• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Forced Induction Bypass valve reference

  • Thread starter Thread starter JD1964
  • Start date Start date Jun 1, 2025

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,518
194
Maryland
Jun 1, 2025
#1
  • Jun 1, 2025
  • #1
On my 302 with Vortech V3, im cleaning up and replacing some of the vacuum lines.

Im still running the complete EVAP system and its fully functional as far as I can tell. I want to keep the system functional because I like walking into my garage and not smelling gas fumes.

As for the vacuum/boost reference line to my bypass valve in the intake tube, is it ok to T that into the vacuum line that runs down to the charcoal canister? The benefit for using that particular line is that it already passes in close proximity to the bypass valve. I just want to make sure there wont be any conflict in proper operation of the two systems.

Thanks, John
 

nicholase

I lubed and pushed, until it was all the way in
May 21, 2024
613
1,083
103
New York
Jun 1, 2025
#2
  • Jun 1, 2025
  • #2
Don't use that one. That's the canister purge pathway. While it does have vacuum on it (at most times) it's a switched source. Meaning when the can-p solenoid opens fuel vapors pass through that line as it pulls them into the intake. During that process that line loses vacuum because it's flowing fuel vapors.

Just run all your boost stuff to the open port on the firewall vacuum tree. T your guage and any other boost related functions to that.
 
Reactions: JD1964

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,518
194
Maryland
Jun 1, 2025
#3
  • Jun 1, 2025
  • #3
Im curious here because for one, the purge valve would be downstream of my bypass T. So, vacuum or boost reference will always be available to the bypass valve regardless of the purge valve being opened or closed. Also generally, when the purge valve opens to pull vapors back into the intake, doesnt that essentially create a vacuum leak (small somewhat) that the entire plenum is subjected to? Meaning that, all lines connected to the plenum (which includes the vacuum T on the firewall) will recognize the same change that the vapor line sees. Correct or not?
 

nicholase

I lubed and pushed, until it was all the way in
May 21, 2024
613
1,083
103
New York
Jun 1, 2025
#4
  • Jun 1, 2025
  • #4
I'm not sure i follow your question. It's bad practice to combine multiple vacuum systems. Here's a video that helps explain some of it. Start at the 17:37 mark. There's good info there.


 
Reactions: JD1964

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,881
21,063
234
Box behind Walmart
Jun 1, 2025
#5
  • Jun 1, 2025
  • #5
JD1964 said:
Also generally, when the purge valve opens to pull vapors back into the intake, doesnt that essentially create a vacuum leak (small somewhat) that the entire plenum is subjected to? Meaning that, all lines connected to the plenum (which includes the vacuum T on the firewall) will recognize the same change that the vapor line sees. Correct or not?
Click to expand...

You are neglecting the relationship between pressure and volume.

It's easy to tap into a line and destroy normal airflow by "relieving" pressure through an alternate path that was [not] intended to carry more volume than necessary for [a] particular device to operate.

Your question about going back to the intake:

Look at [all] of the available air volume in the intake versus the volume available in an enclosed 1/4" vacuum line that is X number of inches away from the vacuum source.

The mass of air in the intake ensure that there is enough volume for each vacuum accessory plus a few more.
 
Last edited: Jun 1, 2025
Reactions: JD1964

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,518
194
Maryland
Jun 1, 2025
#6
  • Jun 1, 2025
  • #6
Ok, my brain (oldish) gets it now. Thanks people
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Vortech V3 Si - Bypass Valve to BOV swap issues
  • seanmahoney
  • Jun 26, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
502
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 26, 2025
seanmahoney
Forced Induction Bypass valve backwards?
  • Dontknowchit
  • Jun 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
288
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 29, 2025
JD1964
Vortech v3 Si Blow-Off Valve
  • seanmahoney
  • Jun 9, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
237
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2025
seanmahoney
Engine on3 Conversion to draw through MAF?
  • sav22rem22
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
248
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2025
sav22rem22
finding wiring from PCM to fuel tank pressure sensor
  • Roont
  • Oct 19, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
190
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2025
Roont
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?