Are there any issues re a 302 in a 1965 Mustang?

Alley Oop

Member
Mar 29, 2017
63
9
18
75
West Coast of Canada
I’m considering buying a 1965 Mustang. The 289 has been replaced with a 302, don’t know the vintage. It has a 4 speed manual transmission. The body looks good, pretty much rust free..

Are there any issues about the 302 that I should be concerned about? As far as I can tell, it is stock. I would probably want to replace the heads, cam, intake and carburetor just enough to boost it to about 300 hp. Comments please. Thanks in advance.

Mark
 
  • Sponsors(?)


Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
28,722
10,760
224
Box behind Walmart
www.stangnet.com
For every dollar you spend bringing that engine up to 300HP, you will spend 10 getting the rest of the car setup to handle it.

We'd really need to know more about the car and engine to be of help.

302s can range from 135HP up to the 230 range.
 

wicked93gs

10 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
783
71
38
Nashville TN
what issues would there be to be concerned about? A 302 is simply a bored out 289 after all. If you want 300HP, start with a late model explorer engine(GT40p), change the cam, add some headers and you will already be pretty close to 300HP...thats the cheapest way to get there
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2Blue2

2Blue2

will be trying this sex one when I can find it
Mar 5, 2019
1,969
1,122
123
52
Oahu
289-302 Pretty much interchangeable.
Differences are based on 28.2 or 50 oz imbalance crank.
 

Alley Oop

Member
Mar 29, 2017
63
9
18
75
West Coast of Canada
Thanks for the input guys. I wanted to hear from someone with experience with this sort of combo.
If you had a choice between say a 1989 Mustang 5 litre with a 5 speed manual trans or a
1965 with a 302, 4 speed manual trans, both cars in good condition, which would present the fewest
headaches as far as reliability and availability of parts? Lets say I left both of them in stock condition.
They would only be driven on dry days, so maybe 5000 miles per year max.
 

2Blue2

will be trying this sex one when I can find it
Mar 5, 2019
1,969
1,122
123
52
Oahu
I'm a 65 guy

There both old cars and reliability would be based on state of repair.
 

Olivethefet

Slap me as well as point and laugh
May 17, 2018
1,709
1,121
123
39
Enterprise AL
Old cars always demand love from time to time, so no matter which you went with you'll be working on it to a degree. If the 65 is mechanically sound I would think that it might possible give less issues and be easier to work on. Before I get blown out of the water for saying that I am basing that statement on the fact that the 65 is a much simpler design with fewer electronic parts and gizmos to malfunction. Both cars have a lot of aftermarket support in regards to parts. I dont think that would really be a part of the deciding factor.

I'd say in the end it would come down to personal preference. Based on your avatar it looks like you already have a Fox so maybe branch out with the 65!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2Blue2

Alley Oop

Member
Mar 29, 2017
63
9
18
75
West Coast of Canada
The avatar is a pic of my /90 7 up. Never should have sold it but I've made worse mistakes. I'm caught between maybe going with /65 - /66 or /89 - /93, but I am leaning more toward another Fox. Thanks for the help guys.
Mark
 

rustaddict

Active Member
Aug 23, 2014
217
55
38
47
Thanks for the input guys. I wanted to hear from someone with experience with this sort of combo.
If you had a choice between say a 1989 Mustang 5 litre with a 5 speed manual trans or a
1965 with a 302, 4 speed manual trans, both cars in good condition, which would present the fewest
headaches as far as reliability and availability of parts? Lets say I left both of them in stock condition.
They would only be driven on dry days, so maybe 5000 miles per year max.
The 1989. Hands down
 

wicked93gs

10 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
783
71
38
Nashville TN
Thanks for the input guys. I wanted to hear from someone with experience with this sort of combo.
If you had a choice between say a 1989 Mustang 5 litre with a 5 speed manual trans or a
1965 with a 302, 4 speed manual trans, both cars in good condition, which would present the fewest
headaches as far as reliability and availability of parts? Lets say I left both of them in stock condition.
They would only be driven on dry days, so maybe 5000 miles per year max.
The Toploader T4 trans is virtually indestructible(something you can't say about the T5). Availability of parts is going to be roughly the same, maybe tilting toward the old 302(they made a crap-ton more non-roller block 302s over a longer time span) but most parts between the 2 engines are interchangeable. I would even go so far as to say the reliability would be pretty close to the same as well, tilting in the favor of the fuel injected motor(carbs do go out-of-tune more often and run better on non-ethanol fuel). I drove my old 67 Mustang with a 289 for a decade....ended up being the most reliable car I have ever owned...and the simplest to work on.

