Hey guys... im really stuck in the middle here. Im stuck between a Centri Supercharger and The kenne bell twin screw. Im going to want to keep my lumpy cam which starts making power at 3000. Now going with the centrifugal supercharger... The heads are mid-high rpm heads.. the Intake makes power at 4000 plus. Would this still be a pretty decent street motor? Now on the flip side.. the twin screw... im told creates full boost at 2000 rpm. Ive even heard of people having traction problems because of so much torque down low. I would be using the same mid-high rpm heads and the 3000 rpm cam. With a ported GT 40 lower intake. The only kits i can find a 6 psi kit... 6 psi isnt gona give much... is it? Just for future compatibility... incase i ever had a 500+ hp motor... would it be better to be running the centri or the twin screw? Would the twin screw be a restriction at that kind of power? Also with that kind of power couldnt i see detonation because the kenne bell is not intercooled?
One last question... Ive been considering the fact that some people have traction problems with the twin screw.. and i was thinking with the centri i would have a setup that wouldnt start screaming until about 3500-4000 rpms... the car would already be moving down the road pretty good...so it might not loose traction as easily... so would it actually be better to have the centri setup.. for traction reasons? ( Dunno if there is any truth to me thinking this.. someone please correct me if im wrong )
Thanks Guys!
:SNSign:
One last question... Ive been considering the fact that some people have traction problems with the twin screw.. and i was thinking with the centri i would have a setup that wouldnt start screaming until about 3500-4000 rpms... the car would already be moving down the road pretty good...so it might not loose traction as easily... so would it actually be better to have the centri setup.. for traction reasons? ( Dunno if there is any truth to me thinking this.. someone please correct me if im wrong )
Thanks Guys!
:SNSign: