• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

Cadillac CTS-V Oh My...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pliskin
  • Start date Start date Sep 10, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

Pliskin

New Member
Jul 27, 2004
109
0
0
Sep 10, 2005
#1
  • Sep 10, 2005
  • #1
Now this is an amazing car. GM pulled everything right with what I've seen. i was sitting around the dealership today and some guy came in with a new CTS-V. AMAZING exhaust sound, FAST as a hell, LOOKS like a toy car. Wait what? Yeah it looks like its made out of the cheapest plastic ever. But daaaang that thing is a beast. Don't know what I'd do if I saw a STS-V.



Anyone race one in a stang? Would get wasted.
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Sep 10, 2005
#2
  • Sep 10, 2005
  • #2
Just went to the site, looks bad. I wish it had exhaust clips, they're talking too loud during it. I'll take one when the roadster comes out please.
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Sep 10, 2005
#3
  • Sep 10, 2005
  • #3
Nevermind, just looked further. The XLR doesn't come in stick. Only the STS does that doesn't make much sense...
 

squares98

Member
Aug 20, 2004
852
0
17
Orange,ca
Sep 10, 2005
#4
  • Sep 10, 2005
  • #4
The STS comes in stick now>? Thats just plain retarded. My friend has a cts-v, I think a 05+ could take it with minor bolt ons. My car on the other hand sees tail lights after 30mph
 

Szlachcic

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
168
0
0
Raleigh, NC
Sep 10, 2005
#5
  • Sep 10, 2005
  • #5
I was passing next to a guy in a CTS-V and I guess he thought I was trying to race b/c he took off. It was on a road with a lot of cops usually so I didn't bother. It definately was fast though.
 

SpeedyArizona

New Member
Aug 28, 2005
3
0
0
North Scottsdale, AZ
Sep 10, 2005
#6
  • Sep 10, 2005
  • #6
I've seen them, and they are drop-dead gorgeous. What do you mean cheap plastic? I've never seen the interior, but for a Caddy I would expect more craftsmanship.
 
0

03 SVT VERT

New Member
Jun 7, 2004
154
0
0
Sep 10, 2005
#7
  • Sep 10, 2005
  • #7
They are only slightly faster then an '05 stock to stock. Fastest I have seen is a 13 flat. Think of it as a heavier GTO with a softer suspension.
 

Agent Smith

New Member
Apr 23, 2005
3
0
0
Sep 10, 2005
#8
  • Sep 10, 2005
  • #8
I do like the exhaust sound. And yes, the interior is not exactly what I would expect in a car of that price. But then again, the interior isn't the main selling point either.
 

Jenns01TA

Active Member
Mar 31, 2005
37
0
36
Sep 10, 2005
#9
  • Sep 10, 2005
  • #9
I have been following these on the GT/GTS circuit since the beginning of the season and the "V" series has been able to holds its own to the Porschas and the Vipers. I am not sure how they will do straight track, but the CTS-V is hammering home in SCCA.

Time and time again I am amazed at the agility of that beast for it being "the fat chick at the prom"...she's catching some serious attention.

P.S. EDIT: Don't count it out simply because it says Automatic. The all new Hydra-Matic 6L80 six-speed has DSC capability that allows the driver to shift via clutchless control. In reality, this is the best of both worlds. One day in our lifetime, manuals in high end sports cars may very well be gone.

And this looks alright by my standards..



Jenn
 

jimb05

New Member
Oct 16, 2004
9
1
0
Sep 11, 2005
#10
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #10
The CTS-V is a 6 speed manual. The STS is an auto. The interior you posted is that if an STS.

CTS-V is equipped with the LS6 motor from the Corvette Z06. 0-60 around 4.7 secs and agile as well. Top Gear pitted it against an Audi S4 and it smoked it around the track (the S4 is AWD). It is definitely a nice ride and deserves respect as a performance vehicle. You can get them used for $37k and up.
 

Jenns01TA

Active Member
Mar 31, 2005
37
0
36
Sep 11, 2005
#11
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #11
Eeeee gad. Okay. Off to bed with me. STS-V/CTS-V. It's all a blur. Thanks for the correction, Sir. The interior I viewed of CTS-V is fairly ugly.

Good Night all.

Jenn
 
0

03 SVT VERT

New Member
Jun 7, 2004
154
0
0
Sep 11, 2005
#12
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #12
By the way, they have an LS2 now (6.0L), 2004's had an LS6 (5.7L). The LS6 was actually the better of the two IMHO as it made 5 more hp and had a slightly lower compression ratio. Plus a 350 sounds more traditional then a 364, then again it wasn't really a 350, it was a 346.
 

jimb05

New Member
Oct 16, 2004
9
1
0
Sep 11, 2005
#13
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #13
Jenn, I meant no offense. I simply had info to add to the discussion. Sorry if I came across that way.

03 SVT, yes the 2006 will have the LS2. I would be interested to see exactly what if any improvement it brings to the car.
 
S

SactoStang

New Member
Aug 2, 2005
0
0
0
Sacramento CA
Sep 11, 2005
#14
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #14
Hopefully for those GM/Caddy fans, the improvements would include a more durable rear end. I've lurked a while on the CTSV boards and read a lot of complaints about the glass rear end and bad wheel hop. IMO, nice four door but not as sexy as the '05 Stang.
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Sep 11, 2005
#15
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #15
SpeedyArizona said:
I've seen them, and they are drop-dead gorgeous. What do you mean cheap plastic? I've never seen the interior, but for a Caddy I would expect more craftsmanship.
Click to expand...

I guess it's "beauty is in the eye of the beholder".
IMHO the CTS is ugly as sin. The V series looks a lot better than a regular CTS, but it's still ugly to me. At least the STS has the ugly factor toned down a bit.

I have test drive CTSs and the interior is really cheap ugly hard edged plastic. Even worse than the 05/06 Mustang (I really don't like the dash and door panel plastic on the Mustang too). The bottoms of the windows are really high so I felt like I was sitting in a bath tub when driving the CTS.

The GM auto trannie is excellent. Ford could use an auto trannie that good. In fact the Ford engineers wanted to use the GM auto trannie in the Lincoln LS but were shot down by upper management.

I will hand it to GM, the CTS-V is blindingly fast, Ford really needs something that performs like it. I'd love to have a Lincoln LS (Or even a Mustang)with a LS2 power train.
 

Jenns01TA

Active Member
Mar 31, 2005
37
0
36
Sep 11, 2005
#16
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #16
jimb05 said:
Jenn, I meant no offense. I simply had info to add to the discussion. Sorry if I came across that way.

03 SVT, yes the 2006 will have the LS2. I would be interested to see exactly what if any improvement it brings to the car.
Click to expand...

No offense taken Boss. I was tired and needed to go to bed. As for the CTS, I had considered one before I bought the Stang. It is too angular for me. I like round ample lines and curves.

You fellas behave today. I will be back on this evening. Have a nice day all!

Jenn
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Sep 11, 2005
#17
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #17
SactoStang said:
Hopefully for those GM/Caddy fans, the improvements would include a more durable rear end. I've lurked a while on the CTSV boards and read a lot of complaints about the glass rear end and bad wheel hop. IMO, nice four door but not as sexy as the '05 Stang.
Click to expand...
the wheel hop is from road-ablility, same reason in the GTO IRS and Cobra IRS. If you put stiffer bushings in then every would whine that the ride is too bumpy. You have to remember this is a production car and car mags will cry about how stiff the ride is.
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Sep 11, 2005
#18
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #18
Jenns05Stang said:
I have been following these on the GT/GTS circuit since the beginning of the season and the "V" series has been able to holds its own to the Porschas and the Vipers. I am not sure how they will do straight track, but the CTS-V is hammering home in SCCA.

Time and time again I am amazed at the agility of that beast for it being "the fat chick at the prom"...she's catching some serious attention.

P.S. EDIT: Don't count it out simply because it says Automatic. The all new Hydra-Matic 6L80 six-speed has DSC capability that allows the driver to shift via clutchless control. In reality, this is the best of both worlds. One day in our lifetime, manuals in high end sports cars may very well be gone.

And this looks alright by my standards..

Jenn
Click to expand...
I already have a very similar tranny in my Magnum. It's alright, but not near as fun or responsive as a true manual, this is why I said I would go with the CTS-V, instead of the XLR-V.

I think it'd take more than intake and exhaust to hang with one of these. They run 13.1's all day. Now exhaust, intake, tune, and gears, now you're talking.
 

jimb05

New Member
Oct 16, 2004
9
1
0
Sep 11, 2005
#19
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #19
GM has reportedly fixed (or at least reduced) the wheel hop issue with a TSb for a new set of bushings. Supposedly reduces hop and strain on the rear end making them a bit more durable. There is also something called a KARS cradle which sounds like an advanced concept of what we used to call ladder bars. KARS is an aftermarket thing though. I like the car but dollar for dollar it doesn't get much better than a Mustang GT (once you beat a decent price out of the dealers).
 

Pliskin

New Member
Jul 27, 2004
109
0
0
Sep 11, 2005
#20
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #20
I meant the exterior looks a lot like plastic. Maybe its just those tail lights I dunno. I know they're MADE of plastic but they look so cheap. I'm not really sure but it still is a beautifully made car by GM. Now I have TWO cars I'd buy from GM if I had a chance. A C6 Vette and a CTS-V.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
174
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Saturday at 8:05 PM
AeroCoupe
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
C
Progress Thread 2004 Comp Orange GT
  • ctandc
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
56
Views
5K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
ctandc
C
New to this forum be a veteran on others
  • JmP6889928
  • May 19, 2019
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon May 20, 2019
JmP6889928
M
Progress Thread Monkeybutt2000's 89 vert build thread- 408w build in progress
  • Monkeybutt2000
  • Apr 4, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
437
Views
68K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 20, 2026
2Blue2
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?