• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Boss Rod 5.0 Assembly Has Begun

  • Thread starter Thread starter 66P51GT
  • Start date Start date Dec 22, 2004

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Dec 22, 2004
#1
  • Dec 22, 2004
  • #1
I finally had a chance to drop by FPS last week to pick up my crank so engine assembly has begun. I painted the block on Sunday. I've never seen the approach I took to paint the block before and thought you may enjoy some pics.

The block is a new 5.0 roller with standard bore. I picked it up about four months ago with the crank, rods, pistons, ARP studs, and heads. I got a killer deal... more on that later. I had the block decked .015, front oil galley plugs tapped, and the head bolts were enlarged to use ARP 1/2" studs. This was the only machining I had done.

I used a file to remove the sharp edge on the cylinder bores from the milling. I then used simple green to degrease the block in the driveway and used a wire brush on the external surfaces. I then used a pressure washer to rinse it off. The air compressor took care of the drying. It was a nice day in SoCal (about 80 degrees) so it was a perfect day for painting.

I just finished removing the masking, installed the oil galley plugs, rear camshaft plug, Crane 2031 cam, and coated all the exposed metal surfaces with some penetrating oil. I'll install the nodular crank and Ford Racing timing chain tomorrow.

I used Ford Light Blue VHT spray paint. I've had good luck with this in the past. There are a couple of spots that will need some additional paint but I'll apply with a brush after assembly.

















 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Dec 22, 2004
#2
  • Dec 22, 2004
  • #2
Sweet, love the pictorial. I wouldn't mind seeing the same amount and quality of pics for the rest of the buildup too if you feel like it.
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Dec 22, 2004
#3
  • Dec 22, 2004
  • #3
I agree with 666. Very nice and keep us updated.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Dec 22, 2004
#4
  • Dec 22, 2004
  • #4
agreed
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Dec 22, 2004
#5
  • Dec 22, 2004
  • #5
Thanks for the replies. I'll post pictures as I go. For more engine specs, check out My Garage.
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Dec 23, 2004
#6
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #6
More Progress...

I had to pick up some more 1/2" plugs to cap the front and side oil passages. The block also had a hole for a knock sensor so I plugged it as well.

You can see the screw in plugs in this image. Usually, these are pressed in caps. There isn't really any measurable advantage to using the screw in type except for peace of mind that they won't fall out.



This is the first engine I have used main studs. ARP instructs to install them finger tight. You can also use loc-tite but I decided not to. The studs look cool.



Crank bearings are standard Clevite-77s. FPS said they are all tri-metal now so you can't go wrong.



I also used Lucas Oil for the first time during the install. I really like this stuff. It is heavier than a regular motor oil so it will not slide off during the assembly process. It also ensures there will still be oil on the bearing surfaces for the initial start up (which could be over a month away).

I used plastigage on three of the five bearings and all are good. I applied sealant on the bottom surface rear main cap and in the corners where it sits in the block. This is important so oil doesn't eventually seep into the bell housing.

I used moly lube on the studs when torqing down to 70 ft. lbs. If you use motor oil, you torque to 85 ft. lbs. I also seated the thrust bearing before torking the #3 cap.



Here is a good picture of the timing chain. I ran the cam straight up. I also noticed in the pics there is some surface rust in the timing chain cover so I'll have to run a thread chaser in there to clean them out before installing the cover.



Now... there is some debate on whether or not I need to use an oil slinger or not. My information suggests it is dependant on the timing cover. Mine is pictured below. If the timing cover has the angled bar over the crank sprocket then an oil slinger is not necessary. You either have one or the other, not both. The 289 I removed this from did not have one so I think I'm OK. Before I install the timing cover, I'd like to get a confirmation from someone that what I stated above is OK.



This is the first part I used my bead blaster on (Harbor Freight for $89 on sale). Man I love that thing. There is no way all the scrubbing and solvent could get it as clean as blasting. Here is a good example of the before and after.

Timing covers are typically painted but it looks so good in raw aluminum I'm keeping it this way. It will also set off the aluminum Edelbrock water pump when complete.