As for your un-asked question of value...the 65 Mustang any day of the week...unless the 89 is a notchback in excellent condition, the 65 will be more valuable...even if the 65 is a coupe.

If you are waiting months between drives though, the foxbody will be more willing to start after sitting for long periods of time. I am not a fan of sticking ANY car in a garage and never driving it though...cars were meant to be driven, even if its only once a week.
 

Alley Oop

Member
Mar 29, 2017
63
9
18
75
West Coast of Canada
I drove my /90 on any day that was dry. I buy a Mustang to drive it, I'm not interested in only taking it on the road infrequently. My next Mustang will be
a driver as well. How can you tell the difference between a 4 speed trans and a top loader? The guy that's selling the /65 coupe has the trans listed as a 4 speed.
 

Olivethefet

Slap me as well as point and laugh
May 17, 2018
1,709
1,121
123
39
Enterprise AL
I think the factory ford 4 speed that came in the first gen mustang is a top loader. I dont think there was another option. :shrug:
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Nick Bos Starter gear doesn’t engage fully with flexplate 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- 0
J 1970 Mustang Mach 1 Intake Manifold Issue Classic Mustang Specific Tech 1
J 1968 302 / C4 Vibration Issue Mystery 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- 7
C Engine (Problem) Converting 1987 fox to carbed setup Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 5
PakstinN fox body running rough after see 130 amp alternator conversion 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- 7
G Engine cooling issues on a blown 302 Classic Mustang Specific Tech 1
N 86 5.0 Fox Body No Crank Issue (fusible Link/clutch Safety Switch) Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 51
YadiStang 1969 Covertible - 302..opinions On My Ride Height Issues 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- 5
Mona91 302 (347) Ford Thrust Bearing Issues 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- 22
C 89 302 Cold Stsrt Issue Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 1
M Installation Issues With 1966 Hipo Exhaust On New 302 Engine. 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- 1
MustangMando 1990 302 Efi First Startup Issues 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- 8
B Electrical Issue Ford 302 Other Auto Tech 0
89stang302gt Ford Racing Boss 302 issues? Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 8
Bosscat 60 over 68 302 block, over heating issues? Classic Mustang Specific Tech 15
8 302 issues Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 37
Nicoleb3x3 Motor Mount issue in a 2.3 to 302 swap Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 4
D wanting to put E7 heads on a 1984 302. Valve clearence issues??? Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 1
Daytrip carb 302 fuel pump issues Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 6
jadesville 302 and Canton Girdle Issues Classic Mustang Specific Tech 5
T PATS Issue or something else 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- 0
D CJ Pony issues 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- 2
T T5 swapped 67 with clutch issues Other Auto Tech 0
S Emergency brake light issue 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- 1
0 Door lock switch and power window issues 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- 1
T Engine EGR spacer rear hose replacement. '93 5.0 Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 8
E A/C issue 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- 0
J Engine 93 Timing Issues Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 4
9 Engine Having a misfire issue on one cylinder Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 8
foxbodybill89 Electrical sudden electrical issue Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 2
9 94 5.0L issue with keeping the engine running 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech 3
G Engine Need help with cooling system issue Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 12
M 2001 GT no start electrical issue SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech 10
Cameron96 Engine Starter meshing issue after hard starts Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 8
B Secondary Air pump issue 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- 2
R Passenger side leak issues and cowl questions 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- 1
C Engine Gray smoke from exhaust. Smells like gas. Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 15
D Hellion Twin Turbo Air Conditioning Issue 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech 1
C Issues staying running 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- 0
J Idle issue still!! Replaced several parts.. looking for more ideas!! Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 12
Z I need help with pistons 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- 1
D 93 2.3 crank but no fire 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech 18
M Engine Ignition Timing Issues 1985 Fox Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 2
C Foxbody with no start issues Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 5
S Another Idle surge post with microsquirt Digital Self-tuning Forum 5
J Engine 93 5.0 issues with iddle and no power. Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 2
Mystang66 Solenoid issue? 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech 7
F Electrical Tracking down my always full fuel gauge issue....89 Notch 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech 3
sigsterrr Electrical Charging issue Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech 8
T Parasitic drain - SJB issue 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- 7
Similar threads