• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Forced Induction Buying A Vortech Kit Have Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter N8Dogg98
  • Start date Start date Aug 30, 2012
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Aug 30, 2012
#1
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #1
I'll be in the market for a Vortech kit sometime in the next 6 months and have a few questions.

Should I buy the V2 or V3? I like the idea of not having to tap the oil pan and having a unit with its own oil supply so I'm leaning towards a V3. How challenging is changing the SC oil in the V3? How often must it be changed?

I already have a handheld tuner (SCT) so I'll probably buy a tuner kit. What injectors should I buy and which fuel pump will be both the most economical and most reliable for my 1998 GT?

Some of you know that I have stage 2 NPI N/A cams in my car. Will my car run like chit with these cams AND a supercharger? Am I better off switching back to the PI cams that were in my car before, or can I live with the NPI N/A cams for a while and change them out to some blower cams later?

I'll probably end up buying just the supercharger kit without an intercooler/aftercooler, however I'd probably plan on adding one later on down the line. Is it relatively easy to add an intercooler/aftercooler and which one is better?
 
R

rconaway

Founding Member
Nov 11, 1999
1,415
3
39
Phoenix, Az.
Aug 30, 2012
#2
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #2
I would stick with the V2 unless you are planning on putting new heads and intercooler on the car. The stage 2 cams are fine. I had to put dual Walbro 255's on my car to get enough fuel to handle more then 400hp.
 

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Aug 30, 2012
#3
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #3
rconaway said:
I would stick with the V2 unless you are planning on putting new heads and intercooler on the car. The stage 2 cams are fine. I had to put dual Walbro 255's on my car to get enough fuel to handle more then 400hp.
Click to expand...

What do new heads and an intercooler have to do with the manner in which the SC is lubricated? Why do you think the V2 is better than the V3?

Will I see better performance out of my NPI engine with PI cams or if I just keep the NPI N/A stage 2 MHS cams in there now?

Can I use a Focus SVT pump instead?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,033
21,207
234
Box behind Walmart
Aug 30, 2012
#4
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #4
N8Dogg98 said:
What do new heads and an intercooler have to do with the manner in which the SC is lubricated? Why do you think the V2 is better than the V3?

Will I see better performance out of my NPI engine with PI cams or if I just keep the NPI N/A stage 2 MHS cams in there now?

Can I use a Focus SVT pump instead?
Click to expand...

I was wondering the same thing....

I also don't understand why two pumps are required for 400HP. I mean... I get that it's a returnless system but a single 255 should provide considerably more fuel than what is needed for 400HP.

On the Dual Pump thing... Heads up that the fuel controller may not be able to handle both pumps at boost. I remember a portion of another convo where someone had to install a second controller.
 

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Aug 30, 2012
#5
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #5
Thing is I'd probably only run the thing at 6-8 PSI and if later on down the road I decided to add an intercooler and up the boost to > 10 PSI then I'd add a second pump as necessary. I still wouldn't do this without building a good short block first.

Regardless, with NPI heads I'll be lucky to see 350RWHP with a simple non-intercooled vortech kit. As much as I'd love to get more power, it just ain't gonna happen... not on my tuner's dyno at least (238 RWHP with my cams... for comparison the same combo runs 275 RWHP on a DynoJet).
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,033
21,207
234
Box behind Walmart
Aug 30, 2012
#6
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #6
N8Dogg98 said:
Thing is I'd probably only run the thing at 6-8 PSI and if later on down the road I decided to add an intercooler and up the boost to > 10 PSI then I'd add a second pump as necessary. I still wouldn't do this without building a good short block first.

Regardless, with NPI heads I'll be lucky to see 350RWHP with a simple non-intercooled vortech kit. As much as I'd love to get more power, it just ain't gonna happen... not on my tuner's dyno at least (238 RWHP with my cams... for comparison the same combo runs 275 RWHP on a DynoJet).
Click to expand...

With your setup, I'd probably go PD blower all day, every day but I get the part about wanting to buy the blower one time with room to do more "stuff" later on.

For what it's worth, I'd be down with the V3 setup. Can't beat a self-contained system, regardless of what blower you go with. That and the air to air system is why I tend to lean more towards the ATI kits.
 
Reactions: fiveohwblow

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Aug 30, 2012
#7
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #7
What does my setup have to do with it? (honest question, no troll)... why do you think that?

Thing is PD blowers are EXPENSIVE! I can find 96-98 GT SQ Vortech kits all day on Corral for around $2,000... KB didn't make many PD blowers for the 96-98's and if you can find one it is only the 1.7L with no room to grow above 400RWHP. I like the TorkTech kits, but they're only for PI headed cars and I don't really feel like the hassle of having to source all the random parts necessary to make them work.

At the end of the day, I'd really rather not have to spend 5-8K on a complete engine with PI heads just so I can run an overpriced supercharger like a KB or a TorkTech. OTOH for under $3,000 (including dyno time AND fuel system upgrades) I can have a complete running car with plenty of room to grow in the future.

