• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Billet or Aluminum Flywheel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter coolblue65
  • Start date Start date Mar 30, 2007

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Mar 30, 2007
#1
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #1
As I am currently planning a new motor (347), I am trying to make some final decisions on parts.

I have been looing at flywheels and it looks like a Ford Racing Billet Steel flywheel is around $245 shipped and SFI approved, and a Fidanza aluminum is $283 shipped but not SFI approved. Because they are close so price won't play to much in the decision.

The aluminum only weighs 13.5lbs and the billet weighs around 25lbs, obviously that is a big difference. However I am not sure how this will affect my day to day driving, HP, etc. etc.

Is anyone running an aluminum flywheel now or has any experience with them? I have heard a lot of mixed reviews and need some help deciding.

Thanx!
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Mar 30, 2007
#2
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #2
The Fidanza aluminum should be SFI approved........that's what I have and it's SFI approved.

My Fidanza is no problem on the street with 3.50 gears and a 302 in a '68 Mustang. Seriously, it's not a drag car or anything, yet it's pretty easy to drive stoplight to stoplight.

EDIT: I forgot to mention that I also have a single plane intake and a 650. Both of those hurt the bottom end slightly, but my Crane is a high lift/low duration smog/blower cam that compensates somewhat. The engine usd to be in a 3300lb '89 GT with an iron flywheel and 2.73 gears and that wasn't hard to drive either. People with small gutless engines are going to see the biggest degradation in slow takeoffs. V8s have much larger and heavier rotating assemblies not to mention more low-end toque, so aluminum flywheels will hurt much less........IMO
 
R

RUSTYNUT

New Member
Mar 22, 2007
128
0
0
PDX
Mar 31, 2007
#3
  • Mar 31, 2007
  • #3
Steel is going to be better for an driver. Light flywheels are great for a moving car to accelerate faster. A few of my friends driving imports have had problems with the disimilar metals warping the fly wheel. They do drive the @#$% out of them.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Mar 31, 2007
#4
  • Mar 31, 2007
  • #4
A heavier flywheel tends to use weight to multiply torque, in effect.
A lighter flywheel revs much faster, but will lose low end torque.
Pretty much because it has less mass to 'bully' the rest of the driveline with.
I have heard folks complain about the really light flywheels being too touchy with throttle response. I can't imagine that myself...

I forgot to mention that I also have a single plane intake and a 650. Both of those hurt the bottom end slightly, but my Crane is a high lift/low duration smog/blower cam that compensates somewhat.
Click to expand...
Are you making the point that even with a single plane intake, you have no trouble street driving?
Or
Are you saying that the lighter flywheel would perform better with a torque friendly intake?

Just curious.

When you rev the engine in P or N, snap the throttle, does the engine come back to idle more quickly or less quickly than before?

I have always wondered that.
I would imagine that less rotating mass would bring it back to idle rpm much faster than a mass that tends to keep spinning because of centrifigal force.

Dave
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Mar 31, 2007
#5
  • Mar 31, 2007
  • #5
ratio411 said:
1.) Are you making the point that even with a single plane intake, you have no trouble street driving?
2.)Or Are you saying that the lighter flywheel would perform better with a torque friendly intake?

Just curious.

3.) When you rev the engine in P or N, snap the throttle, does the engine come back to idle more quickly or less quickly than before?

I have always wondered that.
I would imagine that less rotating mass would bring it back to idle rpm much faster than a mass that tends to keep spinning because of centrifigal force.

Dave
Click to expand...

1.) Yes
2.) Somewhat. The intake is just part of the bigger picture.
3.) Quicker up and down.

My point was that the more low-end torque you already have, the less difference an aluminum flywheel will make in street manners. Rear gears help a lot too. I wouldn't recommend one for a stock or heavily cammed engine with 3.00s.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Mar 31, 2007
#6
  • Mar 31, 2007
  • #6
65ShelbyClone said:
1.) Yes
2.) Somewhat. The intake is just part of the bigger picture.
3.) Quicker up and down.

My point was that the more low-end torque you already have, the less difference an aluminum flywheel will make in street manners. Rear gears help a lot too. I wouldn't recommend one for a stock or heavily cammed engine with 3.00s.
Click to expand...

Gotcha.
Makes sense.

I never considered the rear gears.
Should have though. If there is less mass to influence the driveline, then the driveline should have more lever (gear).

I have been considering aluminum flywheel for a while.
I ended up with a steel Hays unit only because I got a great deal on a 'new' one in the box.
I will get around to aluminum one day.
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Mar 31, 2007
#7
  • Mar 31, 2007
  • #7
Anybody ever seen a CART or IRL car leave the pits?

Notice they always do a burnout every time they drive out of the pitbox?

They don't do it because it's cool, they do it because they have to. The engeneers have removed all the rotating mass from the engine and if they slip the clutch out, the engine will stall.

I'm going to build a 331 here soon, and I'm going with a neutral balance ( 0 oz ) steel flywheel. Occasional street driving, mostly OT.
 

fasttback

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
471
0
0
Northern CA
Mar 31, 2007
#8
  • Mar 31, 2007
  • #8
I was thinking the same during my 352 (4.06x3.4 stroke) build. I went with a Aluminum Ram 164 tooth flywheel (weight about 15 pounds) in my '66 fastback. As I recall some comments were - it is suited more for a drag motor, and if you run it on the street you will need a high torque motor to offset the lost weight (inertia) of a steel one otherwise it might stumble off the line.

I love it. No problems off the line and shifting. Behind it I have a Toploader, Hays street/strip clutch, and a 9" with 3.50 gears.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Mar 31, 2007
#9
  • Mar 31, 2007
  • #9
CraigMBA said:
The engeneers have removed all the rotating mass from the engine...
Click to expand...

