• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

BOSS 302 - How could you let it get like this?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pbum5
  • Start date Start date Dec 28, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last

Pbum5

Member
Oct 27, 2004
515
0
17
Minneapolis, MN
Dec 28, 2005
#1
  • Dec 28, 2005
  • #1
Just wondering how someone could let a BOSS 302 get like this?
Or any other classic/cool car.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4600742662&fromMakeTrack=true
 
J

johnsstang04

Member
Jun 26, 2005
80
0
7
Phoenix, Arizona
Dec 28, 2005
#2
  • Dec 28, 2005
  • #2
did u notice that it has 4 taillights? apparently 2 weren't enough
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Dec 28, 2005
#3
  • Dec 28, 2005
  • #3
I only want the block, maybe the crank.
 

70vert

New Member
Dec 31, 2004
722
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Dec 29, 2005
#4
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #4
love the taillights

johnsstang04 said:
did u notice that it has 4 taillights? apparently 2 weren't enough
Click to expand...


4 taillights:

I guess that's the "Poor Man's Shelby Taillight Mod"?
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Dec 29, 2005
#5
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #5
I can't believe the ad the way it's written. He says it was stored in '74? No way the car got into that condition in 4 years. Unless by stored he means parked outside in a field.

In the '70s and even '80s that car was worth nothing in condition like that. It's hard to imagine that someone is willing to pay so much for a VIN number.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Dec 29, 2005
#6
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #6
crapola
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 29, 2005
#7
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #7
It ain't hard to imagine how it could get that way in the last 35 years. Especially stored outdoors or in a rat infested barn. Love those "quad" tail lights. Did y'all also see where he replaced the front fenders with "genuine" Boss fenders? I didn't realize they were that different from the std fastbacks. Hopefully it'll go to a good home.
 
3

390Fe

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
236
0
0
Pottstown PA
Dec 29, 2005
#8
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #8
D.Hearne said:
: Did y'all also see where he replaced the front fenders with "genuine" Boss fenders? I didn't realize they were that different from the std fastbacks. Hopefully it'll go to a good home.
Click to expand...

There actually was a difference... the Boss fenders were radiused to clear the larger wheel/tire combo. (Nuthin you couldnt do with a baseball bat between the fender and the tire - but it does have a different part number).

Good grief though... I don't think I have ever seen so much rot on a 69-70 car. I recently pulled a '64 Falcon out of the weeds that was in better shape.

Sorry, it's been a loong time since I posted last... and my first post back here I am correcting D.Hearn.
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Dec 29, 2005
#9
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #9
Yeah, the lip was rolled on the Boss cars.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Dec 29, 2005
#10
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #10
10secgoal said:
I only want the block, maybe the crank.
Click to expand...

Okay, give me the title when you are done

EDIT: oh and regarding the "storage" it was in for the last 30 years....

View attachment 493413

Based on the background, it looks like being out in a feild under a plastic (moisture trapping) tarp is what he meant.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Dec 29, 2005
#11
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #11
Edbert said:
Okay, give me the title when you are done

EDIT: oh and regarding the "storage" it was in for the last 30 years....

snipped photo

Based on the background, it looks like being out in a feild under a plastic (moisture trapping) tarp is what he meant.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that would do it... maybe. I would still think that the painted surfaces would be fine, but who knows. I could understand the pans being wet for 30 years could be a little problem.

Why do people do this? That car could be worth a mint.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 29, 2005
#12
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #12
Hack said:
Yeah, that would do it... maybe. I would still think that the painted surfaces would be fine, but who knows. I could understand the pans being wet for 30 years could be a little problem.

Why do people do this? That car could be worth a mint.
Click to expand...
Around here, storing old cars in fields is common practice. I recall one complete 69 Mach I 351W-4bbl car sitting out in a field, looked almost identical to that Boss. It didn't have a cover, the sun baked the paint and interior to toast. You ask them to sell and always get one of two replies: "I'm gonna fix it up someday" or "It's worth a ten times the money you're offering"
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 29, 2005
#13
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #13
390Fe said:
There actually was a difference... the Boss fenders were radiused to clear the larger wheel/tire combo. (Nuthin you couldnt do with a baseball bat between the fender and the tire - but it does have a different part number)
Sorry, it's been a loong time since I posted last... and my first post back here I am correcting D.Hearn.
Click to expand...
Hey, I ain't always right. I'd forgoten about the rolled fender lips. It'd be like Ford to assign them a different part number for a revision that could have been done on the assembly line. ( with a baseball bat )
 

MCABOSS

Founding Member
Oct 18, 2002
245
0
16
BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
Dec 29, 2005
#14
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #14
BOSS fenders

D.Hearne said:
Hey, I ain't always right. I'd forgoten about the rolled fender lips. It'd be like Ford to assign them a different part number for a revision that could have been done on the assembly line. ( with a baseball bat )
Click to expand...

There are actually three different mustang fenders in 1970; BOSS 429, BOSS 302 and regular mustangs.

The BOSS 9 fender is similar to the BOSS 302 but is rolled much tighter and hammered down flat. The fender lip was hammered down over a piece of wire to maintain the consistancy of the wheel opening.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Dec 30, 2005
#15
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #15
I can appreciate it being a Boss, but look at that rust...... There arent any pictures from under the car, either.

I'm most surprised at the View attachment 493335
 

Timmy

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
315
0
0
Conway, Arkansas
Dec 30, 2005
#16
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #16
I think that car has been on eBay before, maybe a year ago maybe more. The extra tail lights and the pic of the engine without the carb reminds me of another auction. I want to say it was a Boss 302 but maybe not.

That thing is rusted bigtime. 10K for a title/vin is what the high bidder is paying for IMO

Tim
 

chepsk8

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2001
2,203
3
49
Easton, PA
Dec 30, 2005
#17
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #17
Love those snow tires! Bring it up here to the NorthEast!

Should not be an original "N" case with 3.50 gears, only Drag-Pack, which this is not. I fear this car will end up in the crusher, and a re-body will be the result.
 
D

danny clemens

Member
May 4, 2005
728
0
16
Dec 30, 2005
#18
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #18
It does look like a lot of moneyfor what you're getting but in 5 or 10 years you guys may be looking back wishing you had bought this one. It's not been that many years ago I wish I had bought a lot of these old cars but at the time they didn't seem like a good deal.
 

MCABOSS

Founding Member
Oct 18, 2002
245
0
16
BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
Dec 30, 2005
#19
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #19
You can't get into a BOSS any cheaper than this. Would take about 25K depending on how handy you were, to get this thing back on the road, but the BOSS 302 values continue to climb.
 

hungrymonkey

White by Birth, Trash By Choice
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,077
12
108
Oregon.
Dec 30, 2005
#20
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #20
I do not believe that the boss cars held much value during the late 70's and through the 80's.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Thinking of building a BOSS 302 bottom end and have some questions!
  • Angelq1028
  • Apr 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
380
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2025
TOOLOW91
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
916
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
4
Overheating
  • 4.6L not a five-o
  • Jan 21, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
275
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 30, 2025
4.6L not a five-o
4
J
'96 Cobra: A/C gets weak and engine misfires under load when warm
  • jruhnke
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
2
Views
317
SVT Tech Forum Nov 20, 2025
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?