I've decided on CompXE256 cam for my car, or something similar. I've been looking at hydrualic, but what about hydrualic roller? or solid? or solid roller?
What should I get, what are the pros/cons of them? Does one or another make more hp or torque.....??????
A hydraulic flat tappet will be the easiest since there is no conversion involved, but a hydraulic roller will have the broadest torque with at least the same power. A solid roller will deliver all the above plus more rev potential.
My recommendations for a street engine in order of preference:
1. Hydro flat
2. Hydro roller
3. Solid roller.
Would it be worth it to change to a roller setup including roller cam and lifter? I mean, its not cheap compared to non-roller parts, but what all would I gain with a roller valvetrain?
A roller conversion is quite expensive. Roller will allow faster opening of the valves, a more aggressive cam while maintaining good idle, less friction, and therefore more power. You will also have to change the distributor gear.
In the range of cam you are looking at IMO there is not alot to gain with anything more than a hyd flat. More rpms, more spring pressure, more lift etc, then there is a bigger difference.
If the springs are fairly fresh you could probably get away with it.I had an unknown cam in my 289 when I bought it, and it had over half an inch of lift. The car still idled smoothly at about 700 rpm with a 600 holley and long tube headers.Higher lift cams also benifit from good rocker arms too.
From what I've read, roller cams open the valves faster,which can give a slightly stronger vacuum signal to carb. This way you can run a bigger cam and still get the car to idle, and have a little more low end torque (as well as minimizing friction with rollers. the more spring tension, the more friction). Also the cam is at or around max lift longer, flowing more air than an identicle lift non-roller cam.If the two cams have the same duration and lift, the roller will still have alot more flow. I think they are worth it.