• Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech

BON MII Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter cobraII
  • Start date Start date May 9, 2004

cobraII

Founding Member
Feb 10, 2000
120
0
0
Mishawaka Indiana
May 9, 2004
#1
  • May 9, 2004
  • #1
You guys seen this thread on Blue Oval News?

http://warnerrobert.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=10;t=003237
 

Blue coyote

Founding Member
Sep 14, 2002
347
0
16
North America's hemp-basket, BC, Canada
May 9, 2004
#2
  • May 9, 2004
  • #2
Yup. I even registered to respond to it. I was pleasantly surprised to see a few posts that show our cars in a positive light...
 

IICrazy

taken away
Mar 28, 2003
976
0
36
Maple Valley, Washington
May 9, 2004
#3
  • May 9, 2004
  • #3
and then there is also people who have no idea what they're talking about
 
C

cobraii74x

New Member
Aug 27, 2003
253
0
0
Altoona, PA
May 9, 2004
#4
  • May 9, 2004
  • #4
I bet half of those a**holes have only seen the II's that come up while they are looking to figure out what the MII suspension is. it is nice to see people who don't own ii's but dont hate them because they are told they suck..
 

Blue coyote

Founding Member
Sep 14, 2002
347
0
16
North America's hemp-basket, BC, Canada
May 9, 2004
#5
  • May 9, 2004
  • #5
IICrazy said:
and then there is also people who have no idea what they're talking about
Click to expand...

Oh, you mean the ones that deserve to drive Yugo's?

Sadly, I think most of us are far too used to that...
 
J

Johan

Member
Jun 12, 2003
81
0
6
Waldheim, LA
May 9, 2004
#6
  • May 9, 2004
  • #6
IICrazy said:
and then there is also people who have no idea what they're talking about
Click to expand...

"the Mustang2 was a well engineered car that brought about many technological advancements to the Mustang and pony car market. Things like rack&pinion steering, 4wheel disc brakes, advanced suspension system"

"Mustang II's are not popular because they were poorly engineered, period."

Rack&pinion? The 2 was certainly not the first car around with rack&pinion, although it was the first car with power-assisted rack&pinion.
4-wheel discs? I wish it were true.
Advanced suspension system? I think it's a great handling car, but leaf springs weren't very advanced.
Poorly engineered? The 2 did have a lot of engineering for the time.

Most people feel that the two lacks respect because it lived at a time when emissions requirements made horsepower a thing of the past. But everybody else at the time had the same problem. For other pony cars and muscle cars though, improving on what the factory offered was a lot easier.

When I got my first car in back in '81 (a '76 V8 Ghia), there were not near as many hop-up parts available for a II as there were for the F-bodies or older Mustangs, particularly when it came to wheels. Sure, you could get 4-barrel carbs and headers, but decent sized wheels? Forget it. You would see Camaros and Firebirds everywhere with Mickey Thompson L50-15 steamrollers on huge Cragar S/S wheels, while virtually every Mustang II running around still had little 13" wheels. There was simply nothing available in the 4-lug bolt pattern. As a result, nearly every 'tough' looking car was something other than a II. The II was very popular in for serious drag racers, but virtually every II around on the street was mundane. So the Mustang II's reputation suffered. Yep, that's my story and I'm stickin' to it: 4-lug wheels whimp-ified the II.

Another area where I think the II's image suffered was in Hollywood. Those other guys had Smokey and the Bandit and Jim Rockford. The older Mustangs had Steve McQueen. We had Charlies Angels. Lovely ladies, but not very macho.
 
A

a351Must2

Windsor II
Founding Member
Mar 12, 1999
4,317
0
0
Snohomish, WA
May 10, 2004
#7
  • May 10, 2004
  • #7
Johan said:
Rack&pinion? The 2 was certainly not the first car around with rack&pinion, although it was the first car with power-assisted rack&pinion.
Click to expand...

Actually, I have a factory power assist + rack&pinion car in my garage..that was built in 1956! Continental MKII
 

Blue Thunder

15 Year Member
Mar 20, 2004
1,003
55
68
Upstate New York.
May 12, 2004
#8
  • May 12, 2004
  • #8
Mustang II did exactly what it was intended to do. Ford sold a sh&t load of those cars during a rough era.
 

Blue Thunder

15 Year Member
Mar 20, 2004
1,003
55
68
Upstate New York.
May 12, 2004
#9
  • May 12, 2004
  • #9
Whoever it was that mentioned that fox bodies are lighter than IIs is crazy.
I have a calibrated truck scale on my property which is extremely accurate, and I like to weigh various vehicles whenever I get the chance. My friend's 90 GT weighed in at 3200 pounds. My 1985 GT weighed 3100 pounds. My 77 Mustang II with a stroker 332, C4 and 9" rear weighs about 2400 pounds, and there are still areas to be lightened on my car.

And I've been heavily into Ford cars and trucks since the mid-70s,(thanks to an older brother who was/is hardcore Ford) yet I'm not a "real car enthusiast" because I love my Mustang II. How about that.

Those guys with the other Stangs saying MIIs are poorly designed or whatever can race me anytime. My car can be cannibalistic.
 

Blue coyote

Founding Member
Sep 14, 2002
347
0
16
North America's hemp-basket, BC, Canada
May 12, 2004
#10
  • May 12, 2004
  • #10
Yeah, but telling US about it won't help. While there are a couple posters to the thread that are willing to admit the II (even if in limited amounts) is a stang, EVERYONE here already knows....How about some extra support over there, eh?
 

Blue Thunder

15 Year Member
Mar 20, 2004
1,003
55
68
Upstate New York.
May 12, 2004
#11
  • May 12, 2004
  • #11
Very well. I registered and posted my response there too. This could get interesting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
962
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Engine Throwing codes 94, 33, 34, 44, and sporadic engine shutoff.
  • Ryu
  • Oct 9, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2024
89ripper
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
T5 Identification Advice Needed
  • Alldegree
  • Mar 12, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
67
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 25, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?