I really wish I had the funds available for a more entertaining setup like a forged engine, ported PI heads or TFS heads, blower cams, and an intercooled PD blower, but I don't. In fact, I spent 6 hours over the weekend going over the medical bills my family has incurred over the past 3.5 years and put it all on a spreadsheet... I've spent $21,000 in medical bills since June 2009... f**king crazy.... we have an on-going cost of $4,000 per year for my son due to his monthly lab appointments and daily medicine.... anyways, this is why I'm looking at the Vortech as it will provide solid reliable performance and won't break the bank.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,033
21,207
234
Box behind Walmart
Aug 30, 2012
#8
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #8
N8Dogg98 said:
What does my setup have to do with it? (honest question, no troll)... why do you think that?
Click to expand...

...because for the most part, NPIs are (comparitively) gutless in the torque generation department. That little 1.7L blower will fill those combustion chambers more completely and for the largest duration of the combustion cycle vs. any other power adder except for maybe a good (well matched) turbo. That said, I agree 100% with everything you posted.

I wouldn't put out the expense for that PD unless it was the only engine mod I had any intention of doing to that motor.
 

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Aug 30, 2012
#9
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #9
Noobz347 said:
...because for the most part, NPIs are (comparitively) gutless in the torque generation department. That little 1.7L blower will fill those combustion chambers more completely and for the largest duration of the combustion cycle vs. any other power adder except for maybe a good (well matched) turbo. That said, I agree 100% with everything you posted.

I wouldn't put out the expense for that PD unless it was the only engine mod I had any intention of doing to that motor.
Click to expand...

Not true at all, my car will OWN a PI mustang up to 4K RPM. The NPI's had impressive LE torque from the factory and given that I now have the MHS stage 2 NPI N/A cams with the aggressive intake centerline my car comes on very strong from 2K RPM's, flatlines at 4800 RPM's, and drops off very quickly at 5500 RPMs. With a PD blower, I'd probably see a very nice progressive torque curve.

4V cars, especially the 96-98's, definitely lacked in the torque department and would be best served by a PD blower.
 

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Aug 30, 2012
#10
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #10
Here is another question. After installation with the bigger injectors, fuel pump, etc... how the f do I get it running well enough to limp it to my tuner?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,033
21,207
234
Box behind Walmart
Aug 30, 2012
#11
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #11
N8Dogg98 said:
Not true at all, my car will OWN a PI mustang up to 4K RPM. The NPI's had impressive LE torque from the factory and given that I now have the MHS stage 2 NPI N/A cams with the aggressive intake centerline my car comes on very strong from 2K RPM's, flatlines at 4800 RPM's, and drops off very quickly at 5500 RPMs. With a PD blower, I'd probably see a very nice progressive torque curve.

4V cars, especially the 96-98's, definitely lacked in the torque department and would be best served by a PD blower.
Click to expand...


You know the car better than I do (I've driven maybe half a dozen and never owned one), but I can tell you that there'd be nothing "progressive" about the torque curve... On a dyno, it would look more like vertical cliff with a 90* shelf screwed into the side of it.

N8Dogg98 said:
Here is another question. After installation with the bigger injectors, fuel pump, etc... how the f do I get it running well enough to limp it to my tuner?
Click to expand...

You don't unless you're also installing a MAF that is intended to match the injectors you're putting in.
 

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Aug 30, 2012
#12
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #12
Noobz347 said:
You know the car better than I do (I've driven maybe half a dozen and never owned one), but I can tell you that there'd be nothing "progressive" about the torque curve... On a dyno, it would look more like vertical cliff with a 90* shelf screwed into the side of it.
Click to expand...

Have you driven a cammed NPI car?

Noobz347 said:
You don't unless you're also installing a MAF that is intended to match the injectors you're putting in.
Click to expand...

I thought it was different with OBDII cars in that you can set injector pulse based on MAF readings. So it begs the question how do I get to the tuner shop? Can I use my SCT tuner to tell the car what size injectors I'm running and just yltake it easy?

trinity_gt wmburns I know you two have lots of experience ... any help would be appreciated

Winters98GT any info you may have about Vortech units would be helpful, even if it is related to LSx units.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,033
21,207
234
Box behind Walmart
Aug 30, 2012
#13
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #13
N8Dogg98 said:
Have you driven a cammed NPI car?



I thought it was different with OBDII cars in that you can set injector pulse based on MAF readings. So it begs the question how do I get to the tuner shop? Can I use my SCT tuner to tell the car what size injectors I'm running and just yltake it easy?

trinity_gt wmburns I know you two have lots of experience ... any help would be appreciated
Click to expand...

You can get an SCT tune and have it ready to install prior to performing the mayhem.
 

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Aug 30, 2012
#14
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #14
that's a good plan... I'll see if my tuner can write me a simple canned safe tune that will at least allow the car to idle properly and cruise to his shop 20 miles away.

Thanks Noobz!

The only questions I have left are regarding injector size (I was thinking 42# injectors), whether or not N/A cams will negatively impact performance, and V2 vs. V3 ... anyone with experience using either unit, please chime in.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,033
21,207
234
Box behind Walmart
Aug 30, 2012
#15
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #15
N8Dogg98 said:
that's a good plan... I'll see if my tuner can write me a simple canned safe tune that will at least allow the car to idle properly and cruise to his shop 20 miles away.

