• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

B cam ok with GT40p's?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stang2841
  • Start date Start date Dec 22, 2004
S

stang2841

New Member
Jun 12, 2004
708
0
0
palm harbor florida
Dec 22, 2004
#1
  • Dec 22, 2004
  • #1
well I got some used GT40p's hear and I'm gona be sendin them off to get worked...


that being said, is there any off the shelf cams besides the B cam with 1.7 rockers that would do better with this combo?

I heard the B cam with 1.7 rockers would be a pretty good match with this combo plus its cheap... and sounds realy nice...


any crane or comp cams that might work better?
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 22, 2004
#2
  • Dec 22, 2004
  • #2
Keep in mind your shorties may not work with the P's - the spark plug angle is different. Be sure you try them to see - most headers you can't get several of the spark plugs out because of interference with the header. Many also have problems with spark plug wires/boots burning because they're so close to the header. Ford Racing's new shorties will work with the P heads.

I would suggest looking at CompCams XE line - much more contemporary designs than the B....whatever you do, have the springs upgraded.
 
S

stang2841

New Member
Jun 12, 2004
708
0
0
palm harbor florida
Dec 22, 2004
#3
  • Dec 22, 2004
  • #3
I'm just gona get mac long tubes, and I'm getting the whole thing worked, so springs are defintely on the list...
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 22, 2004
#4
  • Dec 22, 2004
  • #4
Long tubes are better for sure - will the Mac long tubes clear the plugs on the P's?
 
S

stang2841

New Member
Jun 12, 2004
708
0
0
palm harbor florida
Dec 22, 2004
#5
  • Dec 22, 2004
  • #5
I believe so, thats what everybody has told me so far..

and I got a friend running them on his P's
 
W

wild50gt

Member
May 14, 2004
51
0
6
nj
Dec 23, 2004
#6
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #6
no they wont clear, i was eating the passenger rear cylinder spark plug boot every other week with my MAC Lt's and P heads. i ran the same exact setup you are thinking about doing for years, ported P's, 1.7 and B cam. this was years ago, just recently i switched to a more up to date setup.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 23, 2004
#7
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #7
Here's the thing to be careful of - there are lots of folks out there who bolt them up, and the claim "they fit" --- but they've never actually tried to change the plugs.
 

jaidedeye

Member
Apr 4, 2004
627
0
16
Goldsboro nc
Dec 23, 2004
#8
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #8
i have regular gt-40 iron heads ported all to hell with an F cam and 1.7 roller rockers. i built my motor to someday go forced induction(blower or turbo for noobs) but i must say that my combo runs awsome in N/A trim. id go for the f cam over the b cam anyday. as long as you have the clearance for it.....the f cam with 1.7''s has about .540 lift....
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Dec 23, 2004
#9
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #9
I had the B cam on 1.7's but on a set of thumpers. Recently sold the B and 1.7's but I can tell you that it was a good setup. There are better cam's out there than the B cam, but the price is nice.
 

Funanin

Founding Member
Nov 26, 2001
356
0
0
Horsham, Pennsylvania
Dec 23, 2004
#10
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #10
anyone know if there is spark plug clearance issues with the GT-40 aluminum turbo swirl heads? I havent put mine on yet, and i have a pair of bbk equal shorties to go with them but everyone says that if u have P heads u need the FMS headers... will I need them or is the turbo swirl a different design than the P head?
 

jaidedeye

Member
Apr 4, 2004
627
0
16
Goldsboro nc
Dec 23, 2004
#11
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #11
no issues, they are the same as regular gt-40 irons
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 23, 2004
#12
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #12
The turbo swirl head is a different design than the P (chamber) -- but I've never heard of any spark plug issues with them. I have them on mine - no plug issues.

jaidedeye - peak lift has absolutely nothing to do with p to v clearance.....
 
S

stang2841

New Member
Jun 12, 2004
708
0
0
palm harbor florida
Dec 23, 2004
#13
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #13
Yount got to me before I did..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
753
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Resolved Fixing a GT40P Valvetrain nightmare
  • foxbodyclark
  • May 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
999
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 24, 2025
limp
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
545
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
816
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?