- Mar 30, 2005
- 388
- 0
- 0
Looking into 351 based centrifugal blower motor for the street and was wondering if it would be better to have a longer stroke (6.2" rod) or shorter stroke 5.4" rod. Would like to shift at 6500 with hydraulic roller.
man I been doing something wrong for the last 20 years thenGrn92LX said:Rod ratio is meaningless. Build the biggest engine you can afford. Bigger the engine, the less rpm's you need to make power.


dragnazz5.0 said:long rod motors have longer dwell time at tdc than short rod motors do, and they also have lower piston side load. its my understanding that you can take a longer rod and an piston with an offset wrist pin and greatly reduce side load, but im not 100 percent sure on that since its been awhile since ive looked at that stuff. i say build a long rod motor and get it done
edit: to the original poster rod length has nothing to do with stroke. didnt really know what you were asking since you mentioned stroke but than said something about different rod lengths.
vikingpower said:shorter rods can tolerate less octane because of less dwell time at TDC which is good for ****ty pump gas. But longer rods are easier on the pistons. Since you wanna run boost, go with the shorter rods
JK i'm with rick on this one, i think the shorter stroke would be better.Rick 91GT said:How much boost? Are you willing to buy custom pistons....
The long stroke motors are limited with shelf stock pistons when trying to get to a blower or pump gas friendly comp ratio.