• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

BFG DRs vs ET Streets...

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveB
  • Start date Start date Feb 16, 2004
D

DaveB

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
637
0
0
Middlesex and Pomona, NJ
Feb 16, 2004
#1
  • Feb 16, 2004
  • #1
Whats up guys, last week I bent 2 of my factory 16" wheels after hitting some potholes. Now those were my winter wheels, so it just forced me to put my 2003 Cobra wheels back on (which I didn't mind at all, car looks soooo much better with them on ).

Now Im trying to figure out what to do with the remaining two good wheels. I've decided that I either want to put on 26 x 10.50-16 ET Streets or 255/50R16 BFG DRs. Now I figure that the ET Streets would hook better, but will I have to worry about them with my stock T5 ? Thats the main thing that I am concerned about.

I see many people with slicks listed in their list of mods and many times without a new transmission such as a Tremec. But should I take the risk of breaking my transmission? This car is my daily driver BTW. I figure I should be pretty safe with a pair of Drag Radials. What does everyone else think? Also whats everyone's best 60' with ET Streets or 16" DRs on a stock suspension? Thanks.
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Feb 16, 2004
#2
  • Feb 16, 2004
  • #2
Get the ET streets for sure.

The tire kind doesnt really matter when it comes to busting the T-5. Its all about the 60ft times you pull. If your pulling 1.6 60ft's on nittos, the t-5 will bust sooner or later. Of course the ET street will hook much better, allowing a more consistant 60ft.

Some people have luck with there T-5's. I think since your car is a vert, and prob weighs quite a bit, the t5 will go quickly. Most people seem to bust there t5 on the 2nd-3rd shift, if you take it easy there (no power shift) it may last a while, but who knows.

My best 60ft time is a 1.705, that is on 17" nittos, with solid lower control arms, 50/50 lakewood drag shocks, and no front sway bar. No other suspension mods.
 
D

DaveB

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
637
0
0
Middlesex and Pomona, NJ
Feb 16, 2004
#3
  • Feb 16, 2004
  • #3
My car weighs 3780 with me and a 1/4 tank of gas w/o the spare and jack. This was at Englishtown's scale. Also, I never powershift. And that was before the rollbar .
 
N

Nobody

Founding Member
May 9, 2000
2,515
0
0
Kenmore, WA
Feb 17, 2004
#4
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #4
I had that exact same choice to make and I went with the DR's.

Here's why:

The E.T. Streets are bias ply tires and don't have the sidewall strength as radials do. You will feel a lot more sway in the rear at 90+ mph. It's a little scarey to get used to at first. Also, slicks will give you a lot more traction but this traction will break stock parts eventually. A lot of tracks require you to have a driveshaft safety loop installed if you run slicks. With DR's you don't need this.
 

Joe 5.0

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2002
1,184
2
38
Macomb, MI (metro detroit)
Feb 17, 2004
#5
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #5
I am going to put ET Streets on mine. I have 315 DR's and I still spin at the track, but the BFG's are supposedly better than my Nitto's. Sooner or later the T5 is gonna go, might as well pull some good times while it is still moving under its own power, right?
 
N

Nobody

Founding Member
May 9, 2000
2,515
0
0
Kenmore, WA
Feb 17, 2004
#6
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #6
Totally man! My buddy is getting 1.6 60' times with slicks and his totally stock T5 & 8.8.
 

fastfive0

"Your girl likes my stang better"
Founding Member
Mar 1, 1999
1,462
0
36
Wilkes-Barre,Pa
Feb 17, 2004
#7
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #7
315 size BFG drags and you spin @ the track with 200hp??????? Something is wayyyy wrong there. Air them down and heat em up you should have NO spinning with that much meat for that little of HP. I run 245/40/18's BFG DR's and with double your HP and can still walk it out of the hole with minimal spinnage.
 

Big Jay

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
130
0
0
Tucson, Az.
Feb 17, 2004
#8
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #8
I ran a lot 1.6 with a stock clutch and t-5. It was when I started to run 118+ that i swapped trannies. I sold mine for $500 w/ bellhousing and flywheel to a guy doing a swap. Saved me $500 on the TREMEC.
 

GTPhreak

Founding Member
Mar 16, 2000
5,505
0
77
Rowlett, TEXAS
Feb 17, 2004
#9
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #9
Don't bother with streets, get the drags
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Feb 17, 2004
#10
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #10
MM&FF did a test of both of these tires a few months ago and the BFG's came up one one-hundreth (0.01) short of the ET streets in the 60 foot test. There were some inconsistencies in the test that MM&FF noted which gave the ET streets a slight advantage. I would go with the BFG's because of the extra stability they offer on the street for driving to and from the track.

Joe
 

95GTvert[bv12]

Founding Member
Apr 1, 2001
1,792
0
37
Lake Tahoe, NV
Feb 17, 2004
#11
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #11
i would go with the BFG's as well, also don't go to big if you put 315's on there you going to add more weight and more roatating mass which can kill your times, a thick sidewall is more importang then the width of the tire so your 16's with 245's are going to have a better foot print then 17's with 245's.

Also driver skill has alot to do with it you just can't expect 1.8 60ft times just becuase you have DR....look at my 60ft times....i can't launch worth crap and with DR's or ET's i bet I still couldn't get a 2.0 60ft time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
SN95 Another Coyote swap list
  • catkiller
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
94
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
catkiller
C
2
Electrical mayhem
  • 2000ElectricGreen
  • Mar 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
218
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
2000ElectricGreen
2
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
728
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
839
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?