• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

ARP Head bolt torque? asap...

  • Thread starter Thread starter latham83
  • Start date Start date Feb 21, 2004

latham83

New Member
Jul 24, 2003
496
0
0
Feb 21, 2004
#1
  • Feb 21, 2004
  • #1
Hey....ok my ARP instructions say to torque their BOLTS to 65 ft/lbs with their moly lube....im using thumper heads..so they are stock ported..not aluminum..
Now I did not buy their moly lube or sealer..because i read in a magazine and from various ppl that Permatex Formagasket #2 worked the best on them..it stays tacky...ok so I used this on ALL the threads of every bolt..more heavily on the water jackets..and torqued all the bolts to about 70ft/lbs....
is this enough??? im reading ppl take theres to like 80?!! but i was told to follow arps intructions..but im not using their moly shiit anyway so..i would assume the formagasket is the same basic 'Kiss Me''Kiss Me''Kiss Me''Kiss Me' so is 70 lbs enough?

IF it needs to be more is it ok to torque them more with my rockers and pushrods all set already? i just preload the lifters and primed it today?
 

latham83

New Member
Jul 24, 2003
496
0
0
Feb 21, 2004
#2
  • Feb 21, 2004
  • #2
???
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Feb 21, 2004
#3
  • Feb 21, 2004
  • #3
You'll probably be fine. It won't hurt to back them off slightly one by one, and pull them up to 75-80 if you want to. You'll have to back them off a bit in order to over come the starting friction to get them turning and not exceed the torque you're trying to set. By the way, the ARP moly thread sealer doesn't set up - stays pliable; it's the best I've ever used. Next time, try it. It significantly reduces the friction of the threads so the clamping force can be achieved at much lower torques.
 

SwAmPf0x

Founding Member
Dec 29, 2001
1,423
0
37
Hell Hole Swamp
Feb 22, 2004
#4
  • Feb 22, 2004
  • #4
The torque spec depends on 2 things...the fastener you use and the lubricant/sealer you use, since your not using their stuff you'll just have to guess on the spec now, I ran into this when I bought my ARP's also, thats why I told you to buy their lube/sealer in your other thread...good luck
 

latham83

New Member
Jul 24, 2003
496
0
0
Feb 22, 2004
#5
  • Feb 22, 2004
  • #5
yeeea i know but i read an article on someone that installs heads all the time and said that formagasket number 2 was the best he ever tried out of like how many...so i wanted to use that...i mean 70 lbs seems like a decent amount i mean its not gonna blow a head gasket for 10 more lbs is it?? the top bolts dont need 10 more do they?? thast only if u use oil for them...?
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Feb 22, 2004
#6
  • Feb 22, 2004
  • #6
Like I said, if you got good clean pulls up to 70, and the pattern is correct, you'll probably be ok. But here's the deal - we don't know what impact the thread sealer you used has on the torque values - there's no way around that. That's why I try to use what they recommend, then I know what I'm dealing with. I can't believe that 'formagasket number 2', whatever that is, is gonna be a better lubricant for the threads than oil or moly lube. But I'm guessing at that. If it's a worse lubricant - that is, it creates more friction, not less, then you'd need MORE torque than spec to achieve the proper clamping force, not less. I looked at my ARP spec sheet and they called for 85 ft-lbs. on cast iron heads lubed with oil/70 ft-lbs. for cast iron lubed wiht moly/60 ft-lbs. for aluminum heads lubed with moly. You've got 70 ft-lbs. on cast iron lubed with who-knows-what. So you see - it's all a big guess. If you're worried enough about it to post, then I'd go back and put some more torque on them. But you seem to be trying to talk us into leaving it the way it is. If that's what you want to do, go for it.
 

SwAmPf0x

Founding Member
Dec 29, 2001
1,423
0
37
Hell Hole Swamp
Feb 22, 2004
#7
  • Feb 22, 2004
  • #7
The theory on the top bolts needing 10 more ft/lbs is to compensate for the lower intake being bolted to the head and pulling up, I just followed ARP's directions and didnt have any problems, 65 ft/lbs all the way around

I would GUESS you would need more torque using permetex, I'll let you decide how much more
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Feb 22, 2004
#8
  • Feb 22, 2004
  • #8
SwampFox - yeah, my ARP torque spec guide makes no mention of different torque values for the different length bolts - go figure. I used the ARP moly-thread sealer and torqued my alum. heads to 65; it's been fine.
 

latham83

New Member
Jul 24, 2003
496
0
0
Feb 22, 2004
#9
  • Feb 22, 2004
  • #9
ok i understand what you guys are talking about...is it OK though to go ahead and torque my arp's to 5 or 10 more pounds after i just preloaded the lifters, rockers and primed it? I didn't want to mess that up ya know...i would assume its ok?
hey arp's arnt torque to yield are they?
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Feb 22, 2004
#10
  • Feb 22, 2004
  • #10
Seems like you want your cake and eat it too; if you're worried about the torques, torque on, and then recheck your rockers - although I doubt they'll change. If you don't want to recheck the rockers, then go ahead and crank it up. You're gonna have to make a choice - you can't have it both ways. Oh, ARP's aren't torque to yield - so you don't have to worry about that. ARP tells me they design those 5.0L head bolts to be at about 75% of yield when they are torqued to their spec.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved Noisy Valvetrain
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jun 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 19, 2024
PonyGTrider
B
water pump installation questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
General karthief
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
677
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Drivetrain Clutch cable?
  • flashback87
  • Jul 14, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
43
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 29, 2024
Noobz347
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
577
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?