Probably have titainium and kevlar for internal parts, engine and tranny. And a true lightweight flywheel is more like 6-12 lbs, not middle weight like 15-16 lbs.
I am not sure that a 15# aluminum flywheel constitutes that kind of weight reduction.
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Mar 31, 2007
#10
  • Mar 31, 2007
  • #10
Lots of good info so far.

65ShelbyClone - As far as Fidanza being SFI approved, Summit's website's says its not approved and I can't find anything on their website saying if it is or is not.

I think I will end up going with the Aluminum, I think the 347 should have plenty of torque down low (especially compared to my current 289 setup) to compensate for the less rotating mass.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Mar 31, 2007
#11
  • Mar 31, 2007
  • #11
one more thing to consider for a street engine, besides rotating mass, is durability. the steel wheel will be more durable and thus more suitable for a street engine than the aluminum wheel will. if you do go with the aluminum wheel, make sure that it has a bronze or steel friction surface that is removable for when you go to replace the clutch. at 15lbs you wont notice a problem with launching the car on the street, as long as you have a 3.25 or lower gear(3.50-3.90 is ideal for the street with an overdrive).
 
B

badmustang

New Member
Mar 30, 2007
33
0
0
Mar 31, 2007
#12
  • Mar 31, 2007
  • #12
check this noise light flywheel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tbtTsbS_cQ&mode=related&search=
 
B

badmustang

New Member
Mar 30, 2007
33
0
0
Mar 31, 2007
#13
  • Mar 31, 2007
  • #13
noise of a heavy flywheel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbTdpxQLxUs&NR=1
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Mar 31, 2007
#14
  • Mar 31, 2007
  • #14
rbohm said:
one more thing to consider for a street engine, besides rotating mass, is durability. the steel wheel will be more durable and thus more suitable for a street engine than the aluminum wheel will. if you do go with the aluminum wheel, make sure that it has a bronze or steel friction surface that is removable for when you go to replace the clutch. at 15lbs you wont notice a problem with launching the car on the street, as long as you have a 3.25 or lower gear(3.50-3.90 is ideal for the street with an overdrive).
Click to expand...

I have thought about that, the Fidanza has a replacable/servicable steel friction surface.

As far as gearing I have 3.55's in back, and the first gear in my Tremec is a 3.27 so I think I have enough there.

Badmustang- I am not sure what I was listening for on those clips- two different cars with different motors and exhausts is what I saw/heard.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Mar 31, 2007
#15
  • Mar 31, 2007
  • #15
I think he was trying to illustrate the speed at which the rpms respond to throttle snaps on a steel wheel vs aluminum wheel.
The yellow Stang revs up and down much quicker than the long drawn out revs of the white one.
 
B

badmustang

New Member
Mar 30, 2007
33
0
0
Mar 31, 2007
#16
  • Mar 31, 2007
  • #16
ratio411 said:
I think he was trying to illustrate the speed at which the rpms respond to throttle snaps on a steel wheel vs aluminum wheel.
The yellow Stang revs up and down much quicker than the long drawn out revs of the white one.
Click to expand...

that's correct the yellow stang rev faster up and down light fywheel
and the other stang has a heavy flywheel..
i also had a heavy flywheel in my stang an have now a centerforce aluminium flywheel and i like the centerforce the soud of the engine i verry nice.
and it feels that the car lost 100 pound of weight after is change the flywheel

light flywheel is better for the enginge bearings
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Mar 31, 2007
#17
  • Mar 31, 2007
  • #17
coolblue65 said:
65ShelbyClone - As far as Fidanza being SFI approved, Summit's website's says its not approved and I can't find anything on their website saying if it is or is not.
Click to expand...

Go to Fidanza's catalog download page here. Dowload the catalog and you'll see that their flywheels and flexplates have the SFI seal. Mine does:



ratio411 said:
Probably have titainium and kevlar for internal parts, engine and tranny. And a true lightweight flywheel is more like 6-12 lbs, not middle weight like 15-16 lbs.
I am not sure that a 15# aluminum flywheel constitutes that kind of weight reduction.
Click to expand...

The CART engine analogy was more of an extreme example. The CART engines use steel cranks, proably titanium rods, and forged aluminum pistons. However, the "flywheel" isn't so much a flywheel as it something to bolt the 5-8" clutch onto. They also have a very short stroke coupled with big cylinder heads for lots of top-end power at the expense of a non-existent low-end. The clutches also bite like a mofo, so easy takeoffs would be hard anyway.

And yeah, a 15lb flywheel is lighter than the stock 25lb cast iron lump.
 

Attachments

  • 100_1024copy.webp
    39.9 KB · Views: 283

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Mar 31, 2007
#18
  • Mar 31, 2007
  • #18
65ShelbyClone said:
Go to Fidanza's catalog download page here. Dowload the catalog and you'll see that their flywheels and flexplates have the SFI seal. Mine does:
Click to expand...


Thanks, thats what I needed to see. They don't really make it obvious though!
 

fasttback

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
471
0
0
Northern CA
Mar 31, 2007
#19
  • Mar 31, 2007
  • #19
65ShelbyClone said:
And yeah, a 15lb flywheel is lighter than the stock 25lb cast iron lump.
Click to expand...

Agreed. - and it sure cut down on some weight from my Hays 33lb SFI steel one I use to have.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Mar 31, 2007
#20
  • Mar 31, 2007
  • #20
coolblue65 said:
Thanks, thats what I needed to see. They don't really make it obvious though!
Click to expand...

You'd think they would be eager to advertise SFI approval since it is an important selling point to some people.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Could not pass this up .. guess the AOD is out
  • mikestang63
  • Jun 1, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 7, 2024
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?