Thanks Noobz!

The only questions I have left are regarding injector size (I was thinking 42# injectors), whether or not N/A cams will negatively impact performance, and V2 vs. V3 ... anyone with experience using either unit, please chime in.
Click to expand...

I'm not a centrifugal expert but I've not seen an N/A cam yet, that had a NEGATIVE effect on boost. Generally, low(er) compression and cams with a little more duration on the exhaust side, tend to eek the most out of whatever boost you toss at it. All that extra air velocity screaming down that intake should really wake up your mid and upper ranges. You might want to tweak the rev limiter a couple hundred rpm higher too. Your tuner should know what's best.

No matter really... The boost is going to help... without doubt.
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Aug 30, 2012
#16
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #16
I would assume your cams are sill better than stock considering your power goals. It will require less boost. Also, the walbro HIPO 255 is good to 500 rwhp. No need for more, even with returnless. Fwiw on a dyno jet I am chasing 500 rwhp and have more fuel than I need with the walbro 255 and flow matched 42's.

Lastly, you are concerned about looks. The v3 just flat out looks cleaner and that's the single largest benefit. Yes not tapping your oil pan is another as is self contained etc etc but those are obvious. Also less work for installation.

You already have your power/tq curves figured out. You need help up top. Typically for your budget a centri is EXACTLY what you need here, and the lower end PD blowers lose steam up top, comparatively. You're already on the right track.
 

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Aug 30, 2012
#17
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #17
fiveohwblow said:
I would assume your cams are sill better than stock considering your power goals. It will require less boost. Also, the walbro HIPO 255 is good to 500 rwhp. No need for more, even with returnless. Fwiw on a dyno jet I am chasing 500 rwhp and have more fuel than I need with the walbro 255 and flow matched 42's.
Click to expand...

thanks J, that's helpful

fiveohwblow said:
Lastly, you are concerned about looks. The v3 just flat out looks cleaner and that's the single largest benefit. Yes not tapping your oil pan is another as is self contained etc etc but those are obvious. Also less work for installation.
Click to expand...

I am... I like my chit clean only thing is the V3 is relatively new so it may be a challenge to find a deal on a used one. That said, paying a little more for a brand new "clean looking" unit with a warranty certainly isn't a bad idea. Tuner kits seem to cost around $2800 which is quite reasonable.... although I found a relatively new complete V2 SQ on Corral with an intercooler and the fuel system components for only $2300 today.

fiveohwblow said:
You already have your power/tq curves figured out. You need help up top. Typically for your budget a centri is EXACTLY what you need here, and the lower end PD blowers lose steam up top, comparatively. You're already on the right track.
Click to expand...

That's what I'm thinking.... plus, I like the ability to upgrade w/o hassle if I ever have a built engine and want to really crank up the boost. If I did do a built engine, I'd get ported heads, cams, and run 10:1 or 10.5:1 compression anyways so low end torque shouldn't be a problem then either.
 

wht93gtEd

Active Member
Nov 11, 2004
0
9
29
Jersey Shore, New Jersey
Aug 30, 2012
#18
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #18
My 98 has a V1 pushing 11.5lbs boost with stock long block.
60lb injectors, 90mm lightning MAF, walbro in tank 255 and in line vortech t-rex.
Tuned and runs beautifully.

The tune is pretty rich, you don't want to be behind me if it's in boost.
 

1fun281

Member
Mar 16, 2009
438
8
19
Atlanta Georgia
Aug 30, 2012
#19
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #19
Do a vortech, PD blowers are very limited and run out of breath down low, nothing but stump pullers! 3.73, vortech, good cams, longtubes, maybe an intake one day if you do heads and it will run hard!
 

joshjwc9

Active Member
Jun 12, 2006
1,095
17
39
Palm Harbor, FL
Aug 30, 2012
#20
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #20
1fun281 said:
Do a vortech, PD blowers are very limited and run out of breath down low, nothing but stump pullers! 3.73, vortech, good cams, longtubes, maybe an intake one day if you do heads and it will run hard!
Click to expand...

Yea, I've ridden in extreme versions of both blowers and the centri's are still where the fun is at for me.

I drove my car 18 miles with mismatched MAF and injectors to my tuner, just don't get in boost, it only didnt want to idle at stop lights..but it got there and put down 380/378 non intercooled on a Mustang dyno in 80 degree and 100% humidity weather, in a 132k mile stock motor...
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Auto City Classics 67-70 Mustang disc brake kit question/s
  • GOvert
  • Jun 30, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
51
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 30, 2026
GOvert
G
9
WTB: Procharger or Vortech Supercharger – 1996–1998 Mustang GT 4.6 2V – Budget $3,200
  • 96mustang.gt
  • Nov 20, 2025
  • Want to Buy
Replies
1
Views
323
Want to Buy May 3, 2026
roblabsn95
R
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
880
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
843
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Buying with a bad motor?
  • djj62478
  • Mar 8, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
276
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 11, 2026
TTSaleen
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?