• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Building a 331 (_(*`'

  • Thread starter Thread starter defcondaze
  • Start date Start date May 17, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jun 7, 2006
#21
  • Jun 7, 2006
  • #21
defcondaze said:
Well guys i've just decided to forget tring to get my engine built at a shop and am now selling the stroker kit/block i have

i ordered a dss pro bullit 331 short block (should be here today) with n-61 cam gonna use twisted heads w anderson spring upgrade 1.6 rockers 77maf 30 lb injectors 70mm accufab tb and holley system maxII intake, any guess on my power out put ?

i will be posting my dyno sheets hopefully within 2 months when ill be hauln ass with my new engine
Click to expand...


Shoulda went 347 if you were buying a new shortblock.

I can see 350rwhp with that combo. I would have gone with an N-71 cam or if you have the gear and compression, an N-91.
 

MrKwik

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,008
0
0
Kansas City, Kansas
Jun 7, 2006
#22
  • Jun 7, 2006
  • #22
I just wanted to stick my nose in here about the oil ring issue. I thought pretty much the whole reason for going with a 331 over a 347 was that the 331 didnt have the oil ring through the pin and would be a better street motor due to not having the oil consumption issues that 347's are known for due to the pin location. No?
 

88Stang331

New Member
Mar 30, 2006
239
0
0
Jun 7, 2006
#23
  • Jun 7, 2006
  • #23
MrKwik said:
I just wanted to stick my nose in here about the oil ring issue. I thought pretty much the whole reason for going with a 331 over a 347 was that the 331 didnt have the oil ring through the pin and would be a better street motor due to not having the oil consumption issues that 347's are known for due to the pin location. No?
Click to expand...

+1. I talked to the guys at Scat and said they recommended the 331 for a street driven vehicle because of the oil consumption issue, and that at higher RPM's the 331 produced more HP by a considerable amount.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jun 7, 2006
#24
  • Jun 7, 2006
  • #24
88Stang331 said:
+1. I talked to the guys at Scat and said they recommended the 331 for a street driven vehicle because of the oil consumption issue, and that at higher RPM's the 331 produced more HP by a considerable amount.
Click to expand...


LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

News flash for some of you people, some 331 kits come with the pin through the oil ring But that doesn't matter regardless. Nope, 331's do NOT make more power up top over 347's. Using the same induction parts on each engine, the 347 makes more from idle to where ever you let off the throttle Go over to www.hardcore50.com and post the crap you just posted and you will be fu cking laughed at!!

If your stroker burns oil, it wasn't built/machined correctly.

To answer your question Mr. Kwik, the answer is no
 
D

defcondaze

Member
Nov 3, 2004
48
0
6
Jun 7, 2006
#25
  • Jun 7, 2006
  • #25
i've read alot about the oil ring issue and i hear its mostly the way the block is honed/prepd if the bore is good then you should have no problems , the 347 pistons nowadays dont have the wristpin with the oil ring anyway, but i still decided to go with the 331 because i plan on adding a blower later (8psi) and theres less stress on the block with 331 over 347
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jun 7, 2006
#26
  • Jun 7, 2006
  • #26
defcondaze said:
i've read alot about the oil ring issue and i hear its mostly the way the block is honed/prepd if the bore is good then you should have no problems , the 347 pistons nowadays dont have the wristpin with the oil ring anyway, but i still decided to go with the 331 because i plan on adding a blower later (8psi) and theres less stress on the block with 331 over 347
Click to expand...

Smart choice since its a stock block combo, go with the smaller engine. The 347 will obviously make more than the 331 so no need to make as much power as you can with the stock block. I forgot that you were doing a blower. If it was n/a, 347 would be the better choice.
 
J

jjd975

Founding Member
Jul 17, 2000
4,236
0
0
louisville,kentucky
Jun 7, 2006
#27
  • Jun 7, 2006
  • #27
With a blower I would think the 331 is a waste in a stock block. A 302 with boost can just as easily split the stock block.

I honesty dont see why guys build these blown strokers with stock blocks. Just me.
 
