• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Bigger injectors, hot start issues....

  • Thread starter Thread starter CManT1914
  • Start date Start date Nov 14, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 15, 2005
#21
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #21
OK Chris

I told you I'd get that info and I really had to dig for it.

I decided to not pm you with it because the other members may get some benefit from this stuff.

Before I start, I wanna say this stuff is from a Tweecer & EEC Tuner perspective.

Three fixed parameters in the pcm fuel tables come into play when talking about startup.

1) Time
2) Load
3) ECT

We are dealing with two fuel tables.

1) fuel_table_base_OL
2) fuel_table_startup_OL

The base table is where you see the commanded ratio and it is used during warm up conditions.

The startup table is where you see values that are subtracted from the base table to give you a fatter ratio and time comes into play here.

You asked about hot start conditions so lets use that as an example.

btw, we're gonna use an unmodified j4j1 file for our little example.

Say you've been driving around and go in the house for a while and decide to go somewhere else. When you start the car for the second time, the ECT is 180*

Most NA h/c/i combos will idle at a load of say about .20 to .30 so we will use that load factor.

Looking at the base table you see the pcm is commanding a ratio of 14.302 at that load value and ECT.

Looking at the startup table in the 180* temp column at 0 to 6 seconds you see the value of 1.716. Notice as the time increases, the value decreases until finally at 40 seconds, the values in the table are no longer used.

Here are the commanded, startup, and final ratio values

00-06 secs cmd 14.302 startup 1.716 final ratio of 12.586
07-10 secs cmd 14.302 startup 1.487 final ratio of 12.815
11-20 secs cmd 14.302 startup 1.259 final ratio of 13.043
21-40 secs cmd 14.302 startup 0.572 final ratio of 13.73

At this point in time, you most likely go from Open Loop to Closed Loop conditions and the O2's are calling the shots to achieve the pcm's goal of 14.7 CL happiness.

The Fix is to go to the 210 & 240 ECT columns in the startup table and zero out those entire columns. If need be, you could always play with the values in the 180* column as well.

This topic of discussion makes me wanna ask you guys this ................

What do ya'll think might happen if you start a pull after a cool down at ...... lets say about 20 seconds after you fire it up?

hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!

That info would be another thread

Grady
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Nov 15, 2005
#22
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #22
Grady, that all makes sense except for one thing.........

Here are the commanded, startup, and final ratio values

00-06 secs cmd 14.302 startup 1.716 final ratio of 12.586
07-10 secs cmd 14.302 startup 1.487 final ratio of 12.815
11-20 secs cmd 14.302 startup 1.259 final ratio of 13.043
21-40 secs cmd 14.302 stattup 0.572 final ratio of 13.73
Click to expand...

How do you get to the final ratios of 12.586, 12.815 etc.?? I tried dividing 14.302 by 1.716, then multiplying it, but I couldn't come up with the final ratios. Did I miss something in your post?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 15, 2005
#23
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #23
CManT1914 said:
Grady, that all makes sense except for one thing.........



How do you get to the final ratios of 12.586, 12.815 etc.?? I tried dividing 14.302 by 1.716, then multiplying it, but I couldn't come up with the final ratios. Did I miss something in your post?
Click to expand...

Well Chris

I did say "IIRC" in the earlier part of this thread and .........

I did NOT recall correctly

I'm just gettin kinda absent minded these days.

The info is as it is in the last post.

Does it make sense now?

Did you think about my little brain teaser?

Grady
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Nov 15, 2005
#24
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #24
final5-0 said:
Well Chris

I did say "IIRC" in the earlier part of this thread and .........

I did NOT recall correctly

I'm just gettin kinda absent minded these days.

The info is as it is in the last post.

Does it make sense now?

Did you think about my little brain teaser?

Grady
Click to expand...

lol, I think I missed the point of your brain teaser. BUT!!!............ I had MAJOR success in tuning out some low load/low rpm bucking earlier. I'm making a new thread about it to hopefully help some other cammed guys out.

I did change the tables up for the cranking issues, but have not had the chance to do a hot start yet. I will tomorrow though. Thanks a ton for digging that information up Grady! I owe you 1 (more like 4254235 now, lol).
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 15, 2005
#25
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #25
CManT1914 said:
lol, I think I missed the point of your brain teaser. BUT!!!............ I had MAJOR success in tuning out some low load/low rpm bucking earlier. I'm making a new thread about it to hopefully help some other cammed guys out.

I did change the tables up for the cranking issues, but have not had the chance to do a hot start yet. I will tomorrow though. Thanks a ton for digging that information up Grady! I owe you 1 (more like 4254235 now, lol).
Click to expand...

Well now!

I stumped you on that little thought provoking question you say

Maybe somebody else can see how my little Q could cause a big prob while at the dyno.

Better watch out Chris or JT will slip on in here ... right here ... in your very own thread and make you loose face as they say in the east

I'm glad the info was able to help you

Grady
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Nov 16, 2005
#26
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #26
final5-0 said:
Well now!

I stumped you on that little thought provoking question you say

Maybe somebody else can see how my little Q could cause a big prob while at the dyno.

Better watch out Chris or JT will slip on in here ... right here ... in your very own thread and make you loose face as they say in the east

I'm glad the info was able to help you

Grady
Click to expand...

Oh you mean the question in a previous post? About the dyno run? Well I would have to think you would still be running a little richer due to startup fuel multiplication, but I really still have no idea, lol.

I made a new thread about the bucking issues, I know a lot of guys were having problems with it lately, hopefully they'll see it.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 16, 2005
#27
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #27
CManT1914 said:
Oh you mean the question in a previous post? About the dyno run? Well I would have to think you would still be running a little richer due to startup fuel multiplication, but I really still have no idea, lol.
Click to expand...

BINGO!

Give the man a Cigar

Remember that little fact the next time you go to the dyno.

Grady
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Nov 16, 2005
#28
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #28
final5-0 said:
BINGO!

Give the man a Cigar

Remember that little fact the next time you go to the dyno.

Grady
Click to expand...

 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 16, 2005
#29
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #29
95cobradude said:
i cant for the life of me understand why anybody would put a bigger than stock injector in a car, drive it without a tune, and then complain about driveabiity, idle, and starting problems.
Click to expand...

Very simple...not everyone has the means to get a tune.

I say 24lbers are better for my car without a tune and 30lb injectors with a tune. When did I say I was complaining...I posted what happens. My car runs fine...just runs rich. I get good mpg...
 

from6to8

There's suction so I used that end O_O
15 Year Member
Sep 2, 2012
1,896
142
94
Jun 25, 2024
#30
  • Jun 25, 2024
  • #30
Chris tuten?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Help with a 95 5L crank no start
  • TheBubbaJoe
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
452
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
AeroCoupe
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
999
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
8
Electrical Crank-no start ... no spark ... no injector pulse, was it something I did? (redux)
  • 85gtCOBRA
  • Oct 28, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
571
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 29, 2025
85gtCOBRA
8
Electrical 88 EEC Injectors batch firing ?
  • Dustin 86GT
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
440
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 8, 2026
gkomo
L
1997 V6 Starting issue
  • leanzik04
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
250
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Mar 20, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?