• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Back from the transmission shop!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blown_Fox
  • Start date Start date Jun 23, 2004
B

Blown_Fox

New Member
Jun 18, 2004
13
0
0
North Dakota
Jun 23, 2004
#1
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #1
The ol' Fox is getting new front and rear main seals, long tube headers, h-pipe, catback exhaust, tranny overhaul, shift kit, stall convertor and Ford Racing 3:73 gears. That thing is gonna be alive when it comes back from the shop considering the previous setup was a bone stock 90 GT AOD with 2:73's.
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Jun 23, 2004
#2
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #2
3.73's in an auto??? man 4.10's really make an aod wake up, i love mine
 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
Jun 23, 2004
#3
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #3
3.73's are still a fine choice, but 4.10 are the best for an auto setup (mind you your gas mileage suffers ) But you will still be pleased with them over the 2.73's no doubt.
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Jun 23, 2004
#4
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #4
i only lost 1-3 mpg
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Jun 23, 2004
#5
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #5
people tend to go too aggressive on the gears to make up for a lack of engine. 3.73's will be great, and you'll still enjoy some highway action too.
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Jun 23, 2004
#6
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #6
uh v8only excuse me but are you trying to tell me that the majority of people who put 4.10 in an automatic are "too aggressive". kinda sounds like a crock of crap to me
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Jun 23, 2004
#7
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #7
WantaGT said:
uh v8only excuse me but are you trying to tell me that the majority of people who put 4.10 in an automatic are "too aggressive". kinda sounds like a crock of crap to me
Click to expand...

no, hes just saying you dont really need 4.10s if you have enough power.
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Jun 23, 2004
#8
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #8
the way first gear is in an aod 4.10s are optimal
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Jun 23, 2004
#9
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #9
yes that's exactly what I'm telling you.

I have 3.73's in my 5 speed stang, and I like them because I don't do much highway travel anymore, but truthefully, they're too much. People have a tendency to put WAY too much gear in their cars. WHY?? because gears have such a drastic difference in quarter mile times and seat of the pants feel. Gears are NOT a replacement for real power adders such as heads/cam/intake and forced induction.

Truthefully, I miss the days of being able to go 80-85 mph and only be spinning 2k rpms, drop it into 4th, and slam the accelerator.

now I'm spinning 2500 rpms+ just to go freaking 70 or so. the car is a complete blast on the street, but driving on the freeway is now a chore. the 5.0 engine's sweet spot for cruising is 2000 rpms, and gears shove that way up closer to 3k on the freeway.

people imo are better off being slightly more conservative on the gear, and investing more into the actual engine so that they can enjoy their car more on the freeway.

The only reason I bring this up is because gears are a big $ investment. I really used to enjoy the freeway, and now my mustang is limited to speeds of 70 mph or so unless I want to tax the hell out of the engine.
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Jun 23, 2004
#10
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #10
do you have an aod with 4.10's? dude i only spin like 2400 on the free way
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Jun 23, 2004
#11
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #11
an aod with 4.10s is about the same as a 5 speed with 3.73's (from what I understand)

2400 rpms isn't bad, but I bet that is speeds slower than 75. 2400 rpm still makes the car feel "uncomfortable" as the sweet spot is right at 2100 rpms (the drone)

it's not really as big a deal as I'm making it sound, and truthefully we should never be driving faster than 75 anyhow right???

just don't expect to be able to drop it into 4th when your doing 75-80 and a honda try's to prove himself to you. On a flip note, it's probably not super safe to kick it out of od at 80 with 4.10's
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Jun 23, 2004
#12
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #12
only if you wanna scatter a real expensive piece of equipment lol sorry if i can off jerk-like i'm just in a bad mood right now
 

RydeOn

Licensed to Chill
Founding Member
Sep 26, 2000
6,273
1
77
orange county, CA
Jun 23, 2004
#13
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #13
I agree with v8only and Ive had that mentality all along. Now that I have my blower I have no need for 3.73's on my T5. My car hauls off the line, from a roll, top end (simply drop into 4th), whatever you want. Crusing is way chill too. Judging by the guys name, Blown Fox, I'd say the 3.73s on his auto will be just fine.
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Jun 23, 2004
#14
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #14
don't mind me either, I love debating and pushing peoples buttons

the only reason I brought this up actually because I am low budget (spend money on family) and have a bone stock long block with 186k miles.

after I put in my 3.73 gears, I have enough torque to drag california off the map, and now I REALLY realize how seriously my horespower is lacking, as it just quits making power up top in comparison to how fast the gears get the car going. I've also been fusterated a couple of times on the freeway when people hit me up, and I can no longer downshift to play.
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Jun 23, 2004
#15
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #15
see the majority of my driving is not freeway so i'm always in the powerband. it's awesome to hit it from like 1500 rpm or so and just pin you in the seat.
 

RydeOn

Licensed to Chill
Founding Member
Sep 26, 2000
6,273
1
77
orange county, CA
Jun 23, 2004
#16
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #16
by the way Blown Fox, your car is going to be drastically different. You wont recongize it. I cant wait to hear about those results.
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
Jun 23, 2004
#17
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #17
v8only said:
I have 3.73's in my 5 speed stang, and I like them because I don't do much highway travel anymore, but truthefully, they're too much. People have a tendency to put WAY too much gear in their cars. WHY?? because gears have such a drastic difference in quarter mile times and seat of the pants feel. Gears are NOT a replacement for real power adders such as heads/cam/intake and forced induction.
Click to expand...

I think you're approaching this wrong with your thinking. Gears should be matched to what the car is for. So if yours is for just cruising around, then maybe those are too much for you. If it's for a 1/4 mile car, then there's no need to consider what the engine will be running at while crusing on the highway at 75. Obviously if it's somewhere in the middle, you have to decide. So just because someone has more gear than you, doesn't mean they're "wrong" or their car setup doesn't work as well.
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Jun 23, 2004
#18
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #18
you're absolutely correct, and truthefully I'm gonna keep my gears unless I go blown someday.

the only thing I'm combatting is the typical "get 4.10's or get 3.73's" mentality. I see a million "what gear" questions and 9 out of 10 people will suggest the steepest possible gear, followed by a "I don't mind 2600 rpm on the freeway" without ever stopping to ask what the intended setup is.

in the original posters post, it appears he is blown, for that reason he shouldn't really go beyond the 3.73's, yet the first thing everyone said is how crazy he was for not doing the 4.10's
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Jun 23, 2004
#19
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #19
never called him crazy...
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
Jun 23, 2004
#20
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #20
v8only said:
you're absolutely correct, and truthefully I'm gonna keep my gears unless I go blown someday.

the only thing I'm combatting is the typical "get 4.10's or get 3.73's" mentality. I see a million "what gear" questions and 9 out of 10 people will suggest the steepest possible gear, followed by a "I don't mind 2600 rpm on the freeway" without ever stopping to ask what the intended setup is.

in the original posters post, it appears he is blown, for that reason he shouldn't really go beyond the 3.73's, yet the first thing everyone said is how crazy he was for not doing the 4.10's
Click to expand...

I agree with not generalizing answers -- and for that reason, the first response should have been a question asking "What the heck are you planning on doing with this car and what kind of setup do you have now???" -- instead of just opinions.

Even a blower car can run some serious gears if the setup is right and needs them -- it all falls back on that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
287
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
H
New kid on the block
  • HydraX
  • Mar 22, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
17
Views
700
The Welcome Wagon Mar 22, 2025
HydraX
H
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
P
Loud awful sound
  • Pspangler37
  • Jul 30, 2023
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 31, 2023
Pspangler37
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?