• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

beware of the v6f-bodies.....haha

  • Thread starter Thread starter p.exeter_bleu
  • Start date Start date Feb 18, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
H

hiattwl

New Member
Jun 9, 2003
145
0
0
41
Cullowhee, and Andrews NC
Feb 27, 2004
#21
  • Feb 27, 2004
  • #21
[QUOTE='66 coupe]They're obviously a bunch of dumbasses.

One guy in there is talking some crap about how a s/c SS Camaro should be able to kill an '03 Cobra. But the damn cars cost about the same amount of money stock. If you want to be fair just get a Mach I, supercharge it and beat the hell out of the SS and the Cobra, then pocket the rest of the money.
Besides, I'd like to see an '04 Mach go up against an '04 SS....OH YEA!!!...Dumbasses.

My friend has a '99 V6 Camaro. I'll admit they look good on the outside and the T-top option is nice, but the interiors are just plain awful. Not only do they feel cheap, but they're also hideous. I've never raced him, so I can't help you out with the speed thing. They FEEL about the same, but I'd still rather have my Mustang if it is slower. I mean both being V6's you're not really looking for the fastest times if you buy either.[/QUOTE]

Am i mistaken or were'nt the F bodies phased out in 02, that was the last production year.

Wayne
 
H

hiattwl

New Member
Jun 9, 2003
145
0
0
41
Cullowhee, and Andrews NC
Feb 27, 2004
#22
  • Feb 27, 2004
  • #22
hiattwl said:
Am i mistaken or were'nt the F bodies phased out in 02, that was the last production year.

Wayne
Click to expand...

my bad, answered above, lol, i'm drunk and tired
 

'03 6-Speed

New Member
May 23, 2003
216
0
0
41
Panhandle O' Texas
Feb 27, 2004
#23
  • Feb 27, 2004
  • #23
Ford is proof positive that you don't have to have mind boggling amounts of horsepower (SS Camaro) to outsell the competition (Camaros in general) WOOT WOOT! give it up for Ford for designing a better, though slower car that sold tons more than the camaro could have ever dreamed of selling. Oh, and even with the added suspension parts from the factory, those camaros (93+) don't handle worth a crap. The last year they had a good handling suspension was in the 3rd Gens (82-92). After that they just thought, more parts, equals better suspension, they were hella wrong.
 

AP1995V6

Member
Jul 13, 2003
547
1
16
41
Oxford, MS
Feb 28, 2004
#24
  • Feb 28, 2004
  • #24
Any car that I don't bang my knees on the dash when I get in has grade-A interior IMO I drive my mom's '98 corolla every now and then, and well, it's a good thing im not claustrophobic
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Progress Thread Haven't posted in a looong time... rescuing another 'stang... '89 Vert
  • ChillPhatCat
  • May 20, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 1, 2023
joeballz83
J
Once and For All.....Door to Body Weather Stripping Shootout
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Oct 3, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 5 6 7
Replies
128
Views
39K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2023
rednotch
Old H/c/i Installation Explanation And Pics
  • FastDriver
  • Jan 26, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 27, 2018
FastDriver
  • Locked
Just Some Suggestion's For Foxes
  • Detroiit
  • Jul 24, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2014
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?