 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Dec 23, 2004
#7
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #7
Keep up the good work!
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 23, 2004
#8
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #8
You done good, but I think you really wasted time and effort with all the masking and prep work to paint the block. I don't see how you missed the timing cover bolt holes while doing all that. I guess it's kinda like the saying, "can't see the forest for all the trees" Now you're going to have to be very careful not to get the drippings from them into the rest of the engine.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 23, 2004
#9
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #9
By the way, what rods are you using? Length?
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Dec 23, 2004
#10
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #10
D.Hearne said:
By the way, what rods are you using? Length?
Click to expand...
Carrillo Forged H-Beam 5.155"
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Dec 23, 2004
#11
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #11
D.Hearne said:
You done good, but I think you really wasted time and effort with all the masking and prep work to paint the block.
Click to expand...
Well, the only thing that is getting painted on the engine is the block. Everything else (except the pan) is Aluminum. The Canton pan doesn't need paint. This was easier than scraping all the overspray off of the head, timing cover, and oil pan gasket surfaces so I have to disagree.

D.Hearne said:
I don't see how you missed the timing cover bolt holes while doing all that. I guess it's kinda like the saying, "can't see the forest for all the trees" Now you're going to have to be very careful not to get the drippings from them into the rest of the engine.
Click to expand...
It looks worse in the pictures than it actually is. It is just a little surface rust but I still need to clean it up or the torque ratings will get fouled up. I'll just use some moly lube or grease when running the chaser in there. That should pick up most of the shavings.

I don't know how long the engine had been sitting but these are the only threads that have the problem.

Off to the airport heading for Tuscon. Happly Holidays everyone!
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 23, 2004
#12
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #12
I was going to do a long rod 302 also before I did the 331, but I was thinking on using 5.4 inch rods. To me there just isn't a whole lot of difference between the lengths of the 302 and Boss rods to make it worth while. I believe the only reason Ford used the 289 length rods in the Bosses was the tooling was already done.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Dec 24, 2004
#13
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #13
D.Hearne said:
I was going to do a long rod 302 also before I did the 331, but I was thinking on using 5.4 inch rods. To me there just isn't a whole lot of difference between the lengths of the 302 and Boss rods to make it worth while. I believe the only reason Ford used the 289 length rods in the Bosses was the tooling was already done.
Click to expand...
And they had to design a piston anyway for the different valve layout.
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Dec 24, 2004
#14
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #14
D.Hearne said:
I was going to do a long rod 302 also before I did the 331, but I was thinking on using 5.4 inch rods. To me there just isn't a whole lot of difference between the lengths of the 302 and Boss rods to make it worth while. I believe the only reason Ford used the 289 length rods in the Bosses was the tooling was already done.
Click to expand...
I agree, but I could not pass up a deal for a new block, Carrillo rods, ARP stud kits (crank, heads, screw-in studs), nodular crank, Speed Pro racing pistons, and ported Edelbrock RPM cylinder heads for $2,200!

I did an initial mockup of the engine to make sure everything fit properly. I thought I had a problem when I first measured the rods since they didn't measure to the standard 302 length. The rod length was more of a bonus than a conscious thought. Anyhow, after the mockup I measured the distance between the piston and the deck height and it was about .016 off. I had the deck milled .015 to bring it to a near zero deck height. I also had the heads milled .015 to bump the compression up a bit.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 24, 2004
#15
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #15
66P51GT said:
I agree, but I could not pass up a deal for a new block, Carrillo rods, ARP stud kits (crank, heads, screw-in studs), nodular crank, Speed Pro racing pistons, and ported Edelbrock RPM cylinder heads for $2,200!

I did an initial mockup of the engine to make sure everything fit properly. I thought I had a problem when I first measured the rods since they didn't measure to the standard 302 length. The rod length was more of a bonus than a conscious thought. Anyhow, after the mockup I measured the distance between the piston and the deck height and it was about .016 off. I had the deck milled .015 to bring it to a near zero deck height. I also had the heads milled .015 to bump the compression up a bit.
Click to expand...
I see now why you went with them, I'd have done the same Must be custom pistons, if you mocked it up and they were still .016 down the hole, unless the block's deck was taller than spec.
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Dec 28, 2004
#16
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #16
D.Hearne said:
I see now why you went with them, I'd have done the same Must be custom pistons, if you mocked it up and they were still .016 down the hole, unless the block's deck was taller than spec.
Click to expand...
The pistons are custom and could actually be Chevy slugs. The tops of the pistons have also been bead blasted. I assume this is to harden the surface and help against possible detonation damage. I'll post some pics of the pistons in a day or so. I'm still in Tucson enjoying the Western mountain views.
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Dec 29, 2004
#17
  • Dec 29, 2004
  • #17
It looks great keep up the great work!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
889
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
574
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
SOLD For Sale '92 LX Street/Drag car - WV
  • MikeyMustang
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 31, 2025
MikeyMustang
Progress Thread "Alter Ego" White 1993 LX 5.0 5spd
  • idareu
  • Sep 9, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2025
idareu
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?