• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

BBK vs FRPP shorty headers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Psydwaze
  • Start date Start date May 14, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
B

Biggeley

New Member
Mar 4, 2003
136
0
0
May 16, 2005
#21
  • May 16, 2005
  • #21
I had both a set of FRPP headers and BBK shorty headers.. Actually the workmanship on the BBKs was better -- a lot less welding slag in the port-to-flange mating area. Plus where the primary tubes were mated better to the collector. Also, the flanges on the BBKs were thicker...

The only advantage the FRPP headers had over the BBKs were that they were made of stainless steel. They should last a lot longer.

It could have just been a bad set of FRPP headers -- I don't know. But based on my experience I would chose the BBK over the FRPP. But I ended up returning both of them and went with a set of MAC longtube headers. And believe it not -- the MACs were put together better at the collectors and flanges than either header.
 
G

Guyfoxbody

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
73
0
0
May 16, 2005
#22
  • May 16, 2005
  • #22
BBk are OK. I took mine back because of welding flash in the stud holes. The stud would not screw in. You would think they would clean them up before shipping but

I went with the FRPP Shorties. No problems at all!
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
May 16, 2005
#23
  • May 16, 2005
  • #23
You know what's funny, fairway ford, yorba linda, ca at the sport and rv performance section (frpp section) they adamentaly swear against the frpp headers, saying they are poorly made junk. They won't stock them, and EVERY time I've called, or my brother, or friends inquiring, they say to EVERYONE, oh those are junk, get the bassasani headers. I got pissed off at them one day, and asked what the hell is with that, and they simply said that a majority of the frpp headers they pulled straight out of the box were junk and had to be sent back for one reason or another, bad welds, etc. Very strange. I've ALWAYS heard the frpp headers were some of the best, that's why I ordered them
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
May 16, 2005
#24
  • May 16, 2005
  • #24
Don't ever buy a header with individual header flanges like the MAC headers have. Went in the first time fine, but the next time I needed a breaker bar and a friend to pull on it to line up the header bolt holes while I tried to put the bolts in. grrrrrrrr...... The heating and cooling caused them to distort.

My next headers will most likely be BBK or FRPP. One piece flange.
 

50bomber

New Member
Aug 30, 2004
116
0
0
Galvatraz, TX
May 16, 2005
#25
  • May 16, 2005
  • #25
Hmmmm to defend my "exhaust guy"=Jimmy LaRocca (you guys know him right? ), he has one price for FRPP shorties and all others with one piece flange and like double that for any garbage that MAC makes, since they "don't fit, new, or old, or even and they are garbage" They do make good copper header gaskets, 1 year no leaks .
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
May 17, 2005
#26
  • May 17, 2005
  • #26
50bomber said:
Hmmmm to defend my "exhaust guy"=Jimmy LaRocca (you guys know him right? ), he has one price for FRPP shorties and all others with one piece flange and like double that for any garbage that MAC makes, since they "don't fit, new, or old, or even and they are garbage" They do make good copper header gaskets, 1 year no leaks .
Click to expand...

1.) Why did you need to drop a name? Do you feel special because you bought from a well known Mustang guy?

2.) It's not an attack on MAC, it's the truth. I known at least 5 guys with the same experience I had.

3.) Copper gaskets are band aid fix to bigger problem. Namely, poorly made headers.

Quality headers don't leak. Sorry to highjack the thread for a bit.

But I still say either FRPP or BBk is good. I'd probably buy the BBK. My brother has BBK long tubes on a V8 Ranger he's building and they are nice quality.
 

stang_racer69

Giddy Up My Ass!
Founding Member
Jan 1, 1999
1,960
0
0
Centeral Ohio
May 17, 2005
#27
  • May 17, 2005
  • #27
I picked up a set of motorsport headers a few years ago for $100, they are not the coated headers but neverless I couldn't pass up the deal. The fit perfect and hope when I remove them they fit just as good going back on. The only thing I dislike about them is that they have a coating of surface rust on them
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
428
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
M
My numbers sound right?
  • MiltP
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
795
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2026
MiltP
M
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
278
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
C
Dyno day! # guesses?
  • clayton seiders
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
439
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Scrapla347
Custom tune?
  • Nostang25
  • Jul 13, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
612
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 17, 2025
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?