D

defcondaze

Member
Nov 3, 2004
48
0
6
Jun 7, 2006
#28
  • Jun 7, 2006
  • #28
good to around 550 hp, dss informed me they have alot of people runing pro bullit strokers with more boost than i plan to use
 
D

defcondaze

Member
Nov 3, 2004
48
0
6
Jun 7, 2006
#29
  • Jun 7, 2006
  • #29
actually i just notice their super pro bullit (next one up from mine) is still a stock block and handles 650
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jun 8, 2006
#30
  • Jun 8, 2006
  • #30
If an oil ring obstructs the piston ring designation, it does matter.

A 331 has a better piston/rod ratio and the pistons have more "meat" on them. Good for boosted applications.

331's have less average piston speed, some could argue better longevity.

A 331 will be revving more freely at the higher rpms than a 347, but the 347 will make a bit more hp.

The 331 was a great choice, good luck with it and have fun.
 
D

defcondaze

Member
Nov 3, 2004
48
0
6
Sep 22, 2009
#31
  • Sep 22, 2009
  • #31
well i finally got it all done !

heres a sound clip from dyno day.

dyno day
 

poulrais

New Member
Mar 25, 2009
44
0
0
Sherbrooke. Quebec, Canada
Sep 22, 2009
#32
  • Sep 22, 2009
  • #32
Holly sh***!!! Is there an error in the prior posts dates or it really took you 3 years to get it done?? You're one hell of a patient guy!!
 
J

jerryD

Founding Member
Mar 16, 2000
1,061
0
37
Gladstone, MO
Sep 22, 2009
#33
  • Sep 22, 2009
  • #33
it took me at least 5 years to save up to build my car. kinda hard when i was making maybe $300/week, with child support payment at like 40%(thanks Missouri) plus other normal bills on top of that. only used card if i had to order from summit or whoever, but i paid it off at the end of the month after saving months on end before i made an order. i paid cash for everything i could get local.

poulrais said:
Holly sh***!!! Is there an error in the prior posts dates or it really took you 3 years to get it done?? You're one hell of a patient guy!!
Click to expand...
 

poulrais

New Member
Mar 25, 2009
44
0
0
Sherbrooke. Quebec, Canada
Sep 23, 2009
#34
  • Sep 23, 2009
  • #34
Yeah I know what you mean!! I'm also separated with 3 kids and my employer cut our wages 10% this year... So I just waited for some guy to go broke and I bought the car from him with all the goodies at a very good price. I knew I didn't have the money nor the time to build a car from scratch so that was my only option. Too bad for the guy who had to sell his ride but if I hadn't bought it, someone else would've... But I did manage to shelve another 3 grands in the car afterwards to turn the car from a drag configuration to a lapping suspension setup.
 
D

defcondaze

Member
Nov 3, 2004
48
0
6
Sep 23, 2009
#35
  • Sep 23, 2009
  • #35
dyno results

poulrais said:
Holly sh***!!! Is there an error in the prior posts dates or it really took you 3 years to get it done?? You're one hell of a patient guy!!
Click to expand...

if you want to count from when i started buying parts it would be 6-7years total.

heres the dyno results if anyone is interested



 

poulrais

New Member
Mar 25, 2009
44
0
0
Sherbrooke. Quebec, Canada
Sep 23, 2009
#36
  • Sep 23, 2009
  • #36
Good but was these numbers achieved with a tune? Seems your A/F ratio at peak hp and torque is a little on the lean side no?
 
D

defcondaze

Member
Nov 3, 2004
48
0
6
Sep 23, 2009
#37
  • Sep 23, 2009
  • #37
poulrais said:
Good but was these numbers achieved with a tune? Seems your A/F ratio at peak hp and torque is a little on the lean side no?
Click to expand...

yes the blue lines are after the tune, red is stock computer run.
i dont have a supercharger yet, not sure when if ever i will get one.
12.5:1 A/F i was told was pretty much ideal for a n/a combo
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Sep 23, 2009
#38
  • Sep 23, 2009
  • #38
12.5:1 is just fine for a N/A motor
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
781
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
I
289 cam break in help
  • iaff284
  • Aug 19, 2022
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
803
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Aug 19, 2022
iaff284
I
M
For Sale Edelbrock Performer Ford cam and lifter set-429/460
  • My2001car
  • Dec 11, 2023
  • Other Classifieds
Replies
0
Views
879
Other Classifieds Dec 11, 2023
My2001car
M
SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
M
Engine Cam Question
  • Middleagecrisis
  • Jan 10, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 14, 2022
Middleagecrisis
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?