• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Cable clutch or Hydraulic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter steel1212
  • Start date Start date Jul 31, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Aug 2, 2004
#21
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #21
gp001 said:
Yes, the first generation McLeod bearings had the crappy banjo fittings. The second generation have the AN swivels. Also, the bolt on TO bearings are self adjusting. Just make sure you measure correctly for the right fit. If you go the hyd to bearing route order direct from McLeod so you can get the proper one. If you get it from somewhere else you may need to send it to McLeod so they can swap the pistons. I describe how to measure on my website.
To spread the forces out I mounted the master cylinder using aluminum blocks on both sides of the firewall. This also made it easier to make it mount to the pedal.
Click to expand...
My T/O bearing is also self adjusting, problem is, there's only so much travel built into it, and when the clutch disc wears to the point where the piston is extended to it's farthest point of travel, you have to pull the trans back and adjust the sleeve in the bearing to compensate for it. This one is also the specific bearing for a Toploader. It also works with any other transmission with the same input shaft diameter as the Toploader, such as a Tremec or T-5 with the use of the additional spacer ring.
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Aug 2, 2004
#22
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #22
I use a stock 5.0 Fox cable and the MustangSteve quadrant. No issues so far. I did have to modify one primary tube on my headers for clearance.
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Aug 2, 2004
#23
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #23
D.Hearne said:
So I guess after all these posts, you haven't read any of it ?
Click to expand...

I have, but nothing in there really indicates to me why you would choose one over the other except that the slave cylinder version is easier to repair and adjust
 

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Aug 2, 2004
#24
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #24
I have a Hydraulic Master/Slave clutch set up on my old stang. I tried the clutch cable setup first and it just didn't work for me at all. You have a lot less pedal effort with a hydraulic setup anyway, and that is another reason why I'm glad I went that way. You can see what I did on my uncompleted website. http://webpages.acs.ttu.edu/jikelly/Tremec page.htm
http://webpages.acs.ttu.edu/jikelly/pictures.htm

It was really pretty easy to set up this system and after a year and 4650 miles I have had no leaks and have only adjusted the linkage once.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Aug 2, 2004
#25
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #25
skywalker said:
I have, but nothing in there really indicates to me why you would choose one over the other except that the slave cylinder version is easier to repair and adjust
Click to expand...
The reason I went with the McCleod setup on my Ranger was for the simple reason, that I had no other options. With a classic Stang, you have several options. You just need to go back and re-read all the posts here, and make up your own mind. Don't rely on us to make your decisions for you. When you do this, and you have problems down the road, you'll be blaming us It's your car, you have to live with it.
 
S

STSFCTN67

Member
Feb 5, 2003
450
0
16
Denver, CO
Aug 2, 2004
#26
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #26
I tried everything to keep my clutch cable from heating up but it melted anyway. I tried the brackets and the wrap but my headers were too close and even after beating the ceramic to death there still was not enough clearance. If you are going to make the investment with nice headers get the JMC kit.
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Aug 3, 2004
#27
  • Aug 3, 2004
  • #27
D.Hearne said:
The reason I went with the McCleod setup on my Ranger was for the simple reason, that I had no other options. With a classic Stang, you have several options. You just need to go back and re-read all the posts here, and make up your own mind. Don't rely on us to make your decisions for you. When you do this, and you have problems down the road, you'll be blaming us It's your car, you have to live with it.
Click to expand...


Not at all what I'm trying to do! I'm just wanting an idea of what could go wrong with each system and what works better about each one, so that I can make a more informed decision!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
67 Mustang, with the 302 want to convert auto back to the original manual
  • Pdunn
  • May 3, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
116
Classic Mustang Specific Tech May 7, 2026
Mcmahst
M
Help with bellhousing ID
  • mystic122468
  • Jul 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
457
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 1, 2025
AeroCoupe
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
289
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
Removing speedo cable from the VSS
  • 91AOD5.0LX
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
778
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
91AOD5.0LX
S
  • Locked
Drivetrain Adjustable clutch cable questions
  • Scott_S
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
406
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?