacer...
  • 91GTstroked
  • Dec 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
706
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 19, 2024
General karthief
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
G
Fuel Stock 1994 5.0 throttle body size
  • GOvert
  • Mar 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 1, 2025
95gt1985
9
Fox 329 HP low for a stroker?
  • Andresquintana.mma
  • Apr 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 19, 2025
Jarhead67
J
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